Moreno Indicates Negotiations on 'Transparency Act' Have Concluded Ahead of Vote to End Debate

cryptonews.ruPublié le 2026-08-08Dernière mise à jour le 2026-08-08

Résumé

Debates in the U.S. Senate regarding the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" (CLARITY Act) are concluding ahead of a crucial procedural vote. Senator Bernie Moreno announced that negotiations between Republicans and Democrats are finished, stating there is nothing left to settle and that all parties are expected to fulfill an agreement reached weeks ago. He framed the upcoming cloture vote on the bill as a choice for senators between supporting American industry or ceding dominance to China. While Moreno anticipates support from all 53 Senate Republicans, some within his party, including Senators Jerry Moran and Josh Hawley, have expressed opposition. Their concerns center on the bill's potential negative impact on small-town banks and the availability of agricultural loans in their states. Even with full Republican support, passing the CLARITY Act requires 60 votes, meaning at least 7 Democrats would need to vote in favor. Analysts view this as unlikely, citing ongoing ethics discussions with the White House related to President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency initiatives as a major obstacle.

Debates ahead of the U.S. Senate's consideration of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act are drawing to a close.

Senator Bernie Moreno did not wait for further negotiations between Democrats and Republicans, stating that the negotiation phase has concluded.

On social media, Moreno emphasized that "there is nothing 'to settle,'" explaining that an agreement was reached several weeks ago and that "all parties to this agreement are expected to fulfill their obligations."

"Eleven months of negotiations between Republican senators and Democratic senators have officially concluded, and every senator will have the opportunity to vote," he noted, referring to the cloture motion filed by Senate Majority Leader John Thune on September 15 regarding the motion to proceed to consideration of the CLARITY Act.

Moreno placed the blame for the CLARITY Act's potential failure on Senate Democrats, stating they will have to choose between ceding the industry to China and supporting American exceptionalism to preserve the dominant position of U.S. industry.

"If you love America, the choice is obvious!" he concluded.

While Moreno believes all 53 Republican senators will vote for the bill, some have expressed concerns about the implications of the CLARITY Act for local banks.

Senators Jerry Moran and Josh Hawley, both Republicans, have publicly stated they will oppose the CLARITY Act in its current form.

In statements given to Politico, Hawley noted that his constituents in Missouri are very concerned. "Specifically, farmers and ranchers are extremely worried that the outflow of deposits from small towns could completely deprive them of the opportunity to obtain agricultural loans," he stated.

Moran also raised similar arguments against the CLARITY Act, citing "consequences for people who rely on banks in small towns across Kansas" as the reason for his recent opposition.

Even with full support from all Republican senators, passing the CLARITY Act would require 60 votes, meaning the Republican Party would need to sway at least 7 Democrats to their side. Some analysts consider this goal unlikely, as the ethics provision, still being negotiated with the White House, is a stumbling block for CLARITY's success due to President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency initiatives.

Questions liées

QAccording to Senator Bernie Moreno, what is the status of negotiations for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act?

AAccording to Senator Bernie Moreno, the negotiation stage is over. He stated that an agreement was reached weeks ago and that the negotiating phase between Democratic and Republican senators has officially concluded after eleven months.

QWhat did Senator Moreno imply is at stake for the U.S. if the CLARITY Act fails, and who does he blame for this potential failure?

ASenator Moreno implied that if the CLARITY Act fails, the U.S. risks losing its industry's dominant position to China. He placed the responsibility for the act's potential failure on Senate Democrats, stating they would have to choose between handing the industry to China or supporting American exceptionalism.

QWhat procedural step did Majority Leader John Thune take on September 15 regarding the CLARITY Act, as mentioned by Senator Moreno?

AOn September 15, Majority Leader John Thune filed a cloture motion regarding the motion to proceed to consideration of the CLARITY Act. This motion seeks to end debate and advance to a vote on the bill.

QWhich Republican senators have publicly stated they will oppose the CLARITY Act in its current form, and what are their primary concerns?

ARepublican Senators Jerry Moran and Josh Hawley have publicly stated they will oppose the CLARITY Act. Their primary concerns center on the potential negative impact on local banks and communities in their states, such as the outflow of deposits from small towns affecting agricultural loans and hurting people who rely on small-town banks.

QWhat are the two main obstacles, as mentioned in the article, that the CLARITY Act must overcome to be passed in the Senate?

