Self-Directed Insider Trading: How He Manipulated Prediction Markets to Pay for His Bugatti?

比推Publié le 2026-03-11Dernière mise à jour le 2026-03-11

Résumé

A prominent X user, @Euanker, has accused former kickboxing champion Andrew Tate of orchestrating an elaborate insider trading scheme on the prediction market platform Polymarket. The allegations claim that Tate controlled at least seven accounts to profit from markets predicting his own weekly tweet activity, earning a total of $52,286. On-chain evidence reveals a consistent funding path: deposits from exchanges like Duelbits and Bybit were bridged via a specific address, then used to place bets on Polymarket. Profits were ultimately funneled to a Gnosis Safe wallet controlled by Tate, which holds over $1.3 million in assets. The betting patterns closely aligned with Tate’s actual tweet activity, indicating manipulation. Andrew Tate, a controversial influencer known for his luxury lifestyle and previous involvement in meme coin promotions, is alleged to have used this scheme to fund expenses like his rented Bugatti. The incident highlights significant regulatory gaps in prediction markets, where outcomes controlled by a single individual create inherent insider risks. Polymarket, which approves all markets on its platform, faces scrutiny over its lack of safeguards against such manipulation.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

Original Title: Funding a Bugatti with Polymarket? Someone is Playing 'Self-Directed' Insider Trading


On March 10, X user @Euanker posted an exposé alleging that renowned combat sports champion Andrew Tate was involved in insider trading on Polymarket, profiting by manipulating markets related to the quantity of his personal tweets. Euanker pointed out that Tate created and controlled at least 7 Polymarket accounts, accumulating profits of $52,286 across six 'Weekly Tweet Count Prediction' markets. These markets essentially depend on Tate's own actions, with the exposé bluntly stating his aim was to 'raise funds for a rented Bugatti sports car.'

Interestingly, this exposé included detailed on-chain evidence and profit charts, allowing us a glimpse into the specifics of this insider trading.

Detailed Explanation of On-Chain Address Records: Identical Deposit Paths

The evidence provided by Euanker shows that the 7 Polymarket accounts (@Tornados, @eterboh5, @Mellisacars, @AntonFuar, @wondernot, @Lindayko, @Counteryeg) were highly consistent in their deposit exchanges, fund paths, and betting habits. The first 5 accounts have been fully linked through on-chain transactions, with the subsequent 2 also showing the same pattern.

The core tracking starts with the @Counteryeg account.


Its fund flow points to the bridging address 0xdae2844d5b3070aafb3638b80fa17e562d840dde. This address frequently conducted cross-chain transfers of USDC and USDC.e in the past week, primarily involving the Polygon and Ethereum networks. These funds were then transferred to the intermediary address 0x9D950Fb9D5F37a128bA0d4B82844DE96697fD83d.

Data from Arkham Intelligence for this address shows that in the past week, it received large USDC deposits from exchanges like Duelbits (a gambling platform), Changelly, and Bybit, accounting for 20%, 42%, and 26% respectively. Typical transactions include a 4000 USDC deposit from Duelbits, a 5700 USDC bridge withdrawal, and multiple transfers of 2500~6000 USDC to the upstream bridging address. The cumulative transaction volume of the address shows that the stablecoin flow rhythm highly coincides with Polymarket betting windows, presenting a unified pattern of 'large deposit first, precise betting second, profit aggregation after'.

The final fund chain points to a Gnosis Safe multi-signature address (confirmed by the exposé and transaction graph as belonging to Tate). Arkham records show this Safe holds over $1.3 million in assets, with recent large USDT/USDC withdrawal operations.

The entire chain forms a closed loop: exchange deposit → bridging address transfer → Polymarket betting → profit aggregation to Tate's controlled Gnosis Safe.

The fund flow chart attached by Euanker clearly marks the Polymarket icon and the Gnosis Safe endpoint. A profit chart of the 7 accounts further corroborates, showing a rapid climb from an initial loss of $5,203 on February 22 to a cumulative peak of $52,286 on March 10, with multiple instances synchronized with Tate's public tweet timings. This level of consistency far exceeds coincidence. The identical combination of exchanges, same USDC bridging scale, and operational patterns precisely matching market settlement times constitute the core on-chain basis for the exposé's insider trading allegations.

From Luxury Cars and Mansions to Meme Coins, Fans Become Tools for Monetizing Influence

Andrew Tate (full name Emory Andrew Tate III), born in 1986, is a public figure, businessman, and former professional fighter with dual US and UK citizenship. Tate began his professional kickboxing career in 2005, winning multiple championships in the late 2000s to early 2010s, including the ISKA British Full-Contact Cruiserweight Championship (2009) and the ISKA World Championship (2011), claiming to be a four-time world champion. He is about 1.91 meters tall, with the nicknames 'Cobra Tate' or 'Top G'.

Andrew Tate has long presented a luxurious lifestyle; his名下 (owned) or rented multiple Bugatti sports cars and numerous mansions have long been the core of his personal brand. The term 'rented Bugatti' in the exposé恰好吻合 (perfectly matches) Tate's publicly flaunted pattern of luxury consumption.

