White Supremacists Lean On Crypto, Says Anti-Defamation League Report on Extremists

CoinDeskPolicyDipublikasikan tanggal 2024-01-11Terakhir diperbarui pada 2024-01-12

Abstrak

The report says white supremacist groups are drawn to crypto funding, but the amounts are relatively small, and it doesn't make a case that digital assets are paying for illeg...

White supremacist groups in the U.S. have sometimes been funded by crypto, according to a report from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that analyzed about $140,000 in transactions connected to 15 extremist groups or individuals last year.

The ADL, a New York-base advocacy group that counters antisemitism and extremism, focused on the movement of bitcoin, and saw that supporters used a wide array of digital assets platforms to get money in the hands of hate groups, though there was no assertion that the money was directly used for illegal action, such as domestic terrorism. And the review suggested the bitcoin received from supporters was often shifted back into the traditional financial system via U.S. banks.

10

"Extremists have increasingly turned to cryptocurrency due to the mistaken belief that the technology offers anonymity and is impervious to deplatforming," noted the report from the ADL's Center on Extremism, examining how the assets made their way into the hands of white nationalists. "Neither of these assumptions are accurate, but extremists have benefited from the lenient practices of cryptocurrency platforms, which often allow extremists to use their services."

Advertisement
Advertisement

About half of the transactions tracked by the ADL went through U.S. exchange Kraken, with others flowing through Binance, Coinbase and other platforms, according to the report. The biggest recipient was white nationalist publishing operation Counter-Currents.

The ADL recommends the crypto companies "update their policies to explicitly prohibit the use of their cryptocurrency exchanges to fund hate and extremism-related activities." It also suggested regulators should limit tokens that aim to shield privacy.

"Continued vigilance in the cryptocurrency space, as well as other financial technology spaces, and responsible moderation by the underlying platforms, are needed to combat the financial elements of this rise in antisemitism, extremism and hate," the organization concluded in its report.

Exchanges push back

For their part, crypto exchanges argue that they're combating illegality and that cryptocurrency transactions are often conducted in plain sight – unlike in banking.

A Kraken spokesperson said the company is disappointed the ADL wrote its report "without engaging us in any dialogue" about its know-your-customer policies and money laundering protections.

"Kraken is vigilant in enforcing these policies and taking proactive steps to prevent Kraken's services from being used as a vehicle for money laundering, terrorist financing or any other illicit activity," the spokesperson said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Similarly, Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad responded that the company "does not tolerate any illegal activity – of any size – on or using the Coinbase exchange," adding that "our terms of service make this clear."

Shirzad said that the U.S. exchange is under "clear rules around anti-money laundering and sanctions that apply to fiat and crypto." He said the report erred in its "failure to differentiate law-abiding, regulated US exchanges from offshore companies that have served as major hubs for illegal activity," and he added that case is still the preferred medium for criminals who "want to avoid the transparent nature of the blockchain."

While the crypto firms defended their efforts to stave off illegality, the report didn't make specific accusations about the money funding illicit activity.

Extremist groups also rely on the traditional financial system, from online payments to credit cards to bank accounts, where the transparency the ADL used in its review isn't publicly available. But banning the groups from the mainstream financial network tends to raise questions of censorship.

Banks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. have given large amounts of money to anti-hate groups including the Anti-Defamation League. But the banks' internal programs to review customers who have ties to extremist organizations are difficult to assess from the outside.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Bacaan Terkait

