True Decentralization Can be Achieved With Oracles

newsbtcDipublikasikan tanggal 2022-04-03Terakhir diperbarui pada 2022-04-03

Abstrak

The term ‘oracle’ has become quite commonly used within crypto circles across the globe in recent years, and rightly so....

The term ‘oracle’ has become quite commonly used within crypto circles across the globe in recent years, and rightly so. This is because these novel offerings are designed to connect various blockchain projects with a wide array of off-chain data, thus allowing for the advent of many novel use cases.
That said, most traditional oracles are faced with two core issues. Firstly, they require a centralized entity/intermediary to facilitate their access to external, real-time data — as a result of which third parties can potentially alter the data being supplied to it. Secondly, centralized oracles often have to forego many of the privacy advantages put forth by smart contracts, thereby posing major risks to the system’s overall security.
A smart contract can be thought of as a program/transaction protocol designed to automatically execute, administer and note relevant events and actions as per the terms of a predefined digital agreement.
Decentralized oracles explained
As highlighted earlier, centralized oracles serve as single, stand-alone entities that provide data from an external source to a smart contract operating within a set governance framework. As a result, they, more often than not, feature a single point of failure that can result in them being corrupted or being attacked.
On the other hand, decentralized oracles can be visualized as a group of independent oracles where each node operating within the network is capable of acting on its own accord — i.e., having the ability to work solo and retrieve data from an off-chain source.
Since they don’t have any sort of dependence on a “single source of truth”, the overall authenticity, and veracity of the data being supplied to the associated smart contract can be verified with an extremely high degree of efficacy.
To elaborate, most high-quality Decentralized Oracle Networks (DONs) provide their clients with highly specific security features such as data integrity proofs (that use cryptographic signatures); data validation modules using multi-layer aggregation (so as to eliminate downtime-related issues); crypto-economic guarantees as well as other optional features such as zero-knowledge proofs.
From an operational standpoint, decentralized oracles are ideal for use within a complex business environment but need a high level of financial investment — especially when it comes to setting up the project’s native infrastructure as well as paying for its general upkeep/maintenance.
The issues with oracles in their present form
While the transparency and decentralization aspect of most oracle-based platforms is quite intriguing, at least on paper, it should be noted that such propositions are only valid insofar that the information being supplied to a particular blockchain is “tamper-proof”. Now that being said, it is worth looking into the question of who really has the power to authenticate this data?
In fact, this question has been looked at in-depth by many blockchain experts and arises whenever a digital asset has to be linked to its physical counterpart.
As an example, whenever the transfer of ownership relating to a physical commodity (for example a necklace) has to take place between two people, the smart contract associated with the deal has to be supplied with data ensuring the validity of the supplied information.
To achieve this, a third party is usually required for the verification of events taking place in the real world. And while many projects have sought to alleviate this pain point in recent years, the issue is still quite prevalent today.
Decentralized Oracle solutions
Chainlink
One of the most popular oracle networks in the market today, Chainlink is best described as a decentralized network of nodes capable of delivering its users a wide range of real-time info from external data sources. The platform’s native smart contract architecture is automated and is able to perform actions as and when certain predefined conditions are satisfied.
Chainlink’s network is designed to help process real-world data associated with a number of feeds ranging from asset prices to sports data to shipping data to weather data. As a result of its multifaceted utilitarian structure, the platform is currently being used by a number of prominent DeFi projects such as Aave, Kyber Network, Synthetix, amongst others.
QED
QED can be thought of as a future-ready decentralized oracle designed to connect a wide number of blockchain networks and their associated smart contracts with external data sources seamlessly. Operationally speaking, QED Oracles utilize ‘external collateral’ as a bond to their smart contract theory mitigating many systemic risks that may have otherwise entered the fray.
Furthermore, the platform uses a ‘reliability scoring’ mechanism that determines the oracle’s capital efficiency while weeding out any poor performers from within the ecosystem. Lastly, QED has been built atop a blockchain that features no single point of failure and does not make use of a centralized verification system — allowing for a higher level of operational efficacy and overall security.
Witnet
Simply put, Witnet is a decentralized oracle network (DON) that not only connects smart contracts to real-world data sources but also allows third-party software to gather certain, specific info published by a given web address at any given point in time in its lifecycle, that too with verifiable proof.
It is worth mentioning that Witnet comes with a highly developed, holistic blockchain as well as a native digital asset that miners have the option of securing in lieu of retrieving, attesting and delivering web content.

