India’s Budget 2026: New penalties hit crypto reporting – Is fresh ‘crackdown’ next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-01Last updated on 2026-02-01

Abstract

India's 2026 Union Budget introduces a new penalty framework to enforce crypto transaction reporting. Entities such as exchanges and intermediaries must submit detailed statements to tax authorities. Failure to file incurs a daily penalty of ₹200, while inaccurate reporting results in a flat ₹50,000 fine. The move aims to strengthen compliance, though the controversial 30% tax on gains and 1% TDS remain unchanged. This comes amid reports of significant trading volume migrating to offshore platforms due to strict tax policies. Increased regulatory scrutiny is already underway, with authorities identifying undisclosed crypto assets and issuing notices for potential non-compliance.

India’s Union Budget 2026 has introduced a new penalty framework to enforce crypto-asset transaction reporting.

In simple words, the new budget tightens oversight on exchanges and intermediaries even as the country’s controversial crypto tax regime remains unchanged.

The Finance Bill proposed penalties to enforce reporting obligations under Section 509 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Those obligations include requiring “prescribed reporting entities” to submit statements detailing crypto-asset transactions to the tax department. The changes will take effect from the 1st of April, 2026.

What the new penalty framework looks like

Under the new framework, entities that fail to furnish the required statement will face a penalty of Rs. 200 per day until the filing is completed.

A separate flat penalty of Rs. 50,000 will apply if inaccurate or misleading information is reported, or if errors are not corrected after being flagged.

It is clear that the intent is to move from a disclosure requirement with weak consequences to one backed by enforceable penalties.

Raj Karkara, COO of ZebPay, had this to say about the Union Budget of India,

“By introducing well-defined measures to address non-compliance, the Budget strengthens accountability while bringing digital asset reporting closer in line with established financial standards.”

The penalties apply to reporting entities such as crypto exchanges, marketplaces, and intermediaries, rather than directly to individual users. However, the changes are expected to have indirect effects on traders, as platforms tighten data collection, transaction tagging, and reconciliation processes to avoid penalties and regulatory scrutiny.

At the same time, the Budget left crypto taxation unchanged, retaining the 30% tax on virtual digital asset (VDAs) gains, the 1% tax deducted at source on transactions, and restrictions on setting off losses.

On this particular sentiment, Nischal Shetty, Founder, WazirX, commented,

“These measures continue to impact liquidity, participation and India’s competitiveness in the global digital asset landscape. We remain hopeful that future policy discussions will address these concerns in a manner that balances innovation, compliance, growth and ease of doing business.”

Why is enforcement tightening now

The compliance push came against the backdrop of significant offshore migration by Indian crypto traders.

A recent report by crypto tax platform KoinX found that nearly 72.7% of India’s crypto trading volume in FY25 – worth about Rs. 51,252 crore – shifted to offshore exchanges.

With regards to this, TDS accounted for just 0.60% of overall turnover on Indian exchanges – basically showing how transaction-level frictions have reshaped trading behavior.

This trend has also been flagged by AMBCrypto, which estimated that Indian users generated close to $5 trillion in crypto trading volume on offshore exchanges between late 2024 and 2025.

Scrutiny on disclosures is already rising

Tax authorities have also stepped up scrutiny of undisclosed crypto income.

In December, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said it had identified undisclosed VDAs worth Rs. 888.82 crore and sent more than 44,000 communications to taxpayers flagged for potential non-disclosure.


Final Thoughts

  • India’s budget introduced a formal penalty framework to enforce crypto-asset transaction reporting.
  • Failure to file reports attracts a Rs. 200-per-day penalty, while inaccurate or misleading reporting can trigger a flat Rs. 50,000 fine.

Related Questions

QWhat are the new penalties introduced in India's Union Budget 2026 for crypto-asset transaction reporting?

AThe Budget introduces two penalties: a Rs. 200 per day penalty for failing to furnish the required statement until filing is completed, and a flat Rs. 50,000 penalty for reporting inaccurate or misleading information or failing to correct errors after being flagged.

QWhich entities are directly subject to these new crypto reporting penalties?

AThe penalties apply to 'prescribed reporting entities' such as crypto exchanges, marketplaces, and intermediaries, rather than directly to individual users.

QDid the 2026 Budget change India's existing crypto tax rates?

ANo, the Budget left the crypto taxation regime unchanged, retaining the 30% tax on gains, the 1% TDS on transactions, and restrictions on setting off losses.

QWhat was a key reason cited for the tightening of enforcement on crypto reporting?

AThe compliance push came against the backdrop of significant offshore migration by Indian crypto traders, with a report finding nearly 72.7% of India's crypto trading volume had shifted to offshore exchanges.

QWhat action had Indian tax authorities already taken regarding undisclosed income before this Budget?

AThe Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had identified undisclosed Virtual Digital Assets worth Rs. 888.82 crore and sent over 44,000 communications to taxpayers flagged for potential non-disclosure.

Related Reads

Behind the 2000 BTC Incident: The Fundamental Problem of CEX Ledgers

On February 6, Bithumb, a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange, mistakenly distributed 2,000 BTC each to 249 users due to a unit error during a promotional event—intending to give away 2,000 KRW (≈$1.4) per user. The total erroneous distribution amounted to 62,000 BTC, worth approximately $41.5–44 billion. Although these assets existed only in Bithumb’s internal ledger and not on-chain, they were tradable on the platform, causing BTC/KRW prices to drop nearly 17% within minutes and triggering over $400 million in derivatives liquidations. Bithumb responded within 35 minutes, freezing affected accounts and recovering over 99% of the misallocated BTC. The remaining 1,788 BTC were covered by the exchange’s own funds. The incident exposed a fundamental flaw in centralized exchanges (CEXs): their reliance on internal accounting systems that allow rapid balance adjustments without corresponding on-chain assets. This creates systemic risk, as user balances are essentially IOU entries rather than real assets. The article draws parallels with historical failures like Mt.Gox and FTX, where discrepancies between internal ledgers and actual reserves led to catastrophic collapses. While Bithumb’s quick response limited damage, the event underscores the structural vulnerabilities of CEXs, prompting South Korean regulators to consider stricter oversight. The piece concludes that such incidents highlight the inherent trust asymmetry in CEX operations, where users rely on exchanges to honor ledger entries as real assets—a risk that remains ever-present.

比推25m ago

Behind the 2000 BTC Incident: The Fundamental Problem of CEX Ledgers

比推25m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片