Failure of Multi-Function Crypto Firms a Limited Threat to 'Real Economy': FSB

CoinDeskPolicyDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-11-27Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-11-28

Abstrak

A new report by the Financial Stability Board said further assessments of possible implications are required because "significant information gaps remain."

The collapse of crypto firms that engage in multiple activities isn't a big threat to "the real economy," according to a report by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) published Tuesday.

The report by the international standard-setter also said that further assessments are required because "significant information gaps remain."

The FSB, which monitors financial systems and proposes rules to help prevent financial crises, said it was assessing the financial stability implications of multifunction crypto-asset intermediaries (MCIs) in July. MCIs are individual firms or groups of affiliated firms that combine a broad range of services, products and functions typically centered around the operation of a trading platform, according to the FSB. This could apply to numerous crypto heavyweights, like Coinbase or Binance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The FSB warns that crypto firms combining different activities are more vulnerable to failure and that mitigating the impact of such a failure depends on how well global crypto regulation is implemented. The report also identified "information gaps" that require enhanced cross-border cooperation and information sharing.

The report found that the vulnerabilities of MCIs and firms in traditional finance are not very different. However, vulnerabilities increase when MCIs engage in proprietary trading, market-making on their own trading venues, and lending and borrowing.

The FSB said there is a need to assess whether disclosures and reporting requirements of MCIs are adequately covered or would warrant additional measures.

"Combining functions in MCIs that are typically restricted or separated for traditional finance appears prima facie inconsistent with the principle of ‘same activity, same risk, same regulation’," the report said.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

Bacaan Terkait

a16z tentang Perekrutan: Bagaimana Memilih antara Bakat Asli Kripto dan Bakat Tradisional?

Dengan berkembangnya industri crypto, timbul pertanyaan kritis: kapan harus merekrut talenta yang sudah berpengalaman di bidang crypto (crypto-native) dan kapan bakat dari latar belakang tradisional dapat menjadi aset? Menurut a16z, crypto-native profesional unggul dalam peran yang membutuhkan keahlian teknis mendalam dan spesifik, seperti pengembangan smart contract, di mana kesalahan dapat berakibat fatal. Namun, talenta tradisional dari perusahaan teknologi besar membawa keahlian dalam penskalaan, operasi yang kompleks, dan pengalaman membangun produk untuk jutaan pengguna, yang sangat berharga saat produk crypto beralih ke pasar arus utama. Kunci perekrutan adalah menemukan kandidat yang memiliki rasa ingin tahu alami tentang teknologi terdesentralisasi dan yang selaras dengan visi perusahaan. Proses wawancara harus disesuaikan untuk menguji motivasi dan pemahaman mereka, serta kemampuan untuk belajar dengan cepat. Struktur kompensasi, termasuk paket berbasis token, dapat menjadi daya tarik finansial yang signifikan. Setelah perekrutan, proses onboarding yang kuat sangat penting untuk mempercepat kurva pembelajaran melalui sesi berbagi pengetahuan, program mentoring, dan sumber daya pendidikan berkelanjutan. Intinya, membangun tim yang sukses di crypto membutuhkan kombinasi strategis antara keahlian crypto-native dan pengalaman tradisional, dengan fokus pada bakat yang dapat beradaptasi dan berkembang.

marsbit49m yang lalu

a16z tentang Perekrutan: Bagaimana Memilih antara Bakat Asli Kripto dan Bakat Tradisional?

marsbit49m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片