SEC Cracks Down On Brothers Behind $60 Million Crypto Ponzi Scheme – Details

bitcoinistDipublikasikan tanggal 2024-08-27Terakhir diperbarui pada 2024-08-27

Abstrak

The US Securities and Exchange Commission charged today brothers Jonathan and Tanner Adam with running a $60 million Ponzi scheme...

The US Securities and Exchange Commission charged today brothers Jonathan and Tanner Adam with running a $60 million Ponzi scheme under the cover of a cryptocurrency investment opportunity.

This August 27, 2024-dated case shows that challenges continue to be afoot for investors in the fast, wild world of cryptocurrencies. The brothers were said to have promised unbelievable value returns, which lured more than 80 investors into their scheme of a high-flyer trading bot that never truly existed.

The Scheme Unraveled

The complaint by the SEC alleges that between January of 2023 and June of this year, the Adams reported their proprietary bot had monthly returns of 13.5%. They told investors their money would be used in a “lending pool,” where flash loans would buy securities and sell for easy profits.

According to the SEC, the trading bot was a mirage, and the trading strategy a fabricated scheme. The brothers are further accused of not using the money in investment. Instead, the two allegedly deflected most of the money for their expensive lifestyles, the most noticeable being two luxury vehicles and a multi-million dollar condominium.

Luxury Life Through Fraud

The United States Lawyers Office reports that out of the $ 61.5 million, $53.9 million was diverted by the Adams. They spent the money on extravagant purchases hence investors ended up receiving less than what they had invested.

Most of the money was used to pay earlier investors, Ponzi-style, a telltale indication of a scam. The SEC moved to freeze the assets of the brothers and also sought permanent injunctions of their companies, GCZ Global, LLC, and Triten Financial Group LLC.

Total crypto market cap at $2.16 trillion on the daily chart: TradingView.com

Background Hidden

Now, the case becomes murkier with the shocking disclosure of the background of Jonathan Adam. He is also said to have fabricated his background to charm investors, covering up three past convictions for securities fraud.

The pretense escalated the more serious charges against him and his brother. It was a “virtually nonexistent” risk, they told the investors, compounding the betrayal of trust.

Indeed, the work done by the SEC stands as a powerful reminder of the risks investors take in crypto, particularly in a market rife with scams.

More Broad-Based Consequences For Crypto Investments

This isn’t a case of the Adams but rather a broader reflection of the cryptocurrency sphere. According to blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, in 2022 alone, a total of $7.8 billion was pocketed by Ponzi actors and other rackets globally.

The SEC crackdown on the Adams indicates just how careful investors must be when spending and doing due diligence before investing money. With multiple cryptocurrencies still maturing into the market, potential fraud is huge.

The speedy prosecution of the case goes back to its concern of providing protection to the investor and maintaining market integrity. As the crypto landscape continues to grow, regulatory oversight increases all the more in importance.

It becomes incumbent on investors to remain vigilant in order to wade through this complex and often dangerous landscape. The charges against Jonathan and Tanner Adam serve notice to those who feel tempted to invest in cryptocurrency and other online investment opportunities that, indeed, all that glitters is not gold.

Featured image from Entrepreneur, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Bacaan Terkait

Mengapa Asuransi DeFi Tidak Laku?

"DeFi Asuransi: Mengapa Tidak Ada yang Membelinya?" Asuransi DeFi dirancang untuk menghilangkan perantara dengan pembayaran klaim otomatis melalui kontrak pintar. Namun, pada kenyataannya, hampir tidak ada yang membelinya. Alasan utamanya adalah biaya premi yang terlalu tinggi. Premi asuransi bisa mencapai 1.5%–6%, yang secara signifikan menggerus keuntungan tahunan dari platform seperti Aave atau Compound (biasanya 3%-4%). Akibatnya, laba bersih pengguna menjadi sangat rendah, bahkan bisa negatif. Risiko di DeFi juga sangat terkait. Satu insiden keamanan (seperti peretasan protokol atau kegagalan oracle) dapat mempengaruhi banyak platform sekaligus. Kolam asuransi DeFi saat ini, dengan total aset hanya sekitar puluhan juta dolar, tidak cukup untuk menanggung kerugian besar seperti peretasan miliaran dolar. Selain itu, model keputusan klaim seperti di Nexus Mutual, di mana pemegang token memutuskan klaim, dapat menciptakan bias untuk menolak pembayaran. Kapasitas asuransi seluruh industri sangat kecil dibandingkan dengan total aset terkunci di DeFi yang mencapai ratusan miliar dolar. Solusi yang muncul berfokus pada pencegahan (seperti program bug bounty) dan mencoba menarik modal reasuransi tradisional, mengakui bahwa dana di dalam ekosistem saja tidak cukup. Intinya, asuransi DeFi saat ini menghadapi paradoks: semua orang butuh perlindungan, tetapi biayanya membuatnya tidak menarik, dan tidak ada yang bisa memaksa pengguna untuk membelinya, sehingga meninggalkan pasar rentan terhadap risiko sistemik.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Mengapa Asuransi DeFi Tidak Laku?

marsbit3j yang lalu

Dompet Cardano Dihantam Eksploitasi SecondFi Akibat Cacat Kunci Pribadi Picu Peringatan Keamanan

SecondFi, sebelumnya terkait dengan merek dompet Yoroi, menangguhkan layanannya setelah cacat kritis dalam perangkat lunak pembuatan dompet berbasis web mereka melaporkan mengekspos kunci privat dan mengakibatkan pencurian ADA besar. Insiden ini memicu peringatan mendesak bagi pengguna yang terdampak, namun sumber yang divalidasi menegaskan satu poin penting: ini bukanlah peretasan terhadap protokol blockchain Cardano itu sendiri. Kerentanan terletak pada proses pembuatan kunci privat di perangkat lunak dompet web SecondFi. Perkiraan awal menyebutkan 16 juta ADA dicuri dari 374 dompet, bernilai sekitar $2,4 juta. Firma keamanan SlowMist memperingatkan dampak totalnya bisa melebihi 129 juta ADA (lebih dari $20 juta). Jaringan Cardano sendiri tidak diretas; masalahnya terlokalisir pada perangkat lunak SecondFi. Peringatan keselamatan terkuat bagi pengguna yang terdampak adalah untuk TIDAK memulihkan frase seed yang telah dikompromikan ke dalam dompet lain, karena kunci privatnya sendiri mungkin telah bocor. Pengguna juga diperingatkan terhadap tautan pemulihan tidak resmi atau platform pengembalian dana pihak ketiga yang sering muncul pasca-eksploitasi. Insiden ini menjadi pengingat bahwa keamanan blockchain tidak berakhir di lapisan protokol. Proses pembuatan dompet, antarmuka berbasis browser, dan penanganan frase seed bisa menjadi titik kegagalan kritis. Fokus saat ini adalah membantu pengguna terdampak menghindari eksposur lebih lanjut sementara cakupan akhir insiden dikonfirmasi.

bitcoinist3j yang lalu

Dompet Cardano Dihantam Eksploitasi SecondFi Akibat Cacat Kunci Pribadi Picu Peringatan Keamanan

bitcoinist3j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片