Matrixport Research: Why Is the Altcoin Bull Market Absent? Supply Pressure and Token Unlocks Become Key Variables

MatrixportDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-06Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-06

Abstrak

Matrixport Research: Why the Altcoin Bull Market is Absent? Supply Pressure and Token Unlocks Emerge as Key Variables The anticipated altcoin rally has not materialized over the past year. Historically, Bitcoin's rise leads to capital overflow into altcoins, but this transmission mechanism has significantly weakened in the current cycle. Retail participation remains low, and many projects lack compelling narratives or real-world utility to drive market momentum. Persistent supply pressure is a primary constraint. Early investors continue to divest, and new token unlocks are constantly adding to the circulating supply. Since August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked, creating sustained selling pressure. This explains why altcoins have underperformed Bitcoin and failed to reach previous cycle highs. Despite the overall bearish sentiment, historical patterns suggest that large-scale unlocks can sometimes improve short-term liquidity and spark temporary rebounds. An upcoming $4.7 billion unlock, the third largest since August 2024, is expected next week. However, the current rebound appears to have started only about a week in advance, indicating its influence may be weaker than previous cycles. A key market indicator is the altcoin total market cap's deviation from its 90-day moving average. The market is potentially approaching an oversold zone, which could set the stage for a tactical rebound. In summary, the altcoin market faces a structur...

"Sustained supply pressure continues to be released, and the altcoin market is shifting from a structural bull market to cyclical trading opportunities."

Over the past year, the anticipated altcoin rally has failed to materialize as expected. In previous cycles, Bitcoin's rise typically drove capital overflow, gradually transmitting to altcoin sectors. However, in this cycle, this transmission mechanism has significantly weakened. Retail participation remains consistently low, with many projects lacking compelling new narratives to drive the market or providing solutions with real-world application value. At the same time, continuous selling by early investors and the new supply brought by token unlocks are constantly putting pressure on the market. Against this backdrop, altcoins have continued to underperform, and investor sentiment is generally dampened. However, the market still features some periodically strong performers, and such opportunities can often be identified through certain market structure signals.

Sustained Supply Pressure: Altcoin Rally Momentum is Limited

Since October 2025, although Bitcoin has experienced periodic pullbacks, the market dominance has not significantly declined and has recently rebounded to new highs. This round of market action seems more like it is led by Bitcoin, driving altcoins to follow with periodic gains. At the same time, more and more companies adopting treasury allocation strategies continue to accumulate Bitcoin, keeping its structural demand stable.

In comparison, altcoins face more obvious supply pressure. Early investors continue to release their holdings, coupled with the new circulating supply brought by token unlocks, frequently limiting the market's upside during rebounds. Since August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked and entered circulation, bringing sustained supply shock to the market.

As retail participation enthusiasm cools, the supply side's impact has gradually become the key variable dominating price trends. This also explains why in this bull market from 2024 to 2025, altcoins have not only underperformed Bitcoin, but their overall market capitalization has even failed to reach the highs of this cycle.

Unlock Windows and Market Structure: Periodic Rebounds Are Still Possible

Historical experience shows that large-scale token unlocks often improve market liquidity in the short term and drive a rebound in trading activity. In many cases, altcoins experience periodic rebounds around unlock windows. This is due to both the improved承接 capacity brought by increased trading volume and the reallocation of capital within the sector.

Next week is expected to see about $4.7 billion in token unlocks, making it the third largest unlock week since August 2024. Historical data shows that in unlock windows of similar scale, the crypto market often rebounds in the weeks before the unlock, while the overall market capitalization tends to peak shortly after the unlock.

However, this rebound seems to have started only about a week in advance, indicating its influence may be weaker than previous instances. This round of unlocks is mainly concentrated in a few protocols, the vast majority of which come from the platform token WhiteBIT Coin from the European crypto exchange WhiteBIT. Although the token's fully diluted valuation (FDV) is about $16.6 billion, its average daily trading volume is only about $74 million, meaning a relatively limited trading scale, which could also lead to disproportionate price volatility.

Based on comprehensive historical experience, a more practical market indicator is the degree of deviation of the total altcoin market capitalization relative to its 90-day moving average. When the total market cap is more than 50% above the 90-day average, the market usually enters a period of阶段性过热区间; when it is about 30% below the 90-day average, tactical rebounds are more likely to occur. The current market structure suggests that the selling pressure on altcoins may be gradually approaching an over-released zone.

