Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-07-20Last updated on 2026-07-20

Abstract

On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launchpad vlad.fun experienced internal sabotage on its launch day. Two external developers secretly hardcoded their own token into the platform's frontend, making it the only token visible to users and hiding all others. The core team detected the anomaly within two hours, fired the developers, and removed the malicious code. The developers claimed the action was for "clicks." They refunded approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token profits, totaling about 7.8 ETH, to the team. An additional 4.16 ETH in protocol fees from the launch is held in a team multisig wallet. Built by a five-person team in 48 hours, vlad.fun's code was provided by the two external developers. Their last commit added the hardcoded line. When confronted, they initially blamed technical issues, but later attempted to delete the evidence before confessing. The platform is currently paused. A community member, Will Mexi, clarified he was not involved and was the one who discovered and reported the issue, having previously enabled branch protection which preserved the evidence. vlad.fun's design allows token deployment and direct listing on Uniswap V3/V4 in one transaction, with liquidity permanently locked to reduce rug pull risks. It features anti-whale measures and flexible fee routing. Despite this incident, the Robinhood Chain launchpad ecosystem remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction.


Author: Nicky, Foresight News


On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launch platform vlad.fun experienced malicious actions by internal developers on its launch day. According to official sources, two external developers involved in building the platform secretly created their own token and hardcoded it into the frontend code, causing only that token to be visible to users upon platform launch, while all other creators' tokens were completely hidden. The team discovered the anomaly within two hours, promptly dismissed the involved developers, and removed the malicious code.


The official statement emphasized that the team never approved issuing a vlad.fun platform token, and the two individuals unilaterally decided to launch one for "page views." After negotiation, the duo returned approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token proceeds. The recovered funds, totaling about 7.8 ETH, have been deposited into the team's secure wallet. Additionally, approximately 4.16 ETH in protocol fees generated from the platform launch are held in the team's multi-signature address.


Public information shows that vlad.fun was rapidly built by a small team of 5 within 48 hours. Currently, two project-affiliated members have issued statements, but the specific identities of the two external developers have not been disclosed as of publishing. According to the incident explanation thread posted by the project's official account on July 18th, the two external developers were responsible for providing the core codebase for the launchpad. In the final code commit before the platform went live, they manually added a line of hardcoded logic to the frontend, forcing their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while other creators' tokens were completely obscured due to loading issues.


After the launch, users quickly noticed the anomaly, with the entire platform displaying only one token. Team members began reviewing the code and found the manually added hardcoded line in the commit history. When questioned by the team, the two developers initially blamed technical issues such as RPC failures, environment variable problems, and caching, but the persistent visibility of the relevant token contradicted such explanations.


According to the official account, one of the developers later requested the disabling of the branch protection feature on the code repository, claiming a need to "rollback some content." Before removing the protection, the team performed a timestamp backup of the entire repository and observed the two deleting the line containing the hardcoded logic. The official statement noted that this attempt to destroy evidence ultimately revealed their intent. Confronted with the evidence, the two developers admitted to their actions.


This incident highlights the trust risks faced by rapidly built crypto projects when involving external developers. The identities of the two involved developers have not been publicly disclosed, with the team stating they have taken advice to withhold their identities for now. vlad.fun stated that in the future, external personnel will no longer be allowed access to sensitive systems, and the team prefers developing based on open-source contracts.


The official website shows that vlad.fun is currently in a suspended operational state. The team stated they will prioritize handling matters for affected users.


Community member Will Mexi publicly clarified his role after the incident. He stated he was responsible for project application listings, frontend optimization, design, branding, and animations, and was not one of the two developers involved, nor did he participate in planning or executing the operation. According to his account, he tested a normal version of the website about 20 minutes before launch, so he did not notice the anomaly.


Will Mexi said that after the platform officially launched, he saw the token appearing illogically, immediately read the newly committed code, discovered the hardcoded line, and promptly reported it to the core team. He also mentioned that enabling branch protection earlier was due to caution regarding external code, and this setting ultimately preserved the complete commit history and evidence of intent. He simultaneously denied purchasing any platform tokens and claimed to have incurred losses due to expensive RPC, API, and server deployment costs.


