JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon and Sen. Elizabeth Warren Team Up to Bash Crypto

CoinDeskPolicyDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-12-05Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-12-06

Abstrak

The CEO of the powerful Wall Street bank would prefer canceling crypto, though JPMorgan is using intrinsically related blockchain technology to move billions.

  • Even as Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan Chase has taken a prominent role among traditional financial firms in using blockchain, the CEO still says he loathes crypto.
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren built on the remarks from Dimon – usually an adversary – to call for more controls on industry transactions.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has never been shy about trashing crypto, even while his giant Wall Street bank became a leader in using blockchain technology to move billions. At a U.S. Senate hearing Wednesday, he slammed the industry again, to the delight of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who is trying to impose restrictions to combat illicit digital transactions.

7.7K

"I've always been deeply opposed to bitcoin, crypto, etc.," he told senators in a hearing examining the U.S. banking industry. "If I was the government, I'd close it down," he declared.

Lined up with other big-bank CEOs before the Senate Banking Committee, Dimon argued that the crypto industry gets to "move money instantaneously" without going through the regulatory conduits required by bankers, including sanctions and money-laundering controls. He contended that the primary use case for digital assets is criminality.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sen. Warren jumped in to get Dimon – a longtime adversary of the progressive Wall Street critic – and other CEOs to agree with her that crypto businesses should have to follow the same anti-money-laundering rules under the Bank Secrecy Act that other regulated financial firms do. That's the main thrust of legislation she's been pushing, which industry lobbyists have countered would rope in crypto projects that have no ability to comply, effectively killing them off.

The bill has some overlap in other crypto legislative efforts, but an aggressive effort to impose such restrictions probably won't find sufficient backing in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, so it isn't likely to move toward law in the near term.

Meanwhile, Dimon's bank – which has over $3 trillion of assets, more than double the market cap of all crypto assets combined – is a major player in Wall Street's race to move their businesses onto crypto-powered infrastructure. The company just said its JPM Coin is conveying $1 billion per day, and JPMorgan's Onyx division is exploring how to meld traditional finance with blockchains.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dimon has long differentiated between "crypto" and "blockchain," the ledger technology that serves as the foundation for cryptocurrencies and something Dimon argues is a useful tool.

Edited by Nick Baker.

Bacaan Terkait

Persaingan Kendali Rel Masuki Babak Kedua: Bank VS Kripto, Siapa yang Akan Menang?

Tiga bulan setelah artikel awal yang membahas masuknya bank ke blockchain melalui jaringan terkelola, perkembangan terkini menunjukkan persaingan semakin memanas. Empat peristiwa pada akhir Agustus 2026 mengonfirmasi pergeseran ini: 39 asosiasi perbankan AS membentuk "BankChain Alliance" untuk membangun jaringan blockchain nasional yang dikelola industri perbankan sendiri; infrastruktur pasar seperti DTCC, ICE, dan Citadel Securities semakin aktif menjelajahi aplikasi on-chain; penyedia kustodi kripto seperti ZeroHash berusaha keras mendapatkan lisensi bank perwalian OCC, sementara valuasi bisnis kustodi seperti Copper merosot tajam; serta stablecoin USD1, yang diterbitkan oleh BitGo Bank & Trust, diluncurkan secara native di jaringan Canton yang berfokus pada privasi institusi. Intinya, kompetisi tokenisasi telah bergeser dari "aset mana yang akan di-tokenisasi" menjadi "siapa yang mengendalikan infrastruktur atau 'jalur' inti" – yaitu lapisan penyelesaian, kustodi, dan lisensi. Lapisan-lapisan kunci ini semakin diakuisisi oleh lembaga keuangan tradisional seperti bank, pusat kliring, dan perusahaan market maker. Ini bukanlah akhir bagi dunia kripto, melainkan pembagian peran yang semakin jelas: blockchain publik tetap untuk DeFi dan inovasi terbuka, sementara jaringan konsorsium bank akan menangani transaksi kelembagaan, penyelesaian, dan aset sensitif yang memerlukan kepatuhan regulasi ketat. Nilai bisnis kustodi kini lebih ditentukan oleh "lisensi" daripada keunggulan teknologi semata. Demikian pula, hak penerbitan stablecoin semakin terkonsentrasi pada bank perwalian berlisensi, menekankan pentingnya struktur kepercayaan dan kepatuhan dalam membangun siklus keuangan tokenisasi yang kokoh. Kedaulatan atas definisi dan kendali "jalur" infrastruktur ini menjadi penentu utama dalam babak selanjutnya.

marsbit7m yang lalu

Persaingan Kendali Rel Masuki Babak Kedua: Bank VS Kripto, Siapa yang Akan Menang?

marsbit7m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片