Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-05-19Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-05-19

Abstrak

The rapid growth of the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) market, now nearing $30 billion on-chain, has largely bypassed the DeFi ecosystem. Only about $2.47 billion is actively locked in DeFi protocols, indicating a penetration rate of just 9%. A major barrier is the "permissioned" architecture of most RWA products, like BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which are designed for institutional compliance. They require whitelisting, off-chain settlement, and strict investor accreditation, making them incompatible with open, permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap. This is evident in categories like bonds/money market funds ($16.6B on-chain, $920M in DeFi) and tokenized equities ($2.7B on-chain, $78M in DeFi). Notable exceptions are private credit protocols (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge) and assets like Ondo's USDY, which were designed from inception for DeFi composability, allowing them to be used freely as collateral. Morpho and Aave Horizon also demonstrate successful RWA lending integrations. However, industry reports (IOSCO, ECB) warn that growth may remain confined within traditional financial systems due to fragmented regulations, lack of unified standards, and inherent conflicts between DeFi's open logic and compliance requirements like minimum investments and fixed redemption windows. The RWA sector is effectively split into two markets: a compliant, permissioned on-chain finance market and a smaller DeFi-native market focused on composability. For DeFi penetr...

Author: Gino Matos

Compiler: Chopper, Foresight News

Data from DeFiLlama shows that the on-chain tokenized real-world asset (RWA) scale has approached $30 billion. However, only $2.47 billion is shown as the active DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL), which is the actual amount of funds deposited into third-party DeFi platform liquidity pools and participating in the ecosystem's operation.

The vast majority of other RWA assets remain outside of scenarios such as lending markets and collateral vaults, which enable free combination and interaction of crypto assets. Bonds and money market funds are the largest RWA category by scale, with an on-chain total exceeding $16.6 billion. Yet, the effective TVL flowing into the DeFi ecosystem is only $920 million. The on-chain scale of gold and commodity assets is $5.7 billion, with only $183.6 million effectively circulating in DeFi. Equity assets have an on-chain scale of $2.7 billion, but the funds that have entered the DeFi market are a mere $78.27 million.

Only the private credit sector stands out: its on-chain scale is $3.226 billion, with a DeFi effective TVL of $1.257 billion, achieving an ecosystem penetration rate of 39%. The reason behind this is that projects like Maple Finance and Centrifuge were designed from the outset as lending financial instruments, making them naturally suited for DeFi application scenarios.

In contrast, tokenized products like US Treasury bond funds, gold assets, and stock assets are designed by their issuers to cater more to institutional custody needs, with their overall architecture aligning with the operational models of traditional compliant funds.

Distribution of On-Chain Market Value and DeFi Active TVL Across Four RWA Categories

Permissioned Architecture Becomes the Biggest Barrier to DeFi Composability

DeFiLlama categorizes the money market fund product BUIDL by BlackRock as a permissioned fund. Its effective TVL within the DeFi ecosystem is only $18.9 million.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) pointed out in its final report on financial asset tokenization released in November 2025 that BUIDL created a permissioned system on a public blockchain for issuance, custody, secondary trading among qualified investors, dividend distribution, and redemption.

Potential investors must pass the whitelist review on the Securitize platform. Furthermore, on-chain asset transfer actions only attain full legal validity after information verification and confirmation by an offline transfer agent.

This means that BUIDL is essentially a compliant custody infrastructure built atop blockchain channels, primarily serving institutional asset custody and offline account reconciliation needs. Its smart contracts only support interactions from whitelisted addresses. Without using a compliant wrapping layer as an intermediary, they cannot be directly deposited into permissionless, open DeFi protocols like Aave or Uniswap.

In February 2026, BlackRock completed the integration of BUIDL with Uniswap, enabling partial assets to enter trading pools. However, asset access permissions are still controlled by Securitize, limited to qualified investment institutions with a net asset value of no less than $5 million; ordinary market participants still cannot participate.

