From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing the Prediction Market Involution Index and Anti-Harvesting Strategies

marsbitPublié le 2026-01-16Dernière mise à jour le 2026-01-16

Résumé

From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing Prediction Market Competition and Anti-Sybil Strategies Prediction markets require real capital, filtering out low-effort users but introducing financial risk. Key precautions include regulatory awareness, risk management, and understanding market manipulation risks. Effective participation demands analytical skills and careful attention to contract terms. Blind betting often leads to losses; hedging across platforms can reduce unilateral risk. Polymarket leads with $22B+ funding, 920K traders, and strong U.S. re-entry prospects. It is highly competitive but worth engaging with cost control. Kalshi, with $16B funding and CFTC regulation, has high transaction volume but no clear token plan, making participation less cost-effective. Opinion shows rapid growth, clear airdrop expectations, and strong backing, but requires strategic engagement. Predict.fun, backed by YZi Labs, has lower competition and explicit airdrops, attracting users primarily for points farming. Probable, incubated by PancakeSwap, is in early stages with zero fees and a referral-based points system, presenting low competition and high potential. Overall, evaluate projects based on backing, user competition, and incentive structures before committing funds.

Original author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Airdrop hunting has evolved into a sophisticated investment. However, in the highly sought-after prediction market sector, not all projects are worth investing time and capital in.

Prediction markets, in particular, differ from zero-cost testnet tasks as they usually require placing bets with "real money." Although the amount per bet is controllable, this "pay-to-play" threshold directly filters out a large number of pure freeloading script users and also brings the risk of capital attrition for real users.

If you're still debating which project to place your chips on in 2026, this article will help you analyze from three dimensions: reasons for attention, level of involution (competitive data), and cost-effectiveness of interaction.

But before charging in, please read this "self-defense" guide first:

  • Regulatory risks.
  • Do not participate with funds you cannot afford to lose.
  • Prediction markets are susceptible to bot manipulation, market manipulation, and insider trading.
  • Participating in prediction market interactions requires you to have some judgment ability regarding news hotspots, sports events, or crypto industry dynamics.
  • Read the resolution rules clearly, including the contract's specified sources, whether the deadline includes the day itself, wording traps, etc.
  • If you place bets blindly just to刷 interactions, you will most likely face the risk of losing your principal. Data from Hubble AI shows that "on Polymarket, the most active retail trader group (mid-frequency), although having the highest win rate on the platform, has a median actual return close to zero due to limitations in capital efficiency and a lack of systematic advantage."
  • Try hedging strategies: For uncertain prediction markets, avoid one-sided bets; try cross-platform hedging instead. Although there is price difference and slippage wear, this can minimize the risk of one-sided betting and focus on刷 trading volume. It is particularly important to note that no trading strategy can completely avoid risk; carefully evaluate when operating.

Polymarket

Why is it worth attention?

  • Leader in prediction markets;
  • Cumulative financing exceeds $22 billion, including a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Polymarket CMO Matthew Modabber confirmed the POLY token and airdrop plan in October 2025.
  • Polymarket has been approved by the CFTC to launch in the US and is returning to the US market.
  • Strong expectations for a token launch and retrospective airdrop in 2026.

How competitive is it?

  • Nearly 920,000 cumulative traders, a large user base.
  • Monthly active users have remained above 460,000 for the last 3 months, indicating stable user stickiness.
  • Weekly trading volume has been above $1 billion in recent weeks.
  • The average number of transactions per active wallet per day increased from less than 10 in December 2025 to a peak of 23 in early January, showing a surge in trading activity.
  • In terms of average bet size, 20.69% of users average bets below $10, 30.35% average between $10 and $50, 23.91% average between $100 and $500, and 0.24% average over $10,000.

Is it worth interacting with?

Worth participating, but costs must be strictly controlled. As a heavily competitive project, its potential airdrop scale is highly attractive. However, Polymarket's mature user ecosystem means a large number of historical traders have already occupied part of the retrospective airdrop quota. New users should rationally evaluate the input-output ratio. In October 2025, according to Bloomberg, Polymarket was in early talks with investors to raise funds at a valuation of $120-150 billion, a more than tenfold increase from four months prior, indicating continuous appreciation of the project's value.

