Beyond the 'Kimchi Premium': Institutional Transformation in Korea

cryptonews.ruDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-08-22Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-08-22

Abstrak

South Korea's crypto landscape is moving beyond the volatile "Kimchi Premium" era driven by retail speculation, according to Andrew Park, CEO of Factblock. Park, who organizes Korea Blockchain Week, notes a significant shift in the nature of international inquiries. Global institutions are now focusing on market access, asset custody, tokenization, stablecoins, and regulatory compliance, rather than just token listings and prices. This institutionalization is being built through foundational, "unsexy" back-office work: developing corporate crypto accounts, legal finality for settlements, accounting standards, and custody solutions. Key regulatory steps include the Financial Services Commission's framework for corporate virtual asset accounts and National Assembly amendments to laws governing tokenized securities and real-world assets. Park, with a traditional finance background, bridges the perspectives of Wall Street and Web3. He explains that traditional banks prioritize managing edge-case failures and regulatory reporting, which crypto-native firms sometimes misunderstand. Conversely, traditional financiers often overlook blockchain's systemic utility for 24/7 global settlement and programmable money. Looking ahead, Park sees South Korea's next frontier at the intersection of AI and programmable blockchain infrastructure. He is particularly interested in the infrastructure needed for a "machine-to-machine" economy, where AI agents could autonomously conduct micropayment...

For years, the global crypto ecosystem viewed South Korea through the lens of a single, extremely volatile phenomenon: the "kimchi premium." It was a market defined by sleepless retail day traders pushing token prices to extreme markups compared to global averages. Today, that picture is rapidly fading into the past.

The driving force behind this shift is Andrew Park, CEO of Factblock and organizer of Korea Blockchain Week. Park, who has two decades of experience in traditional finance before transitioning to Web3, previously held senior positions at Seoul Guarantee Insurance, Woori Card, JPMorgan Chase, Visa, and American Express.

From his vantage point at the intersection of traditional banking and digital assets, South Korea is gradually shedding its image as a speculative "sandbox" for retail investors and transforming into a hub and proving ground for institutional digital finance.

According to Park, the most vivid evidence of Korea's evolution is to be found not in exchange trading volumes, but in the questions coming from abroad into boardrooms.

"Just a few years ago, global companies coming to Korea were mostly interested in tokens, exchanges, and market prices," said Park. "Today the questions are different. International financial institutions and companies are interested in asset custody, tokenization, stablecoins, payments and settlement infrastructure, regulation, and how to enter the Korean market. I believe the very fact that the nature of the conversation has changed is an important signal that the nature of the market is also changing."

This shift reflects a fundamental change in how global capital perceives the region. Where international projects once saw Seoul as a highly liquid venue for listing assets and offloading inventory to retail buyers, global banks, custodians, and asset managers now see the country as a jurisdiction ready for deploying corporate-grade projects. The dialogue has moved from speculative returns to questions of market access, compliance with legal frameworks, and institutional custody services — the structural underpinnings of traditional capital markets.

The Quiet, Meticulous Work of Back-Office Infrastructure

While crypto markets are routinely fed by loud regulatory headlines and sudden speculative surges, Park emphasizes that true institutionalization isn't born in volatile rallies. On the contrary, it is built through quiet, unglamorous toil — the methodical, step-by-step resolution of back-office issues, regulatory compliance, and market infrastructure development.

"Institutional markets aren't created by one big announcement," Park said. "They emerge when the less exciting questions, like account access, asset custody, payments and settlements, accounting, and regulatory compliance, start getting addressed one by one. In Korea, these foundations are now beginning to develop in tandem."

This unglamorous "plumbing" is being created on many regulatory and policy fronts. For example, the Financial Services Commission has developed a framework for opening corporate virtual asset accounts for roughly 3,500 listed companies and registered professional investors.

Furthermore, the National Assembly has officially adopted amendments to the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act, bringing tokenized real-world assets and security tokens under a unified regulatory framework. For its part, the Bank of Korea has completed initial testing of its real-deposit tokenization initiatives — under the 'Hangang' project — paving the way for a second phase of institutional testing.

Rather than waiting for a single comprehensive digital asset law, South Korea is creating institutional-grade liquidity by tackling complex back-office questions: legally final settlement, accounting definitions, and institutional custody.