IOSCO found that the vast majority of tokenized money market funds on the market currently adopt similar operational models. These assets have so far failed to deliver the high secondary market liquidity value previously anticipated by the industry.

RedStone stated bluntly in its tokenization industry report released in March 2026 that the most challenging part of asset tokenization implementation is coordinating a series of complex rules across different jurisdictions and public chain ecosystems, including compliance review, identity verification, trading permission restrictions, risk control sanctions screening, and corporate rights distribution. Looking at the current market, Morpho and Aave Horizon are among the few genuine case studies successfully implementing RWA assets in DeFi applications.

In short, each compliance and access restriction set by project parties further raises the barrier for assets to enter the DeFi ecosystem. Products like US Treasury token bonds and money market funds are themselves designed to meet the regulatory requirements of licensed institutional investors, actively incorporating various permission constraints.

Gold and commodity assets face another practical issue. CoinGecko data shows that in Q1 2026, spot trading volume for tokenized gold reached $90.7 billion, surpassing the total for the entire year of 2025. However, the vast majority of this trading occurs on centralized exchanges. The aforementioned DeFi effective TVL of $183.6 million only represents a tiny fraction circulating within the ecosystem. The enormous trading volume in centralized markets is completely outside the scope of DeFiLlama's data statistics.

Positive Outlook: Highly Compatible Products Have Set Examples

In early 2026, the TVL of Ondo's USDY exceeded $1 billion and has now achieved full coverage across nine public chain ecosystems. The Ondo Global Markets segment, launched in September 2025, focuses on tokenized US stocks and ETF assets for overseas investors. It was designed from the start to support free asset transfer and direct use as DeFi collateral. Currently, the TVL for corresponding assets is $650 million, with cumulative trading volume exceeding $12 billion.

According to RedStone statistics, the RWA deposit scale on the Morpho platform exceeds $620 million, and the total RWA-related asset scale on Aave Horizon is $423.5 million. Both lending protocols have successfully implemented mature RWA collateralized lending models.

These implementation cases fully prove that as long as the design philosophy of permissionless free circulation is upheld from the asset issuance stage, RWA assets can fully achieve composability within the DeFi ecosystem.

During an industry roundtable hosted by DWF Labs in April 2026, projects including Centrifuge, Falcon Finance, and xStocks jointly proposed the view that the RWA sector has now diverged into two major development tracks. The first prioritizes compliance with asset ownership regulations, adhering to a strictly permissioned and controlled path. The second balances compliant issuance standards while enabling secondary market circulation properties, with ecosystem composability as the core design orientation.

Graham Nelson, the person in charge of the Centrifuge project, stated that stringent whitelist access mechanisms mean each participant in a liquidity pool needs to undergo separate qualification reviews, directly blocking the path for assets to enter open DeFi.

The DeRWA solution launched by Centrifuge bypasses this barrier by wrapping the underlying primary issuance assets in a compliant manner while relaxing restrictions on secondary market asset circulation. Artem Tolkachev from Falcon Finance also mentioned that ecosystem composability and flexible exit mechanisms are the key bridges connecting real-world assets with crypto market liquidity.

The industry is optimistic that as the overall on-chain RWA asset scale approaches $50 billion, if most projects within the sector shift towards designs compatible with DeFi, the penetration rate of RWA assets in the DeFi ecosystem is expected to break through the current low level of 9%.

Negative Reality: Industry Growth May Be Confined to the Traditional Financial System

Standard Chartered Bank predicts that the global tokenized asset scale will reach $2 trillion by 2028, but it simultaneously warns that this industry boom is likely to be confined within the traditional banking and financial system, with limited growth benefits for the open crypto market.

IOSCO's research in November 2025 also corroborates this point. Constrained by the inherent access barriers and liquidity shortcomings of distributed ledger technology, the current distribution, circulation, and secondary market trading of tokenized assets still heavily rely on traditional financial infrastructure.