He has repeatedly showcased high-end assets on social platforms, using this to reinforce his 'alpha male' persona and attract young male fans globally. After retiring, he shifted to online business and content creation, launching paid course platforms (like Hustler's University and War Room), teaching topics like wealth building, entrepreneurship, and mindset training, primarily attracting young male audiences.

Starting in 2022, he and his brother Tristan were arrested in Romania, facing charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal organization (related to recruiting women using the 'loverboy' method to produce adult content); the case is still ongoing. After the Romanian travel ban was lifted in late 2025, the two returned to the US. Currently, he also faces a UK civil lawsuit (four women alleging sexual violence and coercion), which has been moved up to Summer 2026. He denies all criminal and civil charges, calling them a political witch hunt against him.

Upon entering the crypto space, Tate further monetized his influence. He has issued multiple meme coins, the most representative being the DADDY series directly tied to his personal IP, achieving rapid monetization through fan-driven hype. Bubblemaps exposed that he had promoted over 10 shitcoins within 24 hours; after Bubblemaps revealed the insider information about DADDY token supply, Andrew subsequently blocked Bubblemaps.

These operations form a complete闭环 (closed loop) with this Polymarket incident: first, gather traffic with controversial statements and lifestyle, then directly extract funds from fans' wallets through prediction markets or meme coins. Whether it's luxury cars and mansions or meme coin issuance, the essence is the same monetization logic—converting personal fame into quantifiable cash flow.

This exposé once again reminds the crypto industry that prediction markets and the meme coin ecosystem under celebrity influence still have significant governance gaps. This incident points directly to structural deficiencies in Polymarket's market creation review process. For example, markets like 'Andrew Tate's Weekly Tweet Count' are created without effective门槛 (thresholds) to verify whether the market has objectivity or is susceptible to manipulation risk. The core value of prediction markets lies in aggregating分散 (dispersed) information for price discovery, but when the subject is entirely controlled by a single entity, information asymmetry is放大至极端 (amplified to an extreme). Tate could simply adjust his tweet frequency to influence market outcomes, while retail investors bet based on public information, unaware of the internal manipulation.

Previously, the author wrote an article titled 'He Made $300,000 Counting Musk's Tweets'. The prediction market tracked Elon Musk's tweet count; Musk himself is the world's richest man, a hard tech entrepreneur with no motive to profit from insider trading, while Andrew Tate might not be. Polymarket currently does not allow any individual user to directly create prediction markets. All markets are ultimately created by Polymarket's market team. If Polymarket does not strengthen market审查 (review), similar allegations are likely to continue to发酵 (ferment).


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618832

Questions liées

QWhat is Andrew Tate accused of doing on Polymarket according to the article?

AAndrew Tate is accused of engaging in insider trading on Polymarket by manipulating prediction markets related to the number of his own tweets. He allegedly controlled at least 7 Polymarket accounts to profit from these markets, earning a total of $52,286.

QHow did the exposé by user @Euanker provide evidence of Tate's alleged manipulation?

A@Euanker provided detailed on-chain evidence and profit charts showing that the 7 Polymarket accounts had identical deposit paths, funding sources from exchanges like Duelbits and Bybit, and a unified pattern of fund flow that ultimately led to a Gnosis Safe wallet controlled by Tate.

QWhat is the significance of the 'weekly tweet count prediction' markets in this case?

AThe 'weekly tweet count prediction' markets were significant because they were based entirely on Andrew Tate's own behavior, allowing him to manipulate the outcome by controlling the number of tweets he posted, thus creating an unfair advantage and profiting from insider knowledge.

QHow does this incident highlight a potential issue with Polymarket's governance?

AThe incident exposes a structural weakness in Polymarket's market creation and review process, as markets dependent on a single individual's actions lack objectivity and are susceptible to manipulation, undermining the platform's core purpose of price discovery through dispersed information.

QWhat other methods has Andrew Tate used to monetize his influence, as mentioned in the article?

AAndrew Tate has monetized his influence through luxury lifestyle branding, paid online courses like Hustler's University, and by promoting and issuing meme coins such as the DADDY series, leveraging his fan base for financial gain.

Lectures associées

Arthur Hayes dans un nouvel article : La bulle de l'IA approche de son éclatement, le marché crypto sous pression à court terme

