[Featured Research]CEX May Continue To Dominate?

CoinGeckoDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-01-29Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-01-29

Abstrak

In-depth research on 8 highlights from CoinGecko's 2022 Crypto Industry Report.

2022 has proven to be a tumultuous year for projects and users alike in the crypto space. Crypto winter has set in, and the total crypto market cap currently sits at $829 billion as of January 1, 2023 — 64% lower than a year ago. While DeFi token prices and the demand for NFTs remain suppressed, builders have continued to develop new and innovative protocols, giving rise to new trends and narratives throughout the past year.

Our comprehensive 2022 Annual Crypto Industry Report covers everything from the crypto market landscape to analyzing Bitcoin and Ethereum, deep diving into the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Non-Fungible Token (NFT) ecosystem and reviewing the Centralized Exchanges (CEX) and Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) performance.

The key highlights have been summarized below, but be sure to dig into the full 49 slides below.

1. After a brutal Q2, the crypto market has been trading sideways, in the low $1 trillion range and below

Amid challenging macroeconomic conditions and a slew of exploits, bankruptcies and debacles in the crypto industry, the year rounded off with a total crypto market capitalization of $829 billion, which is 64.1% lower than the $2.3 trillion at the start of year.

Q2 2022 was the most brutal period with the largest drawdown. Subsequently, markets have been drifting sideways, up until FTX’s collapse in November 2022.

Average daily trading volume last quarter dropped 32.8% from $88.1 billion in Q3 to $59.2 billion in Q4. Overall, daily trading volumes have steadily trended downwards over the year, averaging at $86.0 billion in 2022.

Movements in the crypto market were very closely correlated with movements of the US equities market, particularly the S&P500 through out the first three quarters of 2022. However in Q4 this correlation flipped negative as crypto took a dip due to FTX, while equities saw a recovery at the end of the year.

2. Stablecoins shed $27.3 billion despite their increased dominance; meanwhile USDC and BUSD saw gains in market cap

Crypto investors turned towards safer assets last year, with the top three stablecoins Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC) and Binance USD (BUSD) increasing their dominance in the crypto market. Yet, the stablecoins market was not spared from outflows, shedding a total of $27.3 billion or 16.6% by year-end. Most of this loss was recorded during the TerraUSD (UST) collapse in May 2022. The sector has fared relatively well since, despite periodic FUD (‘fear, doubt, and uncertainty’) of another depegging event.

The largest stablecoin USDT saw a decline in market cap of 15.5% or $12.2 billion in absolute terms. Conversely, USDC and BUSD each saw similar growth of $2.3 billion (+5.5%) and $2.1 billion (+14.7%) respectively.

Top decentralized stablecoins Dai (DAI) (-43.4%) and Frax (FRAX) (-43.9%) took similar percentage losses, although DAI’s $4 billion loss was almost 5 times larger in absolute terms.

Outside of the top 5, Neutrino USD (USDN) fell out of the top 15 after depegging in November, with MAI (MIMATIC) taking its place. USDD (USDD), a stablecoin launched in May, now sits at rank #8, and saw its market cap hovering around $700 billion since mid-year.

3. The FTX contagion impacted over 1 million estimated depositors, creditors and investors; more dominoes likely to fall in the coming months

CoinDesk’s article alleged that the majority of Alameda’s assets were in FTT tokens issued by FTX. Shortly after, Binance CEO, Changpeng Zhao ‘CZ’ announced his intention to dump Binance’s FTT token stake. This triggered a bank run, which resulted in FTX halting withdrawals, and subsequently filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It has since been revealed that Alameda was insolvent post-Terra / Luna crash, and user funds from FTX were used to prop up the failed trading firm.

To name a few, some of the severely hit entities are:

Lending platform BlockFi had $355 million on FTX, and a further $671 million lent to Alameda.

Genesis Global Trading had $175 million worth of inaccessible deposits on FTX, and are currently unable to serve redemptions from its lending product.

$8 billion on Silvergate Bank was withdrawn by depositors in FTX’s collapse aftermath. The bank has since laid off 40% of its workforce.

While many companies and institutions have already fallen, it is likely that many more are expected to follow suit throughout 2023.

4. Major assets performed poorly across the board, except Crude Oil and the US Dollar; BTC was the worst performing asset with a 64.2% drop.

Majority of the assets, like Gold and TLT, closed the year in red. Of the assets, Bitcoin (BTC) was the worst performing in 2022, ending the year with a 64.2% decline.