Park's experience at JPMorgan Chase, Visa, and Samsung Card gives him a nuanced understanding of the friction points slowing convergence between Wall Street, Yeouido (Seoul's financial district), and Web3. While crypto founders often see traditional banks as technologically incompetent or deliberately slow, Park notes that banking software is built upon a fundamentally different set of operational priorities.

"The crypto side often misunderstands banks. Banks aren't slow simply because they don't understand technology," Park explained. "In traditional finance, what often matters most isn't the 99% of transactions that go through smoothly, but what happens with the remaining 1%. Who is liable in case of fraud? What happens when a payment fails? How is capital and liquidity management handled? What needs to be reported to regulators? All these questions must be built into the system from the ground up."

The 'Machine-to-Machine' Economy: AI Meets On-Chain Settlement

Conversely, traditional financiers often suffer from the opposite form of "tunnel vision": they evaluate digital assets solely through the lens of price volatility. By focusing exclusively on market risk, traditional institutions often overlook the systemic utility of 24/7 global settlement networks, programmable money, and smart contract-based clearing architectures.

In Park's view, the future of institutional finance in Korea belongs neither to Web3 startups trying to replace traditional banks, nor to conservative financial institutions ignoring public blockchains. Instead, it belongs to the "bridges" capable of managing that 1% failure rate directly on-chain.

Looking beyond bank-issued tokenized securities and stablecoins, Park sees the next significant phase of South Korea's development being shaped at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and programmable infrastructure.

"What interests me most is the infrastructure needed for a 'machine-to-machine' economy, specifically an environment where AI agents can autonomously transact and make payments," said Park. "If an AI agent needs to pay another agent or for a service, it will need a wallet and a method of payment... In an environment where a large number of AI agents are acquiring data, consuming compute resources, and making micro-payments in real-time, there may be areas where existing payment infrastructure becomes inefficient. This is one reason why stablecoins and on-chain payments could become important use cases."

This theoretical shift is already undergoing early-stage testing. In technical experiments related to the Bank of Korea's initiatives, researchers tested AI agent models using wholesale deposit tokens to execute automated conditional transactions. With near-ubiquitous high-speed internet access, high digital literacy, and active investment in both Web3 infrastructure and AI development, South Korea holds a unique position.

The next phase of the Korean market's development won't just be about institutional traders buying digital assets — it will be about autonomous software agents using on-chain settlement mechanisms as their primary monetary network.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat is driving the fundamental shift in South Korea's crypto landscape, according to the article?

AThe fundamental shift is being driven by a move away from the speculative 'Kimchi Premium' retail-focused market towards becoming a hub for institutional digital finance. This shift is evidenced by changing conversations with global companies, who are now more interested in asset custody, tokenization, stablecoins, regulatory frameworks, and market access rather than just token prices and exchanges.

QAccording to Andrew Park, where should we look for the most telling evidence of South Korea's evolution in the crypto space?

AAccording to Andrew Park, the most telling evidence of South Korea's evolution should not be sought in exchange trading volumes, but rather in the questions now coming from abroad to corporate boardrooms. The nature of inquiries has shifted from tokens and prices to institutional concerns like custody, tokenization, and compliance.

QHow is institutionalization being built in South Korea's market, as described by Andrew Park?

AInstitutionalization is being built through quiet, unglamorous groundwork and back-office work. It involves methodically solving problems related to account access, asset custody, payments and settlement, accounting, and regulatory compliance. This foundational infrastructure is being developed step-by-step across multiple regulatory and policy fronts rather than through a single, sweeping law.

QWhat does Andrew Park identify as the key misunderstanding cryptocurrency founders often have about traditional banks?

ACryptocurrency founders often mistakenly believe banks are slow because they don't understand technology. Park explains that in traditional finance, the operational priority is managing the 1% of transactions that go wrong—issues of fraud liability, failed payments, capital management, and regulatory reporting—which must be designed into systems from the start, leading to a different development pace.

QWhat future development stage does Andrew Park envision for South Korea, involving AI and blockchain?

AAndrew Park envisions the next important phase for South Korea lies at the intersection of AI and programmable infrastructure, specifically the infrastructure needed for a 'machine-to-machine' economy. This involves environments where AI agents can autonomously transact and make payments, requiring wallets and payment methods, which could make on-chain stablecoin payments and settlements crucial use cases.