Core team member @SOLsesame also expressed support in the incident thread. He belongs to the core small team that has collaborated with Will Mexi and others for over a year and is not one of the involved external developers. His background shows he is an active builder in the Solana ecosystem, having been deeply involved in the ai16z ecosystem and its PartnersNFT and PartnersDAO projects. Recently, he collaborated with Will Mexi to build and launch the Black Bull NFT series from scratch for the ANSEM community within 24 hours.


As a token launchpad on Robinhood Chain, vlad.fun differs from traditional bonding curve launchpads. Its design goal is to complete token deployment and direct launch to Uniswap V3 or V4 in a single transaction, making tokens instantly tradable on decentralized exchanges without going through a "graduation" migration step. Liquidity pool positions are permanently locked via a locker contract and cannot be withdrawn by the team, reducing the risk of rug pulls at the mechanism level.


In terms of fairness design, the platform employs mechanisms such as a fixed supply, no presale, and no large team allocations. It also offers an optional developer priority buy feature, allowing developers to buy at launch with zero transaction fees. An anti-whale mechanism limits single wallet holdings to 2%, preventing concentrated holdings by a single address. For fee routing, the platform supports setting a 1% to 5% transaction fee, which can be instantly directed to specified recipients, including wallet addresses, social accounts, or buyback/burn proxies. Fees are locked at launch and cannot be changed. Additionally, the platform plans optional models such as staking for rewards.


Despite vlad.fun hitting pause due to the internal incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain has not cooled down. According to DefiLlama data, the chain's current TVL is approximately $258 million, with 24-hour fees around $118,000 and revenue about $106,000. Uniswap's 24-hour fee expenditure on the chain reached $1.95 million. The ecosystem has already gathered multiple launchpads, each forming a differentiated competitive landscape: the latecomer PONS holds the leading launchpad position with intensive development and continuous updates. Its platform token has a market cap of about $12 million, with a gain of over 4200% in the past 7 days. Furthermore, the Butterfly platform focuses on stock-like meme tokens but has yet to produce a hit. Native Uniswap innovative mechanism tokens, such as RWA dividend-sharing tokens like index, which received official attention, once surged to a market cap of $30 million on July 17th.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the primary technical action taken by the two external developers that led to the incident on vlad.fun?

AThey secretly added a line of hardcoded script to the platform's front-end code, which forced only their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while hiding all other creators' tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the main reason given by the developers for their actions, and what key evidence contradicted this reason?

AThey claimed it was for 'page views.' However, the key contradictory evidence was that when questioned, they initially tried to blame technical issues like RPC failures or cache problems, but the fact that their token remained consistently visible made these excuses implausible.

QHow did the core team discover and prove the malicious intent of the external developers?

AAfter users reported seeing only one token, the team reviewed the code commit history and found the manually added hardcoded line. The developers then tried to delete this code and asked to disable branch protection on the repository, which the team had already backed up. Their attempt to destroy evidence confirmed their malicious intent.

QWhat are two key design features of the vlad.fun platform aimed at reducing scam risks compared to traditional launchpads?

A1. Tokens are launched directly to Uniswap V3/V4 in a single transaction, making them instantly tradable without a migration step. 2. The liquidity pool is permanently locked via a locker contract, preventing the team from withdrawing it and reducing 'rug pull' risks.

QWhat is the current status of the vlad.fun platform following the incident, and what does the article suggest about the broader launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain?

AThe vlad.fun platform is currently paused. The article suggests that despite this incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction and others exploring different niches.

Related Reads

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit17m ago

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit17m ago

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit21m ago

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit21m ago

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit21m ago

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy PEOPLE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)After purchasing your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Easily trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.8k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy PEOPLE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PEOPLE (PEOPLE) are presented below.

活动图片