Stable TGE Tonight, Will the Market Still Buy into the Stablecoin Public Chain Narrative?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-12-08Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-12-08

Abstrak

Stable, a Layer 1 blockchain supported by Bitfinex and Tether, is set for its mainnet launch on December 8th. It is designed with a focus on stablecoin infrastructure, using USDT as the native gas token to enable sub-second settlements and feeless peer-to-peer transfers. The native token, STABLE, has a fixed supply of 100 billion and is not used for gas fees but for governance, staking, and ecosystem incentives. Token allocation includes 10% for Genesis Distribution (fully unlocked at launch), 40% for ecosystem and community growth, and 25% each for the team and investors (with a 1-year cliff and linear release). The network uses a DPoS consensus model where users stake STABLE to participate in validation and governance. Prior to launch, Stable conducted two pre-deposit phases, which saw massive demand and technical issues, raising concerns over fairness and KYC delays. The project raised $28 million in seed funding at a $300 million valuation. Market expectations are mixed. Pre-launch perpetual trading suggests an FDV around $3 billion, while prediction markets indicate an 85% probability of FDV exceeding $2 billion post-launch. Pre-depositors may see returns between 7% to 16.9% based on current estimates. Exchanges like Bitget and Bybit have announced support, but major platforms like Binance and Coinbase have not.

At 21:00 Beijing time on December 8, the Stable mainnet will officially launch. Stable, a Layer 1 blockchain supported by Bitfinex and Tether, focuses on stablecoin infrastructure. Its core design involves using USDT as the native gas fee, achieving sub-second settlement and gas-free peer-to-peer transfers. As of the time of writing, including Bitget, Backpack, and Bybit have announced they will list STABLE spot trading. Additionally, Binance, Coinbase, and Korean exchanges have not yet announced listings for STABLE spot trading.

Total Supply of 100 Billion, Token Not Used for Gas Fees

The project team has released the whitepaper and tokenomics details before the mainnet launch. Its native token, STABLE, has a total fixed supply of 100 billion tokens. Transfers, payments, and transactions on the Stable network are settled in USDT. STABLE is not used for gas fees but is instead used to coordinate incentive mechanisms between developers and ecosystem participants. The STABLE token allocation is as follows: Genesis Distribution accounts for 10% of the total supply, supporting initial liquidity, community activation, ecosystem activities, and strategic distribution efforts at launch. The genesis distribution portion will be fully unlocked at the mainnet launch.

The Ecosystem & Community fund accounts for 40% of the total supply, allocated to developer grants, liquidity programs, partnerships, community initiatives, and ecosystem growth; the Team allocation accounts for 25% of the total supply, allocated to the founding team, engineers, researchers, and contributors; Investors & Advisors account for 25% of the total supply, allocated to strategic investors and advisors supporting network development, infrastructure construction, and promotion.

Team and investor allocations are subject to a one-year cliff, meaning zero unlocking for the first 12 months, followed by linear vesting. The Ecosystem & Community fund allocation is 8% unlocked at launch, with the remaining portion vested linearly to incentivize developers, partners, and user growth.

Stable utilizes a DPoS (Delegated Proof-of-Stake) model through its StableBFT consensus protocol. This design supports high-throughput settlement while maintaining the economic security required for a global payment network. Staking STABLE tokens is the mechanism for validators and delegators to participate in consensus and earn rewards. The primary roles of the STABLE token are governance and staking: holders can stake tokens to become validators, participate in network security maintenance, and vote in DAO governance to influence protocol upgrades, such as adjusting fee rates or introducing new stablecoin support.

Additionally, STABLE can be used for ecosystem incentives, such as liquidity mining or cross-chain bridging rewards. The project claims that this separated design can attract institutional capital because USDT's stability is much higher than that of volatile governance tokens.

Pre-deposit Controversy: Front-running, KYC Delays

Like Plasma, Stable also opened two deposit periods before the mainnet launch. The first phase of pre-deposits started in late October with an upper limit of $825 million, which was filled within minutes of the announcement. The community questioned potential front-running by some players. The top-ranked wallet deposited hundreds of millions of USDT 23 minutes before the deposit window opened.

The project team did not directly respond and opened a second pre-deposit event on November 6 with an upper limit of $500 million.

However, Stable underestimated the market's enthusiasm for deposits. The moment the second phase opened, massive traffic surge caused its website to slow down and become unresponsive. Consequently, Stable updated the rules, allowing users to deposit via the Hourglass frontend or directly on-chain; the deposit function was reopened for 24 hours, with a maximum of $1 million per wallet and a minimum deposit amount still set at $1,000.

Ultimately, the total deposits in the second phase reached approximately $1.8 billion, with about 26,000 wallets participating.

The review time ranged from a few days to a week, with some users in the community complaining about system lag or repeated requests for additional materials.