The European Central Bank further pointed out in its tokenization industry research report released in April 2026 that the absence of unified global standards for asset tokenization is highly prone to creating isolated asset silos. Different asset systems have their own compliance rules, settlement layers, and access mechanisms, ultimately leading to high concentration of liquidity within closed circles, making interconnection and circulation difficult.

The DeFi penetration rates of 5.5% for bonds and money funds, 3.2% for gold and commodities, and 2.9% for equities directly reflect this fragmented ecosystem pattern.

Most US Treasury tokens and money fund products on the market commonly set minimum investment thresholds, mandatory identity verification, offline asset reconciliation cycles, and fixed redemption windows tied to net asset value. These underlying rules inherently conflict with the operational logic of decentralized exchanges' real-time pricing and permissionless collateral vaults. These constraints are mandatory requirements from the regulatory level and an inevitable choice for asset issuers to adapt to the compliant environment.

Two Markets, One Industry Label

The total on-chain RWA scale of $30 billion and the effective DeFi circulation scale of $2.47 billion, while seemingly belonging to the same RWA sector, actually correspond to two completely separate markets:

  • Compliant On-Chain Financial Market: Primarily consisting of money market funds, US Treasury funds, and institutionally custodied assets. Asset transfer relies on offline transfer agent reconciliation and confirmation, following traditional financial regulations throughout.
  • DeFi Composability Ecosystem Market: Assets can be freely deposited into lending protocols, used as permissionless collateral, and integrated into various automated yield strategies for free circulation.

The chart above predicts the implied DeFi Active TVL under four scenarios in a $50 billion RWA market, ranging from 5% to 25%

The achievement of over $620 million in RWA deposits on Morpho and the circulation of USDY across 9 blockchains is sufficient proof that the second type of market possesses genuine development potential.

To drive the DeFi penetration rate of RWA assets beyond 9%, asset issuers must abandon the 'compliance-system-first' design approach exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL. Instead, they should adopt underlying architectures that natively support permissionless free circulation.

Currently, $28.56 billion of on-chain RWA assets belong to the permissioned control track. This also means that most current tokenized real-world assets are, in essence, more akin to compliant on-chain traditional financial products, rather than general-purpose collateral assets suitable for open DeFi ecosystems.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason why most tokenized real-world assets (RWA) have not been successfully integrated into DeFi ecosystems?

AThe main reason is that the majority of RWA products, such as bond and money market funds, are designed with a permissioned architecture from the outset to comply with institutional custody and traditional regulatory requirements. This includes whitelisting, mandatory identity verification, and reliance on offline settlement processes, which creates significant barriers for these assets to be used in permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap.

QWhich RWA sector, according to the article, has shown a high degree of integration with DeFi, and what is the key factor for its success?

AThe private credit sector has shown high integration, with a 39% penetration rate into DeFi. The key factor for its success is that projects like Maple Finance and Centrifuge were designed from the beginning as lending financial tools, making them inherently compatible with DeFi application scenarios.

QWhat is the fundamental difference between the two distinct markets identified in the article under the common label of "RWA"?

AThe two distinct markets are: 1) A compliant on-chain financial market, consisting of assets like money market funds and treasuries. These assets rely on offline registrars for transfer validation and follow traditional financial regulations. 2) A DeFi-composable ecosystem market, where assets can be freely deposited into lending protocols, used as collateral, and integrated into various automated yield strategies for permissionless circulation.

QWhat solution is mentioned in the article for bridging the gap between compliant primary issuance of RWAs and their potential for secondary market circulation in DeFi?

AThe article mentions Centrifuge's "DeRWA" solution as an example. It involves creating a compliant wrapper for the underlying primary issuance asset while relaxing restrictions on the secondary market circulation of that wrapped asset, thereby enabling it to be used in open DeFi protocols.

QBased on the article's analysis, what must RWA issuers do to significantly increase the current low DeFi penetration rate of their assets?

