'Institutional demand' as large transactions on Cardano up 50X in 2022

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-03-30Last updated on 2022-03-30

Abstract

Crypto intelligence firm IntoTheBlock reports that the number of large transactions on the Cardano blockchain has increased by more than 50X this year. 

Crypto intelligence firm IntoTheBlock reports that the number of large transactions on the Cardano blockchain has increased by more than 50X this year. 
Large Transaction Volume (LTV) refers to aggregated volume from transactions denominated in Cardano’s native ADA token valued at more than $100,000. Since Jan. 1, LTV has increased from 1.35 billion ADA per day to 69 billion ADA (worth $81.4 billion) changing hands on Cardano on Mar. 28.
That’s a 51-fold increase in about three months and marks one of the highest volume levels since mid-2018, according to IntoTheBlock. In a Mar. 29 tweet, the firm said that such high volume indicates “increasing institutional demand.”

While other metrics such as average transaction size and volatility remain relatively stagnant according to the data analytics firm, total addresses have been increasing since the start of 2022. The year began with about 3.4 million addresses, which has now grown to 5 million. While only seven DApps appear on DeFi Llama currently, co-founder Charles Hoskinson said many more are expected following due to a hard fork expected mid year.
Total value locked (TVL) is currently at $303 million according to DeFi app tracker DeFiLlama, just shy of the $326 million all-time high set on Mar. 24.
Hoskinson gave a rousing keynote speech at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai on Monday in which he spoke of the need for decentralization and the difficulties in coordination it entails. He said that “we are entering a new era,” with Web3 but the problem is that “unlike with Web2, there’s no leader” to make decisions for the industry.
“If we’re truly decentralized, we have to somehow come together and figure this out. We have to write some sort of constitution for these things; we have to decide ‘What is the Bill of Rights for the use of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology?’”
“There are two paths before us — one, we keep our integrity and we look to decentralization, find these things, understand these things,” he said. “Or, two, we ignore it. In which case we’ll have custodians, we’ll have escort keys, highly centralized, highly optimized consensus algorithms that can be reset at any time. The few will be in control of the many.
“This is the decision, and I don’t make that decision — all of you do.”

Related Reads

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

The article compares two major ETH treasury companies, SharpLink and Bitmine, for investors seeking indirect ETH exposure via stocks during a bear market. Both hold significant ETH at similar cost bases (~$3,609 and ~$3,400 respectively) and face comparable percentage losses (>50%). Key differences lie in scale, valuation, and financing. Bitmine holds 5.7M ETH (4.7% of supply) with a ~$76B market cap and trades at only a ~6% discount to its net asset value (NAV). It has superior liquidity, aggressive financing (raising $19.2B in 11 months), and inclusion in the Russell 1000 index. However, its structure includes perpetual preferred stock with dividend costs, and past investors paid significant premiums, adding an extra layer of valuation risk. SharpLink holds ~887k ETH, has a ~$10.2B market cap, and trades at a deeper ~21% discount to NAV. Its financing has been slower, relying on smaller offerings. It promotes an "institutional narrative" with ties to Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin and RWA/tokenization plans, though these remain unimplemented. Its liquidity is lower, but its simpler capital structure means current investors aren't paying for past overvaluation. In summary: For tactical trading in a downturn, Bitmine offers better liquidity and tighter NAV pricing. For potential long-term upside if ETH recovers, SharpLink's deeper discount offers more theoretical repair room, though it faces execution risks. The choice depends on whether one prioritizes trading efficiency and scale (Bitmine) or a potentially larger discount and simpler structure (SharpLink).

链捕手1h ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片