Over 85% Probability of $2 Billion FDV

In late July this year, Stable announced the completion of a $28 million seed round led by Bitfinex and Hack VC, bringing its market valuation to around $300 million.

For comparison, Plasma's current market cap is $330 million, with an FDV of $1.675 billion.

Some optimists believe that the stablecoin narrative, Bitfinex's backing, and Plasma's initial price surge followed by a drop might indicate there is still some hype and potential for price appreciation in the near term. However, pessimistic voices are stronger: since gas is not paid in STABLE, its utility is limited, especially as the market has entered a bear cycle and liquidity has become tight, its token value may decline rapidly.

Current Polymarket data shows that the market is betting with an 85% probability that its FDV will exceed $2 billion the day after launch. Calculating conservatively at $2 billion, the STABLE token price would correspond to $0.02.

In the perpetual futures market, according to Bitget行情 data, STABLE/USDT is currently quoted at $0.032, implying an anticipated FDV rising to around $3 billion.

Stable's first pre-deposit phase reached $825 million, and the second phase actually contributed over $1.1 billion, but after proportional allocation, only $500 million was actually pooled. The total pre-deposit size is $1.325 billion. The tokenomics disclose an initial allocation of 10% (for pre-deposit incentive rewards, exchange campaigns, initial on-chain liquidity, etc.). Assuming Stable ultimately airdrops 3%-7% of the supply to pre-depositors, and based on the pre-listing price of $0.032, the corresponding returns would be approximately 7% to 16.9%, meaning every $10,000 deposit corresponds to $700 to $1,690.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat is the core design feature of the Stable Layer 1 blockchain regarding transaction fees?

AThe core design feature is that it uses USDT as the native gas fee, enabling sub-second settlements and gas-free peer-to-peer transfers.

QWhat is the total supply of the STABLE token and what is its primary use, since it is not used for gas?

AThe total supply of the STABLE token is 100 billion. Its primary uses are for governance, staking to become a validator, and participating in ecosystem incentives, rather than paying for gas fees.

QWhat controversy surrounded the pre-deposit events for the mainnet launch?

AThe controversy involved allegations of 'rat trading' where a top wallet deposited hundreds of millions of USDT 23 minutes before the first pre-deposit phase officially opened. The second phase also experienced website slowdowns and crashes due to overwhelming traffic.

QAccording to the market data on Polymarket, what is the probability that Stable's FDV will exceed $2 billion after its first day of trading?

AAccording to Polymarket data, the probability that Stable's Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) will exceed $2 billion after its first day of trading is 85%.

QWhich major cryptocurrency exchanges have announced plans to list the STABLE token for spot trading, and which have not as of the article's publication?

AAs of the article's publication, Bitget, Backpack, and Bybit have announced they will list STABLE spot trading. Binance, Coinbase, and Korean exchanges have not made such announcements.

Bacaan Terkait

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

Menurut artikel ini, pendiri Pinduoduo, Huang Zheng, memandang bisnis inti platformnya sebagai "asuransi terbalik" yang berhubungan dengan ketidakpastian. Argumen utamanya adalah bahwa dalam kapitalisme tradisional, orang kaya mengumpulkan kekayaan dengan menanggung ketidakpastian (seperti risiko finansial) yang tak tertanggungkan bagi orang biasa, yang kemudian membayar premi (seperti melalui tabungan rendah bunga atau membeli produk mahal demi kepastian) untuk mengalihkan risiko tersebut. Uang mengalir dari bawah ke atas. Pinduoduo berusaha "membalikkan" aliran ini. Melalui fitur seperti "pembelian kelompok" dan penawaran waktu terbatas, platform ini mengumpulkan banyak niat pembelian yang tersebar menjadi permintaan agregat yang pasti dan besar dalam waktu singkat. Kepastian permintaan massal ini memungkinkan pabrik mengurangi risiko kelebihan produksi dan menurunkan harga, sehingga mengembalikan sebagian nilai (dalam bentuk diskon) ke konsumen. Namun, tantangan utama adalah janji atau niat beli individu tidak berharga karena mudah dibatalkan tanpa konsekuensi. Di sinilah kaitannya dengan blockchain muncul. Huang Zheng bertanya-tanya apakah teknologi blockchain, dengan kontrak pintar dan sifat terdesentralisasi, bisa menjadi solusi untuk membuat komitmen individu menjadi terikat, dapat dipercaya, dan dapat diberi harga. Kontrak pintar dapat mengunci janji beli dengan jaminan keuangan, sehingga pembatalan akan dikenakan penalti. Ini mengubah "keinginan membeli" menjadi janji yang dapat ditegakkan, memberikan kepastian yang dapat dipercaya pabrik tanpa perantara. Artikel tersebut juga menarik paralel dengan Bitcoin, menyebutkan dua jalan menciptakan kepastian: 1) **Jalan Pinduoduo**: mengumpulkan keinginan tersebar menjadi skala besar untuk menghilangkan ketidakpastian. 2) **Jalan Bitcoin**: mengunci aturan dalam kode yang tidak dapat diubah (seperti pasokan tetap), menggantikan kepercayaan pada manusia dengan kepercayaan pada aturan algoritmik. Kedua pendekatan memiliki trade-off: yang pertama membatasi kebebasan individu untuk koordinasi massa, yang kedua mengorbankan fleksibilitas aturan untuk kepastian absolut.