Overall, the altcoin market is at a critical juncture. Structurally, this sector still faces a dual pressure: on one hand, overall retail demand is weak; on the other hand, token unlocks and early investor selling continue to pressure the supply side. This structural characteristic has significantly weakened the traditional transmission path of "Bitcoin's rise driving altcoin gains" in this cycle.

The above views are from Matrix on Target, contact us to get the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QAccording to the Matrixport report, why has the altcoin bull market been absent despite Bitcoin's rise?

AThe altcoin bull market has been absent primarily due to persistent supply pressures from continuous token unlocks and early investors' sustained selling, which have created structural headwinds. Additionally, the traditional mechanism where Bitcoin's rise leads to capital overflow into altcoins has significantly weakened in this cycle.

QWhat is the estimated amount of tokens that have been unlocked and entered circulation since August 2024, as mentioned in the report?

ASince August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked and entered circulation, creating a persistent supply shock for the market.

QWhat historical pattern is often observed around large-scale token unlock events for altcoins?

AHistorically, altcoins often experience a阶段性反弹 (phase-specific rebound) around large-scale unlock windows. Trading activity and liquidity often improve in the short term, with altcoin prices tending to反弹 (rebound) in the weeks before the unlock and the total market cap often reaching a short-term peak shortly after the unlock.

QWhat key market indicator does the report suggest is practical for identifying potential tactical rebounds in the altcoin market?

AA practical market indicator is the degree of deviation of the total altcoin market capitalization from its 90-day moving average. The market is more likely to see a tactical rebound when the total market cap is about 30% below this 90-day average.

QWhat is the primary reason the traditional 'Bitcoin rise leads to altcoin catch-up' transmission path has weakened in the current cycle?

AThis traditional transmission path has weakened due to a combination of persistently weak retail participation and sustained selling pressure on the supply side from token unlocks and early investor distributions, creating a structural characteristic that limits altcoin performance.

Bacaan Terkait

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

Menurut artikel ini, pendiri Pinduoduo, Huang Zheng, memandang bisnis inti platformnya sebagai "asuransi terbalik" yang berhubungan dengan ketidakpastian. Argumen utamanya adalah bahwa dalam kapitalisme tradisional, orang kaya mengumpulkan kekayaan dengan menanggung ketidakpastian (seperti risiko finansial) yang tak tertanggungkan bagi orang biasa, yang kemudian membayar premi (seperti melalui tabungan rendah bunga atau membeli produk mahal demi kepastian) untuk mengalihkan risiko tersebut. Uang mengalir dari bawah ke atas. Pinduoduo berusaha "membalikkan" aliran ini. Melalui fitur seperti "pembelian kelompok" dan penawaran waktu terbatas, platform ini mengumpulkan banyak niat pembelian yang tersebar menjadi permintaan agregat yang pasti dan besar dalam waktu singkat. Kepastian permintaan massal ini memungkinkan pabrik mengurangi risiko kelebihan produksi dan menurunkan harga, sehingga mengembalikan sebagian nilai (dalam bentuk diskon) ke konsumen. Namun, tantangan utama adalah janji atau niat beli individu tidak berharga karena mudah dibatalkan tanpa konsekuensi. Di sinilah kaitannya dengan blockchain muncul. Huang Zheng bertanya-tanya apakah teknologi blockchain, dengan kontrak pintar dan sifat terdesentralisasi, bisa menjadi solusi untuk membuat komitmen individu menjadi terikat, dapat dipercaya, dan dapat diberi harga. Kontrak pintar dapat mengunci janji beli dengan jaminan keuangan, sehingga pembatalan akan dikenakan penalti. Ini mengubah "keinginan membeli" menjadi janji yang dapat ditegakkan, memberikan kepastian yang dapat dipercaya pabrik tanpa perantara. Artikel tersebut juga menarik paralel dengan Bitcoin, menyebutkan dua jalan menciptakan kepastian: 1) **Jalan Pinduoduo**: mengumpulkan keinginan tersebar menjadi skala besar untuk menghilangkan ketidakpastian. 2) **Jalan Bitcoin**: mengunci aturan dalam kode yang tidak dapat diubah (seperti pasokan tetap), menggantikan kepercayaan pada manusia dengan kepercayaan pada aturan algoritmik. Kedua pendekatan memiliki trade-off: yang pertama membatasi kebebasan individu untuk koordinasi massa, yang kedua mengorbankan fleksibilitas aturan untuk kepastian absolut.

