Regulators concerned about retail investors’ involvement with “complex crypto products”

cryptoslatePublished on 2022-03-30Last updated on 2022-03-30

Abstract

Retail investors’ involvement in crypto and traditional finance within the past few years has grown to new heights, which is now giving regulators a cause for concern.

Retail investors’ involvement in crypto and traditional finance within the past few years has grown to new heights, which is now giving regulators a cause for concern.

FINRA urges members to educate retail investors

According to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the majority of retail investors don’t understand the many complex investment products that are on the market and their associated risks.

This has forced the brokerage firm regulator to issue a notice to all of its members about acting in the best interests of their clients.

The regulator has compelled its members to comply with the Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) act which requires brokers to act in the clients’ best interest.

In essence, brokerage firms might have to start explaining the nature of some of their products to their customers alongside their potential rewards and risks.

Beyond that, the regulator is also considering broader rules for these investment products. It is currently seeking stakeholders’ opinions on whether the current regulatory framework is sufficient to protect investors — a move that many predicts is preceding a new set of rules that would be guiding “complex products.”

Crypto investment products are being targeted

One area that could be affected is crypto with its complex offerings. In the warning note, FINRA describes a complex product as

“A product with features that may make it difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the product and its risks (including the payout structure and how the product may perform in different market and economic conditions).”

This definition covers several investment vehicles, including defined outcome ETFs, volatility-linked ETPs, structured products. In addition, mutual funds and ETFs that offer strategies employing cryptocurrency futures are also on the list. Thus, those offering crypto ETFs may have to operate under stricter rules.

According to FINRA,

“The features of these products are such that they may be difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the products and their risks and, therefore, are complex.”

It added that the risk becomes much higher when a retail investor accesses these products without the assistance of a professional.

Notably, FINRA isn’t the only government agency concerned with the various financial products on the market, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has, at different times, been critical of these products and urging investors to carry out their research before investing.

Related Reads

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

The article compares two major ETH treasury companies, SharpLink and Bitmine, for investors seeking indirect ETH exposure via stocks during a bear market. Both hold significant ETH at similar cost bases (~$3,609 and ~$3,400 respectively) and face comparable percentage losses (>50%). Key differences lie in scale, valuation, and financing. Bitmine holds 5.7M ETH (4.7% of supply) with a ~$76B market cap and trades at only a ~6% discount to its net asset value (NAV). It has superior liquidity, aggressive financing (raising $19.2B in 11 months), and inclusion in the Russell 1000 index. However, its structure includes perpetual preferred stock with dividend costs, and past investors paid significant premiums, adding an extra layer of valuation risk. SharpLink holds ~887k ETH, has a ~$10.2B market cap, and trades at a deeper ~21% discount to NAV. Its financing has been slower, relying on smaller offerings. It promotes an "institutional narrative" with ties to Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin and RWA/tokenization plans, though these remain unimplemented. Its liquidity is lower, but its simpler capital structure means current investors aren't paying for past overvaluation. In summary: For tactical trading in a downturn, Bitmine offers better liquidity and tighter NAV pricing. For potential long-term upside if ETH recovers, SharpLink's deeper discount offers more theoretical repair room, though it faces execution risks. The choice depends on whether one prioritizes trading efficiency and scale (Bitmine) or a potentially larger discount and simpler structure (SharpLink).

链捕手58m ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

链捕手58m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片