Arthur Hayes, cofondateur de BitMEX, analyse dans cet article les tensions géopolitiques actuelles et leurs implications sur les marchés financiers. Il estime que la hausse des prix du pétrole, liée au conflit entre les États-Unis et l'Iran autour du détroit d'Hormuz, exercera une pression inflationniste et influencera la campagne présidentielle américaine de novembre. Pour reconquérir les électeurs préoccupés par le coût de la vie, Hayes prédit que Donald Trump pourrait adopter un discours critique envers l'industrie de l'intelligence artificielle, promettant régulation et taxation. Une telle rhétorique, même tactique, pourrait provoquer un éclatement de la bulle des actions AI, d'autant plus que le secteur est déjà vulnérable à la hausse des coûts énergétiques et à l'introduction en bourse massive prévue de SpaceX, Anthropic et OpenAI. Hayes explique que la liquidité monétaire récente a été entièrement absorbée par le boom de l'IA, laissant peu de capitaux pour le bitcoin. Une correction sévère des actions AI entraînerait donc probablement une pression vendeuse sur l'ensemble des actifs risqués, y compris les cryptomonnaies. En conséquence, son fonds, Maelstrom, a vendu ses actions AI, réduit ses positions cryptos secondaires et se concentre désormais sur le pétrole et le gaz, ainsi que sur le bitcoin et l'ether en vue d'une reprise future après un éventuel krach et une nouvelle réponse monétaire accommodante des banques centrales.

marsbitIl y a 21 mins

Arthur Hayes dans un nouvel article : La bulle de l'IA approche de son éclatement, le marché crypto sous pression à court terme

marsbitIl y a 21 mins

Le « plan pour l'avenir » d'OpenAI : rendre l'IA bénéfique pour chaque personne dans le monde

Toutes les quelques générations, une nouvelle technologie transforme radicalement la société, à l’image de l’électricité au XXe siècle. L'électricité, initialement conçue pour simplifier la vie, a finalement ouvert de vastes possibilités, prolongé l’espérance de vie et accru la prospérité. L'IA est aujourd’hui à l’aube d’un impact similaire. Le potentiel de l’IA ne réside pas dans la technologie elle-même, mais dans ce que les gens peuvent en faire : comprendre une facture médicale, apprendre, créer une entreprise, accompagner des proches, concrétiser des idées ou faire avancer la science. OpenAI est convaincu que l’IA doit être accessible à tous, partout et selon les besoins de chacun, pour servir l’humanité et amplifier ses capacités, sans la remplacer. L’automatisation totale n’est pas un avenir souhaitable. Cette vision repose sur trois objectifs clés : construire un chercheur en IA automatisé pour accélérer la recherche (avec pour perspective qu’une part significative des travaux d’OpenAI soit menée en collaboration avec l’IA d’ici 2028) ; accélérer le progrès économique tout en veillant à une large répartition des bénéfices ; et offrir à chacun sur Terre un AGI personnel pour bénéficier de cette technologie transformatrice. Pour y parvenir, OpenAI souligne que des avancées rapides rendent le jugement humain et la coopération mondiale plus essentiels que jamais. La sécurité, l’alignement sur les valeurs humaines et une coordination internationale sont fondamentales pour gérer les risques. L’avenir doit être façonné collectivement, et non par une poignée d’entreprises. Enfin, une distribution large du pouvoir est vue comme la clé d’un futur meilleur et plus résilient. Un avenir où l’IA profite réellement à l’humanité doit être construit et partagé par de nombreuses personnes, entreprises, communautés et nations. Si elle est réalisée correctement, l’IA peut devenir une pierre angulaire pour la productivité, la créativité et la prospérité de tous.

marsbitIl y a 28 mins

Le « plan pour l'avenir » d'OpenAI : rendre l'IA bénéfique pour chaque personne dans le monde

marsbitIl y a 28 mins

Anthropic transforme les lancements de modèles en un langage que le marché comprend alors que le dernier modèle Claude arrive demain

TL;DR : Anthropic, évaluée à près de 1 000 milliards de dollars après un dernier tour de financement, a déposé confidentiellement son projet d'introduction en bourse (S-1). Cette étape coïncide avec des rumeurs concernant le prochain modèle Claude 5 (Fable 5), qui est déjà intégré au récit financier de la société. L'entreprise est désormais perçue comme un futur grand plateforme d'IA publique, devant démontrer sa valeur via des indicateurs concrets : croissance des revenus (plus de 470 milliards de dollars annualisés), fidélité de la clientèle entreprise, maîtrise des coûts de calcul et gestion des risques, notamment liés à la sécurité. La sortie présumée de Claude 5 est vue comme un signal crucial de sa capacité à maintenir son avance technologique. Le projet Mythos, un modèle frontalier aux capacités contrôlées destiné à la cybersécurité, offre à Anthropic un récit de valorisation distinct, axé sur les tâches complexes et à haute valeur pour les entreprises. Cependant, cette puissance implique aussi des responsabilités et des risques de régulation accrus qui devront être divulgués dans le S-1. À terme, le marché évaluera Anthropic non seulement sur la puissance de ses modèles, mais sur sa capacité à transformer cette avance en une croissance rentable et durable, en réduisant les coûts unitaires et en construisant un écosystème logiciel solide. La comparaison avec OpenAI portera moins sur la suprématie d'un modèle que sur la capacité à générer des revenus stables avec une incertitude maîtrisée.

marsbitIl y a 48 mins

Anthropic transforme les lancements de modèles en un langage que le marché comprend alors que le dernier modèle Claude arrive demain

marsbitIl y a 48 mins

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片