链捕手11m yang lalu

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

链捕手11m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

**Ringkasan: "Raja Penyimpanan yang Membangun Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Menjadi Orang Terkaya"** Artikel ini membahas kisah Zhu Yiming, pendiri dua raksasa chip memori Tiongkok: Gigadevice (GigaDevice) dan ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). Gigadevice (terdaftar di Shanghai dan Hong Kong), yang didirikan Zhu pada 2005, memulai bisnisnya dengan memanfaatkan celah pasar. Perusahaan ini mengembangkan bisnis utamanya di NOR Flash—jenis chip memori yang meski dianggap "kelas bawah" oleh raksasa seperti Samsung, tetap penting untuk aplikasi seperti mobil dan elektronik konsumen—hingga menguasai 20% pangsa pasar global (2025). Gigadevice kemudian mendiversifikasi ke Mikrokontroler (MCU), sensor, dan chip analog melalui akuisisi. Meski terdampak siklus industri, perusahaan ini tetap profitable dengan margin kotor stabil di atas 40% dan efisiensi biaya yang baik. Model bisnisnya adalah Fabless (tanpa pabrik fabrikasi). Namun, dalam industri chip memori yang sangat siklis dan kapital-intensif, model Fabless dianggap kurang tangguh. "Pemenang" sejarah seperti Samsung dan SK Hynix adalah perusahaan IDM (integrasi vertikal) yang mampu melakukan ekspansi "anti-siklus" dengan investasi besar saat industri lesu. Menyadari batasan Gigadevice, Zhu Yiming pada 2016 bekerja sama dengan pemerintah Hefei mendirikan CXMT dengan model IDM untuk memproduksi DRAM canggih. Keputusan Zhu untuk memimpin CXMT, menolak gaji hingga perusahaan untung, serta mendedikasikan sebagian besar insentif sahamnya untuk karyawan, membangun kepercayaan dan memungkinkan pendanaan besar dari negara dan bank. Hingga akhir 2025, nilai buku peralatan CXMT mencapai 169 miliar RMB, bahkan melebihi BYD. Meski kedua perusahaan yang dibangunnya—Gigadevice bernilai ~340 miliar RMB dan CXMT diproyeksikan bernilai triliunan RMB—Zhu Yiming hanya memiliki kurang dari 3% saham (tidak langsung) di CXMT dan sekitar 1% setelah IPO. Dengan perkiraan kekayaan kurang dari 50 miliar RMB, ia tidak akan masuk jajaran orang terkaya Tiongkok, menunjukkan pilihan strategisnya untuk membangun kerajaan industri daripada kekayaan pribadi.

marsbit18m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

marsbit18m yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

XRP Ledger kembali menjadi sorotan setelah data biaya menunjukkan biaya jaringan harian turun di bawah $400, menurut metrik yang dilacak oleh DefiLlama dan penjelajah ledger. Biaya rendah memang merupakan desain inti XRPL untuk transaksi murah, namun jumlah biaya yang dihasilkan juga dapat berfungsi sebagai salah satu indikator aktivitas jaringan dan permintaan. Data mingguan menunjukkan pembakaran biaya sekitar $3.100, menggarisbawahi kontras dengan jaringan seperti Ethereum dan Bitcoin. Bagi pendukung, biaya rendah berarti efisiensi dan aksesibilitas tetap terjaga. Bagi pengkritik, angka ini dapat memicu pertanyaan tentang apakah jaringan melihat permintaan bernilai tinggi yang memadai, terutama dalam narasi pembayaran dan adopsi perusahaan yang telah lama dikembangkan. Data on-chain ini memberi para pelaku pasar satu cara untuk menguji aktivitas transaksional yang bermakna. Penting untuk tidak menyimpulkan secara berlebihan. Satu hari dengan biaya rendah tidak berarti jaringan gagal atau penyelesaian transaksi terhenti. Ini adalah satu titik data dalam debat penggunaan XRPL dan menciptakan kontras dengan dorongan Ripple yang lebih luas ke RLUSD, pembayaran agen AI, dan infrastruktur penyelesaian perusahaan. Langkah selanjutnya adalah mengamati apakah angka biaya pulih, apakah jumlah transaksi menunjukkan cerita yang berbeda, dan apakah penjelajah asli XRPL seperti Bithomp mengonfirmasi tren yang sama. Cerita ini mencerminkan pergeseran dalam crypto di mana infrastruktur, utilitas token, dan data on-chain semakin penting, melampaui aksi harga jangka pendek.

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片