Prediction Markets Can Hedge Crypto Startups' Regulatory Risk, Paradigm Says

CoinDeskPolicyPublié le 2024-01-31Dernière mise à jour le 2024-02-01

Résumé

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsham's venture capital firm filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Kalshi's case against the CFTC.

Paradigm, the venture capital firm led by Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam, filed a legal brief supporting prediction market platform Kalshi in its suit against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

In the case, filed in November, Kalshi asked the court to vacate the CFTC's denial of its bid to list contracts on which party will control each house of the U.S. Congress after an election. The regulator concluded that Kalshi, based in New York, was pursuing unlawful gambling "contrary to the public interest."

In a friend-of-the-court brief filed Thursday, Paradigm, which is not an investor in Kalshi, argued that such contracts could help businesses, including cryptocurrency startups, hedge their risks while producing positive spillover effects for the general public.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Paradigm is weighing in at a time of optimistic forecasts for long-languishing prediction markets, particularly those that run on crypto rails (unlike the CFTC-regulated Kalshi, which settles bets in U.S. dollars). In such markets, participants bet on the outcomes of real-world events, from the weather to military maneuvers.

Bullish outlook

Bitwise Asset Management, for example, forecasted in a December report that "more than $100 million will be staked in prediction markets, which will emerge as a new 'killer app' for crypto." That figure would represent double the peak reached in late 2021, according to Bitwise's analysis of data from The Block and DefiLlama.

A chart from Bitwise Asset Management's "The Year Ahead:
10 Crypto Predictions for 2024"
A chart from Bitwise Asset Management's "The Year Ahead: 10 Crypto Predictions for 2024"

Polymarket, the leading crypto-based prediction market platform, logged its biggest volume month in January, according to Dune Analytics data shared on X (formerly Twitter) by Rob Hadick, a general partner at Dragonfly, another VC firm.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hedging risk

"Paradigm has an interest in this case because prediction markets could be an impactful use case for crypto and related technologies in which Paradigm invests," the firm said in the filing with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

For example, the brief described a hypothetical "entrepreneur who is building a crypto startup in the U.S. The likelihood that Congress will pass legislation that will impact the viability of U.S.-based crypto startups is directly affected by which party is in control of Congress. … The entrepreneur may therefore want to buy an event contract that pays out depending on which party takes control."

Echoing a longstanding argument in favor of prediction markets, the brief went on, "when market participants hedge substantial sums on a particular event contract, members of the general public—even those who never join the market—get valuable real-time information."

Such markets "might even be better predictors of electoral outcomes than public opinion polling—precisely because they require participants to put their own skin in the game," Paradigm said.

Public benefit

Another friend-of-the-court brief filed Thursday supported Kalshi, this one by a prominent legal scholar.

Joseph A. Grundfest, a professor at Stanford Law School, made a similar appeal to the public good.

"In a world with miniscule poll response rates, sky-high polarization, and rampant fake news, prediction markets offer an objective indicator of the probability of particular election outcomes," he wrote.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The CFTC has about a month to respond to Kalshi's motion for summary judgment and present its own friend-of-the-court briefs. Kalshi would respond to those filings in March and the case may reach a conclusion in early April.

Lectures associées

Seconde mi-temps de la politique cryptographique américaine : La loi CLARITY tente d'obtenir 60 voix, le CFTC "comité d'une seule personne" est la plus grande inconnue

L'industrie de la cryptographie aux États-Unis attend un moment décisif avec l'avancée du projet de loi CLARITY au Sénat, qui nécessite 60 voix pour être adopté. Les républicains doivent négocier avec la Maison Blanche et rallier des sénateurs indécis. Dans un calendrier législatif chargé (seulement 40 jours de travail restants), d'autres propositions fiscales et réglementaires liées aux crypto-monnaies cherchent également à être intégrées dans des textes législatifs plus larges cette année. Un obstacle majeur est la composition incomplète de la CFTC, avec quatre postes de commissaires vacants, ce qui crée de l'incertitude. La question de la juridiction sur les marchés prédictifs (États, CFTC, SEC ou Cour suprême) reste également en suspens. Le secteur subira par ailleurs la perte de deux figures clés : la commissaire de la SEC, Hester M. Peirce, et la sénatrice Cynthia Lummis, qui ont joué un rôle central dans l'élaboration des politiques. Des experts soulignent que l'adoption de CLARITY durant cette session du Congrès est peu probable en raison des contraintes de temps et des élections. Ils estiment que des mesures fiscales ciblées sur les cryptos pourraient passer en étant intégrées à des projets de loi plus vastes. La CFTC travaille à un cadre pour les marchés prédictifs, dont le statut (infrastructure financière ou jeu) est crucial pour leur avenir. La fenêtre d'opportunité pour des progrès législatifs concrets en 2025 est étroite, exigeant une collaboration bipartite soutenue.

marsbitIl y a 1 h

Seconde mi-temps de la politique cryptographique américaine : La loi CLARITY tente d'obtenir 60 voix, le CFTC "comité d'une seule personne" est la plus grande inconnue

marsbitIl y a 1 h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片