链捕手12m yang lalu

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

链捕手12m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

**Ringkasan: "Raja Penyimpanan yang Membangun Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Menjadi Orang Terkaya"** Artikel ini membahas kisah Zhu Yiming, pendiri dua raksasa chip memori Tiongkok: Gigadevice (GigaDevice) dan ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). Gigadevice (terdaftar di Shanghai dan Hong Kong), yang didirikan Zhu pada 2005, memulai bisnisnya dengan memanfaatkan celah pasar. Perusahaan ini mengembangkan bisnis utamanya di NOR Flash—jenis chip memori yang meski dianggap "kelas bawah" oleh raksasa seperti Samsung, tetap penting untuk aplikasi seperti mobil dan elektronik konsumen—hingga menguasai 20% pangsa pasar global (2025). Gigadevice kemudian mendiversifikasi ke Mikrokontroler (MCU), sensor, dan chip analog melalui akuisisi. Meski terdampak siklus industri, perusahaan ini tetap profitable dengan margin kotor stabil di atas 40% dan efisiensi biaya yang baik. Model bisnisnya adalah Fabless (tanpa pabrik fabrikasi). Namun, dalam industri chip memori yang sangat siklis dan kapital-intensif, model Fabless dianggap kurang tangguh. "Pemenang" sejarah seperti Samsung dan SK Hynix adalah perusahaan IDM (integrasi vertikal) yang mampu melakukan ekspansi "anti-siklus" dengan investasi besar saat industri lesu. Menyadari batasan Gigadevice, Zhu Yiming pada 2016 bekerja sama dengan pemerintah Hefei mendirikan CXMT dengan model IDM untuk memproduksi DRAM canggih. Keputusan Zhu untuk memimpin CXMT, menolak gaji hingga perusahaan untung, serta mendedikasikan sebagian besar insentif sahamnya untuk karyawan, membangun kepercayaan dan memungkinkan pendanaan besar dari negara dan bank. Hingga akhir 2025, nilai buku peralatan CXMT mencapai 169 miliar RMB, bahkan melebihi BYD. Meski kedua perusahaan yang dibangunnya—Gigadevice bernilai ~340 miliar RMB dan CXMT diproyeksikan bernilai triliunan RMB—Zhu Yiming hanya memiliki kurang dari 3% saham (tidak langsung) di CXMT dan sekitar 1% setelah IPO. Dengan perkiraan kekayaan kurang dari 50 miliar RMB, ia tidak akan masuk jajaran orang terkaya Tiongkok, menunjukkan pilihan strategisnya untuk membangun kerajaan industri daripada kekayaan pribadi.

marsbit18m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

marsbit18m yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

XRP Ledger kembali menjadi sorotan setelah data biaya menunjukkan biaya jaringan harian turun di bawah $400, menurut metrik yang dilacak oleh DefiLlama dan penjelajah ledger. Biaya rendah memang merupakan desain inti XRPL untuk transaksi murah, namun jumlah biaya yang dihasilkan juga dapat berfungsi sebagai salah satu indikator aktivitas jaringan dan permintaan. Data mingguan menunjukkan pembakaran biaya sekitar $3.100, menggarisbawahi kontras dengan jaringan seperti Ethereum dan Bitcoin. Bagi pendukung, biaya rendah berarti efisiensi dan aksesibilitas tetap terjaga. Bagi pengkritik, angka ini dapat memicu pertanyaan tentang apakah jaringan melihat permintaan bernilai tinggi yang memadai, terutama dalam narasi pembayaran dan adopsi perusahaan yang telah lama dikembangkan. Data on-chain ini memberi para pelaku pasar satu cara untuk menguji aktivitas transaksional yang bermakna. Penting untuk tidak menyimpulkan secara berlebihan. Satu hari dengan biaya rendah tidak berarti jaringan gagal atau penyelesaian transaksi terhenti. Ini adalah satu titik data dalam debat penggunaan XRPL dan menciptakan kontras dengan dorongan Ripple yang lebih luas ke RLUSD, pembayaran agen AI, dan infrastruktur penyelesaian perusahaan. Langkah selanjutnya adalah mengamati apakah angka biaya pulih, apakah jumlah transaksi menunjukkan cerita yang berbeda, dan apakah penjelajah asli XRPL seperti Bithomp mengonfirmasi tren yang sama. Cerita ini mencerminkan pergeseran dalam crypto di mana infrastruktur, utilitas token, dan data on-chain semakin penting, melampaui aksi harga jangka pendek.

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片