Kalshi

Why is it worth attention?

  • Cumulative financing is close to $16 billion. The most recent Series E round occurred in December 2025, raising $1 billion at an $11 billion valuation, with participation from Sequoia, a16z, ARK Invest, Y Combinator, etc., doubling the valuation compared to the $3 billion financing in October 2025.
  • Regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
  • Kalshi has not officially disclosed any token or airdrop plans. However, based on its recent expansion into the crypto ecosystem, community analysis suggests airdrop expectations exist.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume reached $30 billion.
  • Notional trading volume has been spiraling upward since August 2025, with recent weeks seeing volumes between $1.5 billion and $2 billion, showing steady growth momentum.
  • Total number of trades is close to 130 million, placing its trading activity at the forefront of the prediction market field.

Is it worth interacting with?

Participate cautiously, low cost-effectiveness. On one hand, the project has no clear token issuance or airdrop timeline, making it highly uncertain; on the other hand, Kalshi charges transaction fees, making刷 volume costly. Furthermore, its mature business model suggests a relatively lower need for token incentives, making the likelihood of an airdrop relatively limited.

Opinion

Why is it worth attention?

  • Opinion is one of the fastest-growing prediction markets, with growth rates significantly领先 most competitors in the same period.
  • Opinion was selected for the 7th season of YZi Labs' MVB accelerator program in 2024.
  • Opinion completed a $5 million seed round led by YZi Labs in March 2025. In December, the Opinion team disclosed receiving additional tens of millions of dollars in funding support.
  • Opinion launched a points system simultaneously with its mainnet launch in October 2025, indicating clear airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • From October 2025 to present, Opinion's cumulative notional trading volume reached $15.3 billion, second only to Polymarket ($44.8 billion) and Kalshi ($30 billion).
  • Current Opinion TVL exceeds $140 million.
  • Over 170,000 cumulative traders.
  • The number of daily trading users reached over 40,000 from late December to early January, and has been between 10,000 and 20,000 users in the last 10 days.

Is it worth interacting with?

Quite competitive, but with clear airdrop expectations and strong backing from YZi Labs. Note that weekly trading volume needs to exceed $200 to steadily earn weekly leaderboard points. Points weight covers multiple dimensions including limit order liquidity provision, trade size, holding time bonus, etc., requiring a reasonable interaction strategy.

Predict.fun

Why is it worth attention?

  • Predict.fun was selected for the second season of YZi Labs' incubation program EASY Residency in December 2025.
  • Predict.fun is a BNB Chain native prediction market incubated and invested in by YZi Labs. Founder dingaling previously caused controversy due to the failure of boop.fun and "rat trading" allegations, and was criticized by Changpeng Zhao (CZ), though they later reconciled, and the negative impact has gradually subsided.
  • Predict.fun integrates with the Venus protocol, allowing users to continuously generate yield on funds used for betting during the waiting period for results (applicable to some short-term markets).
  • Features a points mechanism, with explicit airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume of $320 million, with prediction trading volume exceeding $200 million.
  • 478,000 cumulative trades, 36,000 cumulative unique trading users, averaging 13 trades per user.
  • Since mid-December, daily active users have mostly been between 2,000 and 4,000, indicating a relatively small user base.
  • Current TVL is approximately $22.58 million.

Is it worth interacting with?

Medium to low competition. Compared to Polymarket, where mostly veterans and institutions博弈, most people on Predict.fun place bets just to刷 interactions. Strategies to accumulate PP points include trading on the platform, providing meaningful liquidity, holding positions, etc.

Probable

Why is it worth attention?

  • Probable is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs, with orthodox backing.
  • Probable launched a points program on January 12, 2026, though it currently only supports earning points through invitations.
  • Zero transaction fees.

How competitive is it?

  • Since December 18, 2025, cumulative notional trading volume is $560 million, with prediction trading volume reaching $380 million.
  • 12,389 cumulative users. From late December 2025 to early January 2026, daily active users were between 500 and 1,000. Since early January, daily activity has gradually increased, with single-day DAU above 4,000 on both January 14 and 15.
  • 834,357 cumulative trades, averaging 67 trades per user.
  • Average trade size is $425, average total trading size per user is $3,357.