Bitcoin vs Major Assets Price Returns Table 2022-CoinGecko Annual Crypto Report

Outperforming all assets is the US Dollar Index (DXY), attributed to the Federal Reserve raising interest rates through 2022. Yet, most of its gains were lost in Q4 as interest rate hikes slowed; the DXY dipped -7.4% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ), and saw only an 8.0% price return year-to-date.

Crude oil saw significant gains of up to 63.4% towards the end of Q1 due to surging demand—lifted COVID-19 lockdowns worldwide coincided with a massive supply shortage driven by the Russia-Ukraine War. However, similar to the DXY, it has returned most of its gains and ended the year only 6.4% higher.

5. Ether staking sees steady growth to 15.8 million by year-end, driven by Ethereum upgrades

Despite the crypto market slump, total staked ether (ETH) saw a steady QoQ growth, increasing 25% in Q1, 17.8% in Q2, 8.2% in Q3 and 12.5% in Q4 2022. Total staked ETH closed the year at 15.8 million units, up from 8.8 million.

In the first half of 2022, growth of total staked ETH in validators can be attributed to a bullish Ethereum Merge sentiment. Following a successful Merge in mid-September, the crypto community began to anticipate the upcoming Shanghai upgrade – driving its notable growth last quarter.

Lido (LDO) continues to dominate, holding 29.4% of all staked ETH across its 29 node operators. Its closest competitor, Coinbase only held 12.8% of the market.

Ethereum’s Shanghai upgrade is expected to be implemented sometime in March 2023, and will allow stakers to withdraw their ETH – and may give rise to a reorganization of the staking leaderboard.

6. DeFi tokens market cap plummeted 72.9% and saw derivatives surpass yield aggregators in market share

Compared to 2021, the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) market cap shrank by 72.9%, with various governance and utility tokens losing over $48.4 billion in value. The liquid staking category saw the smallest decrease of 25.9% YoY, likely due to the Ethereum Merge narrative that played out in Q3 2022.

DeFi protocols took a greater hit compared to the rest of the market, because of previously inflated valuations and capital withdrawals. Lending protocols and yield aggregators were the worst-performing sectors of the year, seeing declines as much as 80.5% and 85.3% respectively. Protocols such as Convex Finance (CVX) and Alchemix (ALCX) suffered price drops of up to 95.0%.

Despite a 65.0% decrease YoY, derivatives have maintained their market share at 7.9%, allowing them to surpass yield aggregators – attributed to a surge in popularity of decentralized perpetuals platforms like GMX (GMX) and Gains Network (GNS).

7. Amid first NFT winter, OpenSea’s market share slid to 65.4%, but still dominates

The NFT market is on its first bearish cycle – NFT trading volumes across the top 8 chains have plunged by 93.1% from $13.3 billion in Q1 to $1.5 billion in Q4 2022. In parallel, NFT creator royalties have similarly decreased by 95%, since the start of the year.

Amid NFT winter, OpenSea* still dominates with 65.4% market share of NFT trading volume, excluding wash trades. While their dominance has decreased by 24.3 percentage points since January 2022, the rise of Solana NFTs have propelled Magic Eden’s share of trading volume upwards to 12.5%, by the end of 2022.

Regardless, OpenSea has defended its position against new NFT marketplace contenders LooksRare (LOOKS) and X2Y2 (X2Y2), which incentivised users to trade and list popular collections on their platform. Instead, users turned to wash trading to earn these rewards. On LooksRare, 98.5% of total NFT trading volume were wash trades in January 2022. It has since reduced to 75.5% in December 2022, due to lower reward emissions.

*OpenSea trading volumes include Ethereum, Polygon and Solana

8. Spot trading volume shrank 67.3% from January 2022, with its largest QoQ decline of 21.2% in Q4 2022

Spot trading volume across the top 10 crypto exchanges totalled $1.5 trillion in January, but sank 67.3% to all-year low levels of $0.46 trillion in December, in the aftermath of FTX’s collapse. The largest QoQ decline occurred in the last quarter, where total spot trading volume decreased by 21.2% from $2.9 trillion in Q3 to $2.3 trillion in Q4 2022.

Despite the open display of centralized risks, the CEX:DEX ratio remained consistently high. While FUD regarding Binance’s insolvency gave DEXs a small boost in market share in November, as at the end of 2022, CEXs command 92.5% of the market.

Dwindling volumes are a sign that investors are withdrawing further from the market, or leaving it entirely through CEX off-ramps.