Akses ke Sesi Aktif Alih-alih Basis Data: Bagaimana Pasar Gelap di Rusia Berubah

Pasar gelap di Rusia telah bergeser prioritasnya: dari menjual basis data massal yang dicuri dari korporasi, kini pelaku kejahatan memperdagangkan akses aktif jangka pendek ke akun pengguna. Nilai informasi yang dicegat oleh perangkat lunak berbahaya langsung dari komputer dan ponsel yang terinfeksi tumbuh hampir 13% dalam setahun terakhir, dengan pengguna Rusia mencapai 14–18% dari segmen ini. Berbeda dengan arsip usang, paket data baru berisi alat untuk infiltrasi instan ke lingkungan digital individu, seperti token sesi aktif yang memungkinkan login tanpa kata sandi, kata sandi aktif, akses langsung ke email, kredensial layanan VPN dan penyimpanan cloud, serta akses administratif ke jaringan perusahaan. Paket data lama dijual hanya $10–15, sementara langganan saluran tertutup dengan data segar harian berharga $250–300 per bulan, menunjukkan pasar lebih menghargai kemutakhiran daripada volume. Statistik resmi menciptakan ilusi kontrol penuh. Meski regulator berhasil menindak perusahaan untuk kebocoran data dari penyimpanan terpusat—dengan denda dan investigasi administratif—langkah ini tidak efektif terhadap model ancaman baru. Malware mencuri data setelah meninggalkan perimeter perusahaan dan berada di perangkat pribadi, sehingga basis data korporat secara formal tidak terganggu dan mekanisme regulasi tidak berlaku. Kerentanan infrastruktur korporat meningkat: token sesi yang dicuri seringkali dapat menghindari autentikasi ulang dan verifikasi dua faktor. Pada paruh pertama 2026, 6 dari 10 serangan web ditargetkan untuk memperoleh kunci akses ke infrastruktur internal. Satu komputer karyawan yang terinfeksi dapat membuka jaringan yang terlindungi. Pengalaman internasional (seperti penutupan Genesis Market pada 2023) menunjukkan bahwa operasi semacam ini hanya menggeser titik penjualan, bukan menghilangkan sumbernya—infeksi perangkat terus berlanjut. Permintaan akan data "segar" juga mendorong operator botnet untuk mempertahankan mesin yang terinfeksi sebagai sumber pendapatan berkelanjutan. Tantangan bagi regulator adalah mengembangkan alat untuk lapisan antara perangkat pribadi dan perimeter korporat, yang saat ini berada di luar kendali regulasi yang ada.

cryptonews.ru39m yang lalu

Akses ke Sesi Aktif Alih-alih Basis Data: Bagaimana Pasar Gelap di Rusia Berubah

cryptonews.ru39m yang lalu

SlowMist Tandai Repositori Palsu Qwen 3.8 27B di GitHub yang Menyembunyikan Informasi StealC

SlowMist menandai repositori palsu Qwen 3.8 27B di GitHub yang menyembunyikan informasi tentang StealC. Repositori GitHub berbahaya ini mengunggah virus pencuri data yang menyamar sebagai file berat model AI Qwen 3.8 27B milik Alibaba. Repositori palsu tersebut menawarkan file ZIP berukuran hanya 487 KB, jauh lebih kecil dari model asli yang membutuhkan lebih dari 16 GB. File berbahaya bernama `uncensored_qwen_v2.6.zip` berisi skrip yang menyuntikkan malware StealC. Setelah dijalankan, StealC mengumpulkan informasi sistem, nama pengguna, tangkapan layar, serta mencuri data login browser, cookie, sejarah, kata sandi email, dan informasi dompet kripto. Malware ini bahkan memiliki sistem cadangan yang membaca alamat server dari blockchain Polygon. SlowMist menemukan setidaknya 23 repositori GitHub serupa dan 29 file ZIP yang menggunakan metode pengiriman berbasis Lua yang sama. Kampanye yang disebut FakeGit, aktif sejak Maret 2025, telah membuat sekitar 7.600 repositori berbahaya dan menghasilkan lebih dari 14 juta acara unduhan. Sekitar 800 repositori dirancang khusus untuk meniru alat-alat terkait AI. Serangan otomatis lain seperti Megalodon dapat membuat lebih dari 5.000 repositori palsu dalam enam jam. Peretas menyalin proyek nyata, membuat halaman README yang meyakinkan, dan mendaftarkan proyek palsu ke dalam registri AI publik untuk meningkatkan kredibilitasnya. Pengguna yang menjalankan model AI sumber terbuka secara lokal disarankan untuk sangat berhati-hati dan memverifikasi keaslian repositori serta ukuran file sebelum mengunduh.

cryptonews.ru41m yang lalu

SlowMist Tandai Repositori Palsu Qwen 3.8 27B di GitHub yang Menyembunyikan Informasi StealC

cryptonews.ru41m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片