Bacaan Terkait

Mengapa Bitcoin Benar-Benar Naik Sangat Tinggi? Apakah Siklus Empat Tahun Cukup? Inilah Pendapat Caitlin Long

Setelah kenaikan mendadak dan tajam di pasar kripto, Caitlin Long, pendiri dan CEO Custodia Bank serta tokoh terkemuka di pasar, menilai aktivitas baru-baru ini di pasar Bitcoin dan pasar keuangan secara keseluruhan. Long menyatakan bahwa di balik lonjakan tajam di pasar terdapat alasan makroekonomi dan tindakan Departemen Keuangan AS. Mengomentari pernyataan Departemen Keuangan AS yang akan lebih dari dua kali lipat meningkatkan pembelian obligasi jangka panjang (obligasi Treasury 30 tahun), Long menyebutnya sebagai bentuk "pengendalian kurva imbal hasil". Langkah ini secara langsung memicu perubahan drastis dalam suku bunga dan memberikan tekanan pada dolar AS, melemahkannya. Melemahnya dolar umumnya mendukung aset berisiko, yang menyebabkan lonjakan tajam pada kripto utama seperti Bitcoin dan Ethereum. Menanggapi pertanyaan yang sering dibahas di pasar belakangan ini, "Apakah siklus 4 tahun telah berakhir?", Long menyatakan bahwa grafik dan data fundamental menunjukkan bahwa siklus masih berlangsung. Proses dinamika inti dalam ekonomi penambangan tidak berubah; penurunan profitabilitas dan keluarnya dari pasar karena biaya listrik dan komputasi yang tinggi adalah bagian alami dari siklus. Long, yang menahan diri dari memprediksi harga, menyatakan bahwa berdasarkan pengalaman masa lalu, Bitcoin tampak murah pada level saat ini. *Ini bukan rekomendasi investasi.

cryptonews.ru32m yang lalu

Mengapa Bitcoin Benar-Benar Naik Sangat Tinggi? Apakah Siklus Empat Tahun Cukup? Inilah Pendapat Caitlin Long

cryptonews.ru32m yang lalu

Perusahaan HumidiFi Menangguhkan Perdagangan setelah Terjadi Insiden Keamanan di Jaringannya, Klaim Pengaruhnya Terbatas pada Dana Internal

Platform pertukaran terdesentralisasi HumidiFi di Solana telah menghentikan sementara semua aktivitas perdagangan setelah melaporkan insiden keamanan dalam jaringannya. Perusahaan menyatakan bahwa kerusakan terbatas pada dana internal mereka sendiri dan tidak mempengaruhi aset klien atau pihak ketiga. HumidiFi mengumumkan melalui akun X resmi bahwa bagian dari jaringan internalnya mengalami insiden, dengan penyelidikan masih berlangsung. Meskipun perdagangan dihentikan, perusahaan tidak memberikan detail lebih lanjut tentang insiden tersebut, tidak secara resmi menyebutnya peretasan, atau mengungkapkan perkiraan kerugian finansial. Data dari DefiLlama menunjukkan HumidiFi menangani volume perdagangan sekitar $213,79 juta dalam 24 jam terakhir. Token asli platform, WET, mengalami peningkatan volume perdagangan 192% menjadi sekitar $5,49 juta, meski harganya turun 8,66%. Insiden ini terjadi setelah penjualan token HumidiFi di platform Jupiter dibatalkan karena didominasi oleh dompet otomatis yang mencurigakan. Sebelum pembatalan, penjualan telah mengumpulkan $1,39 juta. Tim berjanji akan meluncurkan kembali penjualan token dan mendistribusikannya secara proporsional kepada pembeli yang bonafide. Laporan dari Cryptopolitan menunjukkan peningkatan investigasi keamanan di sektor aset digital pada kuartal kedua 2026, dengan sekitar 83 insiden terpisah yang menyebabkan kerugian sekitar $775 juta.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Perusahaan HumidiFi Menangguhkan Perdagangan setelah Terjadi Insiden Keamanan di Jaringannya, Klaim Pengaruhnya Terbatas pada Dana Internal

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片