Bacaan Terkait

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

Sebuah koalisi yang terdiri dari pemimpin Katolik, kelompok yang sejalan dengan penegak hukum, dan advokat anti-penjualan manusia memperingatkan bahwa RUU CLARITY Act berpotensi melemahkan pengamanan yang digunakan untuk memerangi kejahatan yang dimungkinkan oleh crypto. Kritik ini berfokus pada ketentuan yang akan melindungi pengembang perangkat lunak non-kustodial agar tidak diperlakukan seperti penyedia pengiriman uang. Perdebatan ini menyentuh salah satu pertanyaan tersulit dalam regulasi crypto: bagaimana membedakan perangkat lunak netral dari perantara keuangan. Para pendukung crypto berargumen bahwa pengembang yang menerbitkan kode non-kustodial tidak boleh diregulasi seperti bursa atau prosesor pembayaran. Sementara para pengkritik khawatir pengecualian yang terlalu luas dapat menyulitkan pelacakan keuangan ilegal. Perangkat lunak non-kustodial adalah inti dari DeFi. Arsitektur ini menciptakan tantangan penegakan hukum ketika aktor jahat menggunakan alat yang sama. Meski RUU CLARITY Act bertujuan menciptakan aturan struktur pasar yang lebih jelas, penentangan ini menunjukkan bahwa perdebatan kebijakan juga menyangkut isu seperti perdagangan manusia, pengelakan sanksi, dan visibilitas bagi penegak hukum. Tekanan ini tidak berarti RUU tersebut mati, tetapi mungkin membutuhkan amandemen, perlindungan yang lebih sempit, atau persyaratan pelaporan tambahan untuk mengatasi kekhawatiran tentang celah bagi keuangan ilegal. Bagi perusahaan crypto, aturan yang lebih jelas dapat membuka investasi, namun jika RUU ini dianggap melemahkan pencegahan kejahatan, jalur politisnya bisa menjadi lebih sulit.

bitcoinist9m yang lalu

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

bitcoinist9m yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

**Rangkuman: Tuduhan Penipuan dan Pertanyaan Seputar Blockstream** Tahun ini, Blockstream, perusahaan kripto yang didirikan oleh perintis Bitcoin Adam Back, menjadi sorotan. Awalnya, karena investasi Jeffrey Epstein pada 2014 dan spekulasi bahwa Back bisa jadi Satoshi Nakamoto. Namun, kontroversi utama muncul dari laporan investigasi oleh akun NatInfoSec yang menuduh skema obligasi penambangan Bitcoin Blockstream (BMN) berpotensi penipuan mirip Ponzi. **Titik Tuduhan Utama:** 1. **Kapasitas dan Pembayaran yang Dipertanyakan:** NatInfoSec menyatakan untuk memenuhi kewajiban BMN, Blockstream membutuhkan daya komputasi (hashrate) 20-45 EH/s, tetapi dashboard perusahaan hanya menunjukkan 15 EH/s. Tidak ada bukti publik yang memadai (data listrik, impor perangkat keras, atribusi pool penambangan) untuk mendukung skala yang diklaim. Klausul dalam kontrak BMN juga memungkinkan Blockstream membayar dengan Bitcoin dari sumber mana pun, mempertanyakan asal hasil yang dibayarkan kepada investor. 2. **Imbal Hasil Tinggi yang Mencurigakan:** Obligasi BMN menawarkan imbal hasil tetap hingga sekitar 20% per tahun, angka yang sulit dipertahankan di industri penambangan Bitcoin yang sangat fluktuatif. Beberapa penawaran juga diklaim melibatkan perpanjangan pokok ke obligasi baru dengan imbal lebih tinggi. 3. **Masalah Pengungkapan dan Masa Lalu Eksekutif:** Christopher William Cook, figur kunci di divisi penambangan Blockstream dan CEO Exacore (entitas operasional terkait), memiliki catatan kriminal. Ia dihukum pada 2008 karena penipuan surat (mail fraud) dan menjalani hukuman penjara. Informasi ini tidak diungkapkan dalam dokumen penawaran BMN. Materi pemasaran juga diduga membesar-besarkan keterkaitan Cook dengan NASA. 4. **Keterkaitan dengan BSTR dan SPAC:** NatInfoSec mempertanyakan apakah potensi liabilitas BMN dan latar belakang Cook telah diungkapkan dengan benar dalam proses persiapan IPO perusahaan terkait Bitcoin, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), yang melibatkan Adam Back. **Tanggapan dan Debat Komunitas:** BitMEX Research menganalisis tuduhan tersebut, mengakui kemungkinan catatan kriminal Cook dan kekhawatiran atas imbal hasil tinggi. Namun, mereka berpendapat bahwa beberapa tuduhan kurang bukti atau menyesatkan, menekankan pemisahan struktur hukum antara BMN, Blockstream, dan BSTR. Perdebatan di komunitas berfokus pada **kemampuan untuk memverifikasi** hashrate dan hasil penambangan yang sebenarnya yang mendasari BMN. Para pendukung seperti Samson Mow membela operasi penambangan Blockstream, sementara para pengkritik meminta bukti verifikasi independen yang jelas. **Pertanyaan yang Belum Terjawab untuk BMN:** Kontroversi ini menyisakan beberapa pertanyaan kunci tentang BMN: skala sebenarnya dan batas tanggung jawab, kecukupan hashrate penambangan untuk mendukung pembayaran, sumber imbal hasil tetap yang tinggi, kemampuan memverifikasi aset Bitcoin yang digunakan untuk pembayaran, serta peran dan kepentingan Cook. Sampai saat ini, Blockstream belum memberikan tanggapan resmi yang menyeluruh terhadap berbagai tuduhan ini.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