Is it worth interacting with?

Low competition. Probable launched in mid-December and is currently in its early stages. Note that referrers must first complete $100 in cumulative trading volume to unlock and generate an invitation code. Additionally, as a project incubated by PancakeSwap, its token is highly likely to launch through PancakeSwap's CAKE.PAD and might even be listed directly on Binance.

Questions liées

QWhat are the main risks mentioned for participating in prediction markets?

AThe main risks include regulatory uncertainty, potential loss of capital, susceptibility to bot manipulation and insider trading, the need for knowledge about current events to make informed bets, and the importance of understanding market rules to avoid pitfalls.

QWhich prediction market is considered the leader and has received over $22 billion in funding, including a strategic investment from ICE?

APolymarket is considered the leader in the prediction market space and has received over $22 billion in cumulative funding, which includes a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.

QWhat is a key strategy suggested to minimize risk when participating in prediction markets for airdrop farming?

AA key risk mitigation strategy is to use a hedging approach by placing opposing bets on the same market across different platforms. While this incurs some cost from spreads and slippage, it significantly reduces the risk of a single-sided bet, allowing a user to focus on generating trading volume.

QAccording to the article, which prediction market has an explicit points system and a strong expectation of an airdrop?

AOpinion has an explicit points system that was launched with its mainnet in October 2025, creating a strong expectation within the community that it will conduct an airdrop.

QWhich newly launched prediction market is noted for having low competition (low 'roll' or '卷') and is incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs?

AProbable is the newly launched prediction market noted for its low level of competition. It is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs and is still in its early stages of growth.

Lectures associées

Le marché actions A sacrifié : résilience, anticipations et fondamentaux

**Résumé :** En juillet, le secteur technologique des actions A a été affecté par la contagion du risque lié aux ventes forcées sur les marchés coréen et mondiaux. Cependant, cette correction est principalement due à des facteurs externes plutôt qu'à un renversement de la dynamique fondamentale du secteur technologique chinois. Contrairement au marché coréen, très concentré sur les puces mémoire, le secteur technologique A est diversifié, avec des récits d'investissement tant sur les chaînes d'approvisionnement mondiales de l'IA que sur la substitution aux importations. Les autorités ("l'équipe nationale") sont intervenues massivement pour soutenir le marché, avec des engagements d'achats substantiels d'actions et d'ETF, signalant un soutien politique fort et un plancher potentiel du marché. Parallèlement, le marché dans son ensemble bénéficie d'une dynamique de récupération endogène dans trois domaines clés : la consommation (amélioration des prix à la consommation, reprise potentielle des spiritueux), les matières premières cycliques comme l'aluminium (profits élevés, perspectives de hausse des prix, faibles valorisations) et la finance (actifs à dividendes stables, valorisations basses). Ces trois piliers, combinés à la solidité sous-jacente de la technologie, confèrent au marché A une résilience importante, suggérant que le retour à la stabilité n'est peut-être pas loin.

marsbitIl y a 21 mins

Le marché actions A sacrifié : résilience, anticipations et fondamentaux

marsbitIl y a 21 mins

Où sera le champ de bataille principal du prochain bull market ? La réponse se cache dans ces deux types d'actifs

Le marché des cryptomonnaies montre des signes de reprise. Le prochain cycle haussier sera probablement axé sur la fusion entre la finance traditionnelle et la finance décentralisée (DeFi), notamment via l'adoption des stablecoins, la tokenisation d'actifs et des infrastructures de négociation 24h/24 et 7j/7. Cette évolution, soutenue par une valeur utilitaire réelle, vise le marché financier mondial. Deux actifs illustrent cette convergence : **Hyperliquid (HYPE)**, une blockchain de dérivés perpétuels qui étend son offre aux actifs traditionnels comme le pétrole, et **Robinhood (HOOD)**, un courtier traditionnel qui a lancé sa propre blockchain pour la négociation d'actions tokenisées. Pour en tirer parti, deux types d'investissements se distinguent : 1. Les applications DeFi natives avec des revenus réels et un modèle économique robuste, comme Hyperliquid, qui utilise la majorité de ses revenus pour racheter et brûler son token. 2. Les entreprises financières traditionnelles qui déploient activement des infrastructures blockchain à grande échelle, comme Robinhood, Coinbase ou BlackRock. La prochaine étape majeure sera l'intégration invisible de la blockchain au cœur du système financier. Les investisseurs ont intérêt à se positionner dès maintenant sur cette tendance de fond.

