UK's Proposed Crypto Rules Could Drive Away Foreign Firms, Lawyers Say

CoinDeskPolicyDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-11-15Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-11-16

Abstrak

The government has said it won't extend certain regulatory exemptions reserved for foreign TradFi firms to crypto, potentially making it tougher for companies to enter the mar...

  • Crypto industry stakeholders have asked the U.K. government to consider extending regulatory exceptions for foreign TradFi firms to crypto.
  • The U.K. government has said it doesn’t plan to do so.
  • The tough requirements on foreign crypto firms could drive business away from the aspiring digital asset hub, lawyers told CoinDesk.
14.3K

The U.K. government plans to apply its upcoming crypto rules to all firms, without exception, a decision lawyers say could drive international companies out of the market.

Industry stakeholders have called for the government – which has said it wants to turn the U.K. into a global hub for crypto – to grant some regulatory exceptions for foreign crypto firms looking to operate in the country. In particular, they want it to expand the scope of overseas persons exclusions (OPE) to include crypto.

The OPE allows some traditional financial institutions (like multilateral trading facilities that exchange financial instruments) to operate without authorization. For example, the OPE can be used when the regulated activity is done “with or through” an authorized or exempt person.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The industry requests were made during a government consultation on crypto regulation, and in its response, the government made it clear that it was not planning to extend the OPE to crypto.

Choosing not to make those exceptions, however, could stifle international firms’ willingness to operate in the U.K., said Albert Weatherill, a partner at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright during an interview with CoinDesk.

"The removal of the OPE, I think, is a bit of a blow – in my opinion – for the industry," Weatherill said.

Harsher rules for crypto

The government doesn’t want to extend the OPE to crypto because "the context of crypto asset markets is not the same as those for traditional financial products to which the OPE already applies," it said in its consultation response.

The government's position is that firms that deal with U.K. retail consumers should be required to be authorized regardless of where they are located.

"It often isn’t possible to use the OPE if you provide services to retail clients," Hannah Meakin, also a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright told CoinDesk in a statement.

However, "what the government is actually doing is blocking use of the OPE for crypto to any overseas person, even if they’re only doing institutional business," Meakin said. "Perhaps the government thinks there is a different solution, such as deference or equivalence, but we are still waiting to see any details on this."

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

CoinDesk also reached out to the U.K. Treasury for more clarity but did not hear back before press time.

"They could have just narrowed the overseas persons exclusions more to say it's only available for wholesale transactions but they haven't," said Diego Ballon Ossio, partner at law firm Clifford Chance. "So I think that's a missed opportunity."

U.K. regulators plan on supervising crypto in phases, starting with stablecoin legislation coming early next year with policies for the wider crypto sector coming later. It has already passed legislation that treats crypto as a regulated activity under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.

The government wants international crypto trading firms to have to set up a U.K. branch if they want to get authorized to operate in the country, but companies may simply decide it’s "not worth the hassle," Weatherill said.

"If you are an exchange that's very active in Asia your client base is not normally here, but you've got lots of liquidity, why would you want to get a branch here if you have to go through the pain of setting up the brands, hiring people, etc..?" Ballon Ossio said.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Edited by Sandali Handagama.


Bacaan Terkait

Mengapa Asuransi DeFi Tidak Laku?

"DeFi Asuransi: Mengapa Tidak Ada yang Membelinya?" Asuransi DeFi dirancang untuk menghilangkan perantara dengan pembayaran klaim otomatis melalui kontrak pintar. Namun, pada kenyataannya, hampir tidak ada yang membelinya. Alasan utamanya adalah biaya premi yang terlalu tinggi. Premi asuransi bisa mencapai 1.5%–6%, yang secara signifikan menggerus keuntungan tahunan dari platform seperti Aave atau Compound (biasanya 3%-4%). Akibatnya, laba bersih pengguna menjadi sangat rendah, bahkan bisa negatif. Risiko di DeFi juga sangat terkait. Satu insiden keamanan (seperti peretasan protokol atau kegagalan oracle) dapat mempengaruhi banyak platform sekaligus. Kolam asuransi DeFi saat ini, dengan total aset hanya sekitar puluhan juta dolar, tidak cukup untuk menanggung kerugian besar seperti peretasan miliaran dolar. Selain itu, model keputusan klaim seperti di Nexus Mutual, di mana pemegang token memutuskan klaim, dapat menciptakan bias untuk menolak pembayaran. Kapasitas asuransi seluruh industri sangat kecil dibandingkan dengan total aset terkunci di DeFi yang mencapai ratusan miliar dolar. Solusi yang muncul berfokus pada pencegahan (seperti program bug bounty) dan mencoba menarik modal reasuransi tradisional, mengakui bahwa dana di dalam ekosistem saja tidak cukup. Intinya, asuransi DeFi saat ini menghadapi paradoks: semua orang butuh perlindungan, tetapi biayanya membuatnya tidak menarik, dan tidak ada yang bisa memaksa pengguna untuk membelinya, sehingga meninggalkan pasar rentan terhadap risiko sistemik.

marsbit2j yang lalu

Mengapa Asuransi DeFi Tidak Laku?

marsbit2j yang lalu

Dompet Cardano Dihantam Eksploitasi SecondFi Akibat Cacat Kunci Pribadi Picu Peringatan Keamanan

SecondFi, sebelumnya terkait dengan merek dompet Yoroi, menangguhkan layanannya setelah cacat kritis dalam perangkat lunak pembuatan dompet berbasis web mereka melaporkan mengekspos kunci privat dan mengakibatkan pencurian ADA besar. Insiden ini memicu peringatan mendesak bagi pengguna yang terdampak, namun sumber yang divalidasi menegaskan satu poin penting: ini bukanlah peretasan terhadap protokol blockchain Cardano itu sendiri. Kerentanan terletak pada proses pembuatan kunci privat di perangkat lunak dompet web SecondFi. Perkiraan awal menyebutkan 16 juta ADA dicuri dari 374 dompet, bernilai sekitar $2,4 juta. Firma keamanan SlowMist memperingatkan dampak totalnya bisa melebihi 129 juta ADA (lebih dari $20 juta). Jaringan Cardano sendiri tidak diretas; masalahnya terlokalisir pada perangkat lunak SecondFi. Peringatan keselamatan terkuat bagi pengguna yang terdampak adalah untuk TIDAK memulihkan frase seed yang telah dikompromikan ke dalam dompet lain, karena kunci privatnya sendiri mungkin telah bocor. Pengguna juga diperingatkan terhadap tautan pemulihan tidak resmi atau platform pengembalian dana pihak ketiga yang sering muncul pasca-eksploitasi. Insiden ini menjadi pengingat bahwa keamanan blockchain tidak berakhir di lapisan protokol. Proses pembuatan dompet, antarmuka berbasis browser, dan penanganan frase seed bisa menjadi titik kegagalan kritis. Fokus saat ini adalah membantu pengguna terdampak menghindari eksposur lebih lanjut sementara cakupan akhir insiden dikonfirmasi.

bitcoinist2j yang lalu

Dompet Cardano Dihantam Eksploitasi SecondFi Akibat Cacat Kunci Pribadi Picu Peringatan Keamanan

bitcoinist2j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片