Charles Hoskinson Announces Major Cardano Update: '60 Times More...'

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-30Last updated on 2026-07-30

Abstract

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano ($ADA), has announced a major upcoming update called Leios, which he claims will increase the network's performance by approximately 60 times. He emphasized Cardano's decentralized governance, stating the community can collectively decide the network's future, allocate resources, vote, and implement changes without a central authority. Hoskinson acknowledged that while Cardano is technologically stronger now than in 2024, it has lost market position, brand value, and industry respect. He pledged to take immediate steps to restore $ADA to a leading path. He expressed dissatisfaction with the ecosystem's branding, marketing, and adoption efforts but affirmed that Cardano is a resilient "marathon" project that will persist regardless of market conditions.

The founder of Cardano ($ADA) Charles Hoskinson stated that the $ADA ecosystem needs to regain its position, emphasizing the network's decentralized governance structure and the upcoming Leios upgrade.

Hoskinson stated that the Cardano community can determine the network's future without the need for any central authority. He explained that the community can come together to create a roadmap, allocate resources for that plan, vote, and implement the accepted changes, arguing that Cardano is a truly decentralized ecosystem that is constantly evolving on its own.

Hoskinson announced that the next major technical upgrade for Cardano will be Leios, stating that this upgrade will increase the network's performance approximately 60-fold. He noted that the launch of Leios is expected soon and will provide a significant leap in Cardano's technological capabilities.

Hoskinson, calling Cardano one of the 'promising' projects in the cryptocurrency market, stated that the project will continue to exist regardless of market conditions. Hoskinson said: 'No matter what you do, Cardano will always be here and will continue to make its voice heard.'

Hoskinson stated that Cardano is technologically stronger than it was in 2024, but acknowledged that the project has lost market position, brand value, and respect in the industry. He indicated that he will immediately take the necessary steps to put $ADA back on the right track and propel it to leading positions.

Hoskinson also argued that Cardano has earned its success, while expressing dissatisfaction with the weak branding, marketing, and adoption efforts within the ecosystem.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main technological upgrade announced by Charles Hoskinson for Cardano, and what performance improvement does he claim it will bring?

AThe main technological upgrade announced is Leios. Charles Hoskinson claims it will increase the network's performance by approximately 60 times.

QAccording to Hoskinson, how is the future of the Cardano network determined, and what role does the community play?

AAccording to Hoskinson, the Cardano community can determine the network's future without a central authority. The community can unite to create a roadmap, allocate resources for it, vote, and implement the accepted changes.

QWhat does Charles Hoskinson admit Cardano has lost recently, despite its technological strength?

AHe admits that despite being technologically stronger, Cardano has lost market position, brand value, and respect within the industry.

QWhat specific steps does Hoskinson mention he will take regarding Cardano's current situation?

AHe states he will take the necessary steps immediately to get ADA back on the right track and return it to a leading position.

QBesides the technological upgrade Leios, what other area does Charles Hoskinson express dissatisfaction with regarding Cardano's ecosystem?

AHe expresses dissatisfaction with the weak branding, marketing, and adoption efforts within the Cardano ecosystem.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit33m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit33m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit43m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit43m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片