marsbit3j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

**Ringkasan Artikel: Komunitas Reddit r/wallstreetbets Menargetkan Wendy's (WEN), Apakah Ini GME Berikutnya?** Pada 24 Juni, saham Wendy's (WEN) melonjak setelah sebuah postingan berjudul "We need to save Wendy's" viral di subreddit r/wallstreetbets (WSB), memicu spekulasi bahwa ini bisa menjadi "meme stock" atau sasaran "short squeeze" berikutnya, mirip dengan fenomena GameStop (GME) pada 2021. Postingan tersebut, yang menggunakan guyonan lama di komunitas WSB tentang bekerja di Wendy's setelah investasi gagal, berhasil menarik perhatian dan mendorong diskusi untuk membeli saham atau opsi beli (call options). Saham WEN naik lebih dari 20% dalam perdagangan pra-pasar, dengan volume perdagangan yang sangat tinggi. Artikel ini menganalisis apakah WEN memiliki potensi untuk menjadi "squeeze" sistematis seperti GME. Beberapa faktor pendukung yang teridentifikasi adalah: * **Rasio Short Interest yang Cukup Tinggi:** Sekitar 31.83% saham beredar dipinjam untuk dijual (short), yang dapat menjadi bahan bakar jika harga naik dan para pedagang short terpaksa membeli kembali saham. * **Perhatian Komunitas yang Kuat:** Wendy's memiliki identitas merek yang mudah dikenali dan cocok dengan budaya meme di WSB. Namun, analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi WEN **tidak sama ekstremnya dengan GME tahun 2021**: * **Struktur Short yang Tidak Seekstrem GME:** Rasio short interest WEN (31.83%) jauh di bawah level GME yang pernah melebihi 100%, sehingga tekanan untuk menutup posisi short tidak separah saat itu. * **Bukti untuk "Gamma Squeeze" Masih Lemah:** Meski ada diskusi tentang opsi beli, belum ada bukti kuat bahwa pembelian opsi tersebut sudah cukup masif untuk memaksa market maker (penjual opsi) membeli saham dalam jumlah besar sebagai lindung nilai, yang dapat memicu akselerasi harga berkelanjutan. * **Sejarah sebagai Meme Stock:** WEN pernah mengalami lonjakan serupa pada 2021 yang akhirnya mereda, menunjukkan bahwa antusiasme komunitas tidak selalu diterjemahkan menjadi kenaikan harga yang berkelanjutan. * **Narasi Dasar yang Terbatas:** Kampanye "selamatkan Wendy's" lebih merupakan lelucon komunitas daripada didasarkan pada kesulitan finansial perusahaan yang nyata. **Kesimpulan:** Pergerakan harga WEN menunjukkan bahwa perhatian dari komunitas retail seperti WSB masih dapat dengan cepat menggerakkan harga saham. Namun, bukti saat ini lebih mengarah pada **"meme pop" jangka pendek atau "squeeze" ringan**, bukan tekanan short sistematis skala penuh seperti GME. Keberlanjutan rally akan bergantung pada apakah diskusi berkembang di luar satu postingan panas, volume perdagangan tinggi bertahan selama beberapa hari, dan aktivitas opsi beli meningkat secara signifikan untuk menciptakan putaran umpan balik yang memperkuat kenaikan harga.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

marsbit4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片