ATo significantly increase DeFi penetration beyond the current ~9%, RWA issuers must move away from design philosophies centered on a closed, permissioned compliance system (like BlackRock's BUIDL). Instead, they need to adopt a native, permissionless architecture from the ground up that supports free and unrestricted circulation of assets within DeFi ecosystems.

Bacaan Terkait

Repurchase and Burn Hanya Janji Kosong? Jurang Hak yang Sulit Dijembatani antara Token dan Ekuitas

**Ringkasan:** Artikel ini membahas perbedaan mendasar antara hak pemegang saham perusahaan tradisional dan pemegang token proyek crypto. Pemegang saham memiliki klaim residual yang dapat dipaksakan secara hukum atas aset dan keuntungan perusahaan, hak suara, dan hak atas dividen. Sebaliknya, pemegang token crypto seringkali hanya diberikan janji-janji, seperti program pembelian kembali dan pembakaran token, yang tidak memiliki dasar hukum yang mengikat. Proyek dapat mengubah atau menghentikan kebijakan tersebut kapan saja. Kesenjangan hak ini menjadi semakin jelas dengan munculnya proyek crypto seperti Venice AI yang menerbitkan ekuitas (saham) kepada investor tradisional selain token. Investor ekuitas memiliki hak hukum yang jelas, sedangkat pemegang token hanya mengandalkan kebijakan sukarela proyek. Artikel ini juga menyoroti RUU **CLARITY Act** yang sedang dibahas, yang akan mengkategorikan token crypto sebagai **"komoditas digital"** atau **"aset kontrak investasi (sekuritas)"**. Token yang dikategorikan sebagai komoditas digital dilarang memberikan klaim hukum atas pendapatan atau aset perusahaan penerbit kepada pemegangnya. Ini menempatkan program pembelian kembali token di area abu-abu regulasi. Kasus akuisisi Houdini Swap, di mana pemegang token LOCK tidak mendapat kompensasi, ditunjukkan sebagai contoh nyata risiko yang dihadapi pemegang token. Beberapa proyek seperti Aave mencoba membuat mekanisme pembelian kembali yang terotomatisasi dan tidak dapat diubah, tetapi tetap saja dapat diubah melalui suara governance. Kesimpulannya, proyek crypto harus memilih: mengakui token sebagai komoditas digital dan berhenti menjanjikan bagian dari keuntungan perusahaan, atau mendaftarkannya sebagai sekuritas dan memikul biaya kepatuhan hukum. Narasi "token sebagai kepemilikan" selama ini bertahan karena tidak diuji, tetapi masuknya investor ekuitas tradisional dapat mengungkap kerapuhan dasar hukum klaim ekonomi pemegang token.

Foresight News39m yang lalu

Repurchase and Burn Hanya Janji Kosong? Jurang Hak yang Sulit Dijembatani antara Token dan Ekuitas

Foresight News39m yang lalu

Gubernur New Hampshire Kelly Ayotte Menandatangani 'Undang-Undang Dasar Blockchain' – Apa Isi dari HB 639?

Undang-undang baru New Hampshire, HB 639 atau "Hukum Dasar Blockchain," telah ditandatangani oleh Gubernur Kelly Ayotte. Hukum ini menjamin hak warga untuk menyimpan aset digital mereka sendiri (self-custody) di dompet pribadi, tanpa harus bergantung pada bank atau bursa. Selain itu, undang-undang ini melindungi kebebasan menggunakan cryptocurrency untuk pembayaran barang dan jasa yang sah, dan melindungi pihak yang menjalankan infrastruktur blockchain (seperti operator node, penambang, atau validator) dari peraturan yang tidak sesuai, seperti aturan transaksi uang atau sekuritas. HB 639 juga membentuk "Doket Sengketa Blockchain," yaitu jalur pengadilan khusus dengan hakim yang berpengalaman di bidang blockchain untuk menangani kasus terkait dengan lebih cepat dan terprediksi. Langkah ini memperkuat posisi New Hampshire sebagai pemimpin inovasi blockchain, melanjutkan kebijakan sebelumnya yang memperbolehkan investasi dana publik dalam Bitcoin. Bersama-sama, undang-undang ini bertujuan menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang aman bagi individu dan perusahaan di ekosistem aset digital.