Foresight NewsIl y a 36 mins

Où sera le champ de bataille principal du prochain bull market ? La réponse se cache dans ces deux types d'actifs

Foresight NewsIl y a 36 mins

Kalshi contre Polymarket : la guerre commerciale entre fondateurs est bien plus féroce qu'il n'y paraît

En novembre 2024, le fondateur de Polymarket, Shayne Coplan, a été perquisitionné par le FBI. Derrière cette enquête se cache une rivalité féroce avec son concurrent Kalshi, dirigé par Tarek Mansour. Les deux plateformes de marchés prédictifs, bien que leaders du secteur, s'affrontent bien au-delà de la concurrence commerciale habituelle. Le conflit oppose leurs approches radicalement différentes. Kalshi privilégie une voie strictement réglementée aux États-Unis, tandis que Polymarket a opéré depuis l'étranger, restant accessible aux utilisateurs américains via un VPN, ce qui a attiré les foudres des régulateurs. Mansour considère les pratiques de Polymarket comme "illégales et contraires à l'éthique". Coplan, de son côté, est convaincu que Kalshi tente de l'éliminer par tous les moyens. La guerre s'étend à tous les domaines : batailles pour des investisseurs (comme l'Intercontinental Exchange), tentatives de saboter des acquisitions, sponsoring concurrentiel (Kalshi avec le Madison Square Garden), et campagnes médiatiques agressives. Des allégations de dénonciations aux autorités et de manipulation de l'opinion publique parsèment leur histoire. Aujourd'hui, Kalshi semble en tête avec une valorisation et un volume d'échanges plus élevés, mais Polymarket a finalement obtenu une licence américaine via une acquisition. Alors que le secteur explose, attirant une surveillance réglementaire accrue, l'animosité personnelle entre les deux fondateurs continue d'alimenter une lutte qui façonne l'avenir des marchés prédictifs.

marsbitIl y a 50 mins

Kalshi contre Polymarket : la guerre commerciale entre fondateurs est bien plus féroce qu'il n'y paraît

marsbitIl y a 50 mins

Pour acheter un médicament amaigrissant en cours de recherche, un groupe d'Américains apprend à payer en Bitcoin

Un Américain de 49 ans, initialement sceptique envers le Bitcoin, a finalement appris à utiliser cette cryptomonnaie pour acheter 20 flacons d'un médicament expérimental pour la perte de poids, le retatrutide, auprès d'un vendeur chinois. La motivation : une économie substantielle, le prix étant bien inférieur à celui du marché américain. Ce cas illustre un marché croissant où les peptides expérimentaux non approuvés par la FDA sont achetés en ligne par des consommateurs ordinaires, souvent novices en cryptomonnaies. Face au refus des réseaux de paiement traditionnels de servir ces vendeurs, le Bitcoin et les stablecoins sont devenus la principale méthode de paiement. Les analyses de Chainalysis et TRM Labs estiment que les paiements en cryptomonnaies pour ces peptides « gris » pourraient dépasser 100 millions de dollars annuels, bien que ce montant reste faible par rapport au marché noir global estimé entre 1 et 3 milliards de dollars. Ce phénomène trouve un écho dans des communautés à l'intersection de la science décentralisée (DeSci), du bio-hacking et de la cryptographie, comme en témoigne une conférence populaire à New York sur les peptides. Cependant, l'avenir de ce cas d'usage des cryptomonnaies est incertain. Les autorités américaines, dont la FDA, envisagent une régularisation partielle de certains peptides, ce qui pourrait réduire la dépendance au marché noir et, par conséquent, à ses canaux de paiement alternatifs. L'acheteur interviewé, Zach, a quant à lui déclaré avoir atteint son poids cible et prévoit d'arrêter ses achats.

marsbitIl y a 55 mins

Pour acheter un médicament amaigrissant en cours de recherche, un groupe d'Américains apprend à payer en Bitcoin

marsbitIl y a 55 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片