AThe two main obstacles for the CLARITY Act are: 1) Gaining enough votes for cloture to end debate and proceed, which requires 60 votes. With all 53 Republicans supporting it, the bill would still need at least 7 Democratic votes. 2) An ongoing ethics provision discussion with the White House, which is a sticking point related to President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency initiatives and complicates Democratic support.

Lectures associées

Après une baisse de moitié des volumes, les deux grandes plateformes d'échange coréennes lancent une guerre de listing

Alors que le marché boursier sud-coréen (KOSPI) connaissait une forte agitation au premier semestre, attirant massivement les capitaux des investisseurs particuliers, le marché cryptographique local a subi une forte baisse des volumes. Les transactions sur les cinq principales plateformes d'échange en won (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, Gopax) ont chuté de près de 50% au deuxième trimestre par rapport à 2025. Cependant, avec le récent ralentissement de l'activité et de l'effet de richesse sur le marché boursier depuis juillet, les deux plus grands échanges cryptographiques du pays, Upbit et Bithumb, ont intensifié leur concurrence en listant de nouveaux actifs. En un peu plus d'un mois jusqu'à mi-août, chacun a ajouté 17 nouvelles paires de trading en won, un rythme nettement supérieur à leur moyenne mensuelle du premier semestre. Cette "guerre des listings" vise à capturer l'attention limitée et les fonds à risque des investisseurs particuliers dans un marché désormais stagnant. Les nouveaux jetons listés, comme CAP ou GRVT, génèrent déjà une part significative du volume quotidien sur Upbit. Toutefois, cette stratégie semble principalement redistribuer l'activité existante plutôt qu'à ramener de nouveaux capitaux. Upbit a ainsi gagné des parts de marché malgré une baisse globale de son volume. Dans cette compétition pour des parts d'un marché rétréci, les choix de listings des deux géants tendent à converger, listant souvent les mêmes actifs à quelques jours d'intervalle. Pour ces plateformes dont les revenus dépendent essentiellement des frais de transaction, créer de nouveaux points d'intérêt trading est devenu une tactique cruciale pour retenir les utilisateurs et leur liquidité.

marsbitIl y a 16 mins

Après une baisse de moitié des volumes, les deux grandes plateformes d'échange coréennes lancent une guerre de listing

marsbitIl y a 16 mins

La grande évasion du marché coréen derrière la perte de 150 millions de Hong Kong par un trader de 26 ans

Un trader de Hong Kong âgé de 26 ans, en poste depuis seulement six mois, a été arrêté après avoir provoqué des pertes colossales de 150 millions de dollars de Hong Kong. Il a utilisé sans autorisation 50 millions de HKD de fonds de sa société pour un effet de levier et a spéculé sur un ETF à effet de levier lié à SK Hynix. Cette affaire illustre le retournement brutal du marché boursier sud-coréen en 2026. Au premier semestre, la demande d'IA a fait flamber les prix des puces mémoire, propulsant les actions de Samsung et SK Hynix et entraînant une ruée des investisseurs sud-coréens et mondiaux. La bulle a été alimentée par un effet de levier massif et une structure d'indice trop concentrée sur ces deux géants. Le retournement a commencé en juin avec des déclenchements répétés du mécanisme de "circuit breaker" (interruption des cotations). Les ventes forcées liées au levier ont créé un cercle vicieux, effaçant des fortunes. De nombreux investisseurs particuliers se sont retrouvés ruinés et endettés. L'article analyse les causes profondes : la dépendance excessive au levier, la surconcentration de l'indice KOSPI, et l'erreur d'évaluer des actions cycliques (mémoire) comme des titres de croissance. Des investisseurs plus prudents en Chine continentale, limités par les canaux d'investissement, ont été relativement épargnés. Après la chute, les autorités ont régulé les produits à levier. Les investisseurs tirent des leçons : certains réduisent leur exposition, d'autres cherchent des opportunités dans des actifs sous-évalués. Les principes clés rappelés sont le rejet du levier financier, le respect des cycles économiques et la méfiance envers l'euphorie collective. L'histoire souligne que les rendements élevés s'accompagnent toujours de risques extrêmes.

marsbitIl y a 25 mins

La grande évasion du marché coréen derrière la perte de 150 millions de Hong Kong par un trader de 26 ans

marsbitIl y a 25 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片