ambcrypto42m yang lalu

Gubernur New Hampshire Kelly Ayotte Menandatangani 'Undang-Undang Dasar Blockchain' – Apa Isi dari HB 639?

ambcrypto42m yang lalu

Menjelajahi Dunia Perdagangan Peristiwa: 5 Pasar Prediksi Teratas untuk Setiap Jenis Pengguna

Pasar prediksi telah berkembang dari hobi menjadi industri bernilai miliaran dolar, dengan volume perdagangan bulanan melampaui $20 miliar pada pertengahan 2026. Profitabilitas kini sangat bergantung pada logistik infrastruktur: likuiditas, kecepatan eksekusi, struktur biaya, dan alat manajemen risiko. Artikel ini membahas lima platform utama untuk membantu trader memilih berdasarkan kebutuhan: 1. **Polymarket:** Platform terdesentralisasi global dengan likuiditas tinggi dan beragam kontrak acara, cocok untuk pengguna kripto. Namun, kurang alat mitigasi risiko bawaan. 2. **Kalshi:** Bursa teregulasi CFTC di AS, fokus pada kontrak ekonomi dan olahraga. Pilihan utama untuk institusi, tetapi daftar kontraknya terbatas dan diawasi ketat. 3. **Outpoll:** Berfokus pada trader profesional dan algoritmik. Menawarkan arsitektur CeDeFi, alat risiko bawaan seperti Take-Profit/Stop-Loss, biaya rendah (~0.1%), dan dukungan API lengkap. 4. **OG Predictive:** Platform olahraga teregulasi CFTC dengan fokus pada taruhan prop dan margin trading. Menawarkan biaya per kontrak flat dan integrasi komunitas. 5. **Manifold Markets:** Ekosistem uang virtual (play-money) untuk peramalan santai dan pengujian strategi. Memungkinkan pembuatan pasar bebas tanpa KYC dan biaya, cocok untuk pengembang dan penghobi. Kesimpulannya, kesuksesan dalam perdagangan acara tidak hanya bergantung pada prediksi, tetapi juga pada pemilihan platform yang tepat berdasarkan likuiditas, fitur eksekusi, alat manajemen risiko, dan model kepatuhan regulasi.

TheNewsCrypto1j yang lalu

Menjelajahi Dunia Perdagangan Peristiwa: 5 Pasar Prediksi Teratas untuk Setiap Jenis Pengguna

TheNewsCrypto1j yang lalu

Mengapa Konferensi Besar Kripto Tidak Lagi Populer?