Bacaan Terkait

Probabilitas dalam Harga: Bagaimana Odds Piala Dunia Dihitung

**Ringkasan: Probabilitas dalam Harga – Bagaimana Peluang Piala Dunia Dihitung** Sebelum Piala Dunia 2026, dua sistem otoritatif memberikan "probabilitas juara" yang berbeda. Pasar prediksi (seperti Polymarket, Kalshi) menempatkan Prancis sebagai favorit utama, sekitar **17%**. Sementara model superkomputer Opta menempatkan Spanyol (juara Euro) sebagai favorit, **16.1%**. Angka-angka ini terlihat seperti "probabilitas", tetapi diproduksi dengan cara yang sangat berbeda. **Probabilitas pasar** berasal dari harga yang terbentuk dari perdagangan miliaran dolar. Harga kontrak (dalam sen) dibaca langsung sebagai probabilitas tersirat. Namun, penelitian menunjukkan adanya bias **longshot bias**, di mana underdog cenderung dilebih-lebihkan, bahkan di pasar prediksi kripto yang modern. Likuiditas yang masih terbatas juga memengaruhi keandalan harga. Di sisi lain, **probabilitas model** seperti dari Opta dihasilkan dengan mensimulasikan seluruh turnamen ribuan kali berdasarkan data tim dan peringkat. Menariknya, model ini juga memasukkan informasi dari peluang pasar taruhan tradisional sebagai salah satu inputnya. Pertanyaan mana yang lebih akurat tidak dapat dijawab dengan pasti, karena tidak ada studi akademis ketat yang membandingkan keduanya secara langsung di Piala Dunia sebelumnya. Transparansi pasar prediksi berbasis blockchain memungkinkan audit publik, namun ketidakpastian regulasi di berbagai yurisdiksi (seperti larangan di Minnesota, AS) juga menjadi faktor yang memengaruhi. Kesimpulannya, ketika melihat angka "probabilitas juara", penting untuk menanyakan: **Bagaimana angka ini diproduksi?** Apakah itu harga pasar dengan bias dan dinamika likuiditasnya, atau hasil simulasi model yang mungkin telah menyerap informasi pasar? Akurasi sejati akan terlihat setelah turnamen berakhir.

marsbit27m yang lalu

Probabilitas dalam Harga: Bagaimana Odds Piala Dunia Dihitung

marsbit27m yang lalu

Terbaru! Anthropic Serukan Semua Pihak untuk Hentikan Penelitian AI

**Ringkasan Artikel: Anthropic Serukan Penghentian Penelitian AI** Anthropic baru saja mempublikasikan temuan mengejutkan melalui blog resmi mereka: AI telah memulai proses evolusi mandiri, atau *recursive self-improvement* (RSI). Data internal menunjukkan bahwa model mereka, Claude, kini menulis lebih dari 80% kode yang digunakan di internal Anthropic—lonjakan drastis dari sebelumnya yang hanya berupa angka tunggal. Produktivitas insinyur melonjak delapan kali lipat per kuartal pada 2026 dibandingkan periode 2021-2025, didorong oleh kemampuan coding Claude. Yang lebih mengkhawatirkan adalah peningkatan kualitas dan kreativitasnya. Dalam tugas pemrograman yang kompleks dan terbuka, tingkat keberhasilan Claude naik dari 26% menjadi 76% hanya dalam enam bulan. Claude bahkan kini digunakan untuk mereview kode, berhasil mencegah sepertiga bug yang sebelumnya lolos dari insinyur manusia. Anthropic memperkenalkan metrik baru: "durasi tugas perangkat lunak yang dapat diselesaikan AI secara mandiri." Kemampuan ini berlipat ganda setiap empat bulan. Jika tren berlanjut, pada 2027 AI dapat mengerjakan proyek yang memakan waktu manusia berminggu-minggu. Peran manusia dalam pengembangan AI semakin menyempit, dari penulis kode, reviewer, hingga pelaksana eksperimen. Keunggulan terakhir manusia saat ini mungkin hanya "selera penelitian," namun ini bisa saja segera tersaingi. Anthropic menggarisbawahi tiga kemungkinan masa depan RSI: stagnasi, akselerasi dengan kendali manusia, atau AI yang sepenuhnya mendesain generasi penerusnya sendiri—sebuah skenario yang membawa manfaat besar sekaligus risiko kegagalan *alignment* dan kehilangan kendali. Oleh karena itu, Anthropic secara terbuka menyerukan perlambatan atau bahkan jeda dalam perlombaan pengembangan AI, **asalkan ada mekanisme terverifikasi yang dapat memastikan semua laboratorium AI mematuhinya**. Seruan ini mendapat gema dari OpenAI yang juga mengaku melihat tanda-tanda awal RSI dalam sistem mereka.

marsbit28m yang lalu

Terbaru! Anthropic Serukan Semua Pihak untuk Hentikan Penelitian AI

marsbit28m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli LINK

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian ChainLink (LINK) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli ChainLink (LINK) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan ChainLink (LINK) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan ChainLink (LINK) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading ChainLink (LINK)Lakukan trading ChainLink (LINK) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

963 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2024.12.13Diperbarui pada 2026.06.02

Cara Membeli LINK

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga LINK (LINK) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片