SEC says most crypto assets are not securities in new regulatory framework

ambcryptoDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-17Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-17

Abstrak

The U.S. SEC, in coordination with the CFTC, issued new guidance on March 17, 2026, clarifying that most crypto assets are not securities. The framework introduces a taxonomy classifying digital assets into five categories: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and digital securities. It emphasizes that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if involved in an investment contract, and that its regulatory status can change over time. The guidance also addresses staking, airdrops, mining, and asset wrapping, reducing uncertainty for market participants. This move signals improved regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC, providing clearer rules for builders, issuers, and investors.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a sweeping new interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, stating that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

Announced on 17 March 2026, the guidance marks one of the most significant regulatory developments in the U.S. crypto market in over a decade.

The move was issued in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, signaling a more unified approach to overseeing digital assets.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the interpretation aims to “draw clear lines in clear terms,” while acknowledging that earlier regulatory approaches had failed to provide sufficient clarity for market participants.

SEC introduces crypto asset taxonomy

At the center of the new framework is a formal classification system for digital assets. The SEC outlined five broad categories:

  • Digital commodities
  • Digital collectibles
  • Digital tools
  • Stablecoins
  • Digital securities

The taxonomy is designed to help market participants better understand how different types of crypto assets are treated under U.S. law, addressing a long-standing lack of consistent definitions across the industry.

Investment contracts can evolve—and end

A key element of the interpretation is the clarification that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if it is involved in an investment contract at some stage.

The SEC stated that a “non-security crypto asset” can become subject to securities laws through an investment contract, but that such arrangements can also cease over time.

This distinction introduces a more dynamic view of regulation, where an asset’s legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used.

Clarity on staking, airdrops, and mining

The guidance also addresses several core crypto activities that have previously existed in regulatory grey areas.

These include:

  • Airdrops
  • Protocol mining
  • Protocol staking
  • The wrapping of non-security crypto assets

By outlining how securities laws apply to these activities, the SEC is attempting to reduce uncertainty for developers, platforms, and users operating across decentralized networks.

SEC and CFTC align on oversight

The joint nature of the interpretation highlights growing coordination between the SEC and the CFTC, which have historically taken different approaches to crypto regulation.

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the guidance reflects a shared commitment to creating “workable, harmonized regulations” for the industry.

The alignment is expected to clarify jurisdictional boundaries, particularly between assets treated as commodities and those subject to securities laws.

Market implications

The interpretation is likely to have wide-ranging implications for the crypto industry.

For builders and issuers, the framework provides clearer guidance on structuring projects and token distributions. For investors, it offers greater transparency around how assets may be classified and regulated.

The SEC said the interpretation also serves as a bridge as Congress continues its efforts to establish a comprehensive framework for the crypto market through legislation.


Final Summary

  • The SEC has clarified that most crypto assets are not securities, introducing a formal taxonomy and addressing long-standing regulatory uncertainty.
  • The joint guidance with the CFTC signals a more coordinated and flexible approach to crypto oversight in the United States.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat is the main clarification provided by the SEC regarding crypto assets in the new framework?

AThe SEC clarified that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

QOn what date was this significant regulatory guidance announced?

AThe guidance was announced on 17 March 2026.

QWhat are the five broad categories in the SEC's new classification system for digital assets?

AThe five categories are: Digital commodities, Digital collectibles, Digital tools, Stablecoins, and Digital securities.

QAccording to the guidance, can a crypto asset's legal status change over time?

AYes, the guidance states that an asset's legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used, and that an investment contract arrangement can cease over time.

QWhich other U.S. regulatory agency did the SEC coordinate with to issue this joint interpretation?

AThe SEC issued the guidance in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Bacaan Terkait

Fujian Jinjiang, Sebuah Unicorn Super Penyimpanan yang Tumbuh dalam Diam

Perusahaan memori super unicorn Fujian Jinhua secara diam-diam bersembunyi di Jinjiang, Fujian, yang terkenal dengan sepatu olahraganya. Dulu, Jinhua adalah salah satu dari tiga basis chip memori domestik bersama Yangtze Memory dan ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), bahkan pernah menjadi yang paling menjanjikan. Namun, Jinhua menghadapi rintangan besar. Pada 2018, ia dimasukkan dalam daftar entitas oleh Departemen Perdagangan AS dan menghadapi tuduhan pidana, yang menghentikan produksinya selama hampir lima tahun. Baru pada Februari 2024, pengadilan federal AS membebaskannya dari semua tuduhan. Jinhua didirikan pada 2016 dengan misi nasional untuk mematahkan monopoli Samsung, SK Hynix, dan Micron di pasar DRAM. Perusahaan ini bekerja sama dengan United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) dari Taiwan. Chen Zhengkun, mantan eksekutif Micron, memimpin proyek ini sebagai CEO, didorong oleh mimpi mengembangkan teknologi DRAM secara mandiri. Meskipun pembangunan pabrik berjalan cepat, Micron menuduh UMC dan Jinhua mencuri rahasia dagangnya, memicu sengketa hukum panjang. Setelah dimasukkan dalam daftar entitas, Jinhua harus membangun kembali lini produksinya hampir dari nol dengan mengurangi ketergantungan pada teknologi AS, dipimpin oleh Chen yang dijuluki "penyihir hasil". Saat ini, Jinhua fokus pada pasar DRAM ceruk (niche) untuk perangkat seperti TV pintar dan router. Kapasitas produksinya mencapai sekitar 40.000 wafer 12 inci per bulan, dengan target 60.000 wafer pada 2026. Perusahaan memiliki lebih dari 1.000 paten. Meski bebas secara hukum, Jinhua masih berada dalam daftar entitas AS. Dukungan kuat dari pemerintah kota Jinjiang dan provinsi Fujian sangat penting bagi kelangsungan hidup Jinhua selama masa sulit. Kota yang secara tradisional mengandalkan tekstil dan makanan ini sekarang berinvestasi besar dalam industri sirkuit terpadu, dengan Jinhua sebagai pionir. Industri IC Jinjiang diperkirakan akan mencapai nilai output lebih dari 14 miliar yuan pada 2025. Dalam siklus super memori yang didorong oleh AI, meskipun skala Jinhua masih kecil dibandingkan raksasa global, kebangkitannya dari keterpurukan melambangkan ketahanan dan tekad dalam mengembangkan industri memori China.

marsbit2j yang lalu

Fujian Jinjiang, Sebuah Unicorn Super Penyimpanan yang Tumbuh dalam Diam

marsbit2j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片