Semakin banyak orang kehilangan minat pada konferensi besar industri kripto offline. Banyak yang mengeluhkan penurunan nilai partisipasi dan minimnya informasi baru, tetapi akar masalahnya lebih dalam. Dulu, konferensi besar sangat penting karena industri kripto bersifat global sejak awal dan tidak memiliki kota pusat tetap. Mereka menjadi titik temu yang mempertemukan pelaku industri dari seluruh dunia. Namun, nilai konferensi utama kini terpecah. Orang-orang berkualitas tinggi—pengembang dan investor—banyak yang beralih ke acara kecil dan privat di sekitarnya, seperti pertemuan eksklusif atau makan malam terpilih. Sementara itu, konten di panggung utama seringkali sudah tidak baru lagi. Pola ini mengurangi peluang untuk 'pertemuan tak terduga' dengan orang baru di luar lingkaran sendiri. Bentuk lain yang muncul adalah konferensi elit hanya dengan undangan, yang menjaga kualitas tetapi menciptakan hambatan bagi pendatang baru. Dampak gabungan dari aktivitas privat dan acara tertutup elit ini mengurangi daya tarik konferensi besar tradisional. Dari sudut pandang optimis, penurunan konferensi kripto khusus ini bisa menandai pergeseran industri ke arah ekspansi eksternal. Banyak pelaku industri kini lebih fokus menjangkau klien tradisional dan mengintegrasikan kripto ke dalam bisnis arus utama, seperti keuangan tradisional. Forum kripto kini muncul di berbagai konferensi industri lain. Ke depannya, jumlah konferensi kripto besar papan atas kemungkinan akan berkurang secara signifikan. Industri telah melampaui fase perluasan internal dan tidak memerlukan pertemuan besar setiap dua bulan. Pergeseran ini, di mana percakapan berkualitas berpindah ke lingkaran yang lebih kecil sementara teknologi kripto mengintegrasi ke dunia luas, adalah tanda kematangan industri.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Mengapa Konferensi Besar Kripto Tidak Lagi Populer?

marsbit1j yang lalu

Indikator Arah Pasar Kripto-Saham | Perusahaan Publik Global Jual Bersih BTC Senilai $85,45 Juta Pekan Lalu, Cadangan Dolar Strategy Tembus $3 Miliar (14 Juli)

**Ikhtisar Pasar Kripto & Saham: Perusahaan Global Jual Bersih BTC Rp140 Triliun, Cadangan USD Strategy Capai Rp490 Triliun (14 Juli)** Pasar saham global mengalami tekanan pekan lalu. Korsel menghadapi arus keluar modal asing yang besar, sementara pasar AS tertekan oleh komentar Trump dan ketegangan dengan Iran. Saham terkait kripto umumnya melemah. Analisis pasar AS menunjukkan sinyal beragam. Survei Bank of America memperingatkan investor untuk mengurangi eksposur saham karena sentimen terlalu bullish. Sebaliknya, Morgan Stanley memperkirakan kenaikan pasar akan meluas didorong oleh kinerja perusahaan di luar raksasa teknologi. Pada aset kripto, perusahaan publik global melakukan **penjualan bersih BTC senilai US$85,45 juta (sekitar Rp140 triliun)** pekan lalu. Strategy (mantan MicroStrategy) dan Metaplanet tidak melakukan pembelian. Namun, dua perusahaan lain, OrangeBTC dan Strive, menambah kepemilikan BTC. **Strategy mengumumkan cadangan USD-nya telah bertambah US$4,5 miliar, menjadi total US$30 miliar (sekitar Rp490 triliun)**, dengan kepemilikan BTC tetap 843.775 koin. Perusahaan lain seperti Hyperscale Data dan Cleanspark juga menambah cadangan BTC mereka. Di sisi lain, beberapa perusahaan seperti BitFuFu, Bitdeer, dan Empery Digital menjual sebagian atau seluruh hasil penambangan BTC mereka untuk pendanaan proyek atau pelunasan utang. Secara keseluruhan, perusahaan publik (non-penambang) memegang **1.139.635 BTC**, setara dengan 5,7% dari kapitalisasi pasar beredar BTC. Laporan menunjukkan perusahaan membeli **110.000 BTC pada Q2 2026**, meningkat 1,8x dari dua kuartal sebelumnya. Untuk aset kripto lain, Bitmine menambah kepemilikan ETH, sementara DFDV menyerahkan pengelolaan operasional meme coin DONT. BNB Plus terkena delisting dari Nasdaq karena harga sahamnya di bawah US$1 dan pindah ke pasar OTC.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Indikator Arah Pasar Kripto-Saham | Perusahaan Publik Global Jual Bersih BTC Senilai $85,45 Juta Pekan Lalu, Cadangan Dolar Strategy Tembus $3 Miliar (14 Juli)

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Kategori Populerright-arrow

Tag Populerright-arrow