Coinbase Executive Backs CLARITY Act Delay Amid Crypto Frustration

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-03Last updated on 2026-01-03

Abstract

Coinbase executive John D'Agostino supports the CLARITY Act's delay, emphasizing that the comprehensive market structure legislation requires careful consideration due to its foundational role in regulating digital assets. Unlike the simpler