# Prevention Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Prevention", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Ethereum Address Poisoning Attack Escalates: After One Transfer, He Received 89 Alert Emails

Ethereum address poisoning attacks have evolved into a highly automated and industrialized threat, as highlighted by a user who received 89 alert emails after just two legitimate stablecoin transfers. Attackers monitor blockchain activity to identify targets, then generate and send fake addresses with similar starting and ending characters to the victim’s transaction history, aiming to trick users into copying the wrong address in future transactions. A 2025 study revealed that between July 2022 and June 2024, Ethereum saw 17 million poisoning attempts affecting 1.3 million users, causing at least $79.3 million in losses. The problem has intensified since the Fusaka upgrade in December 2025, which reduced transaction fees and enabled attackers to scale poisoning efforts—evidenced by a massive increase in dust transactions (e.g., USDT dust transfers surged 612%). The core defense remains vigilance: always verify addresses before sending funds. Use tools like Etherscan’s address labels, ENS domains, and address highlighting to distinguish legitimate addresses. Enable wallet whitelisting and heed warnings when copying suspicious addresses. As transactions become cheaper and attacks more frequent, user awareness and improved interface designs are critical to mitigating risks.

marsbit03/13 12:06

Ethereum Address Poisoning Attack Escalates: After One Transfer, He Received 89 Alert Emails

marsbit03/13 12:06

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

Blockchain transactions require gas fee as fuel, but malicious actors exploit this mechanism to drain assets through deceptive practices. Common traps include: 1) Unlimited token approvals, where users grant open-ended access to smart contracts, enabling unauthorized transfers; 2) Gas fee hijacking, where attackers manipulate transaction parameters or embed infinite loops to force excessive gas payments; 3) Fake approvals/transactions via phishing sites that mimic legitimate dApps to steal assets. Key preventive measures: - Apply minimal approval principles, authorizing only necessary token amounts and revoking unused permissions. - Manually set gas limits and prices using wallet advanced settings, avoiding defaults during high network congestion. - Verify contract addresses, transaction details, and DApp authenticity before confirming any transaction. - Use separate wallets for daily interactions and large holdings to isolate risks. If compromised: - Immediately freeze the wallet and revoke all suspicious approvals. - Preserve evidence (TxID, contract addresses) and report to platforms. - Seek professional assistance for large losses—avoid paying "recovery fees" (common secondary scams). Recommended tools: Approval checkers (e.g., Revoke.cash), block explorers (Etherscan), and real-time alert systems. Stay vigilant by scrutinizing every transaction and rejecting unsolicited links.

marsbit02/28 14:34

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

marsbit02/28 14:34

活动图片

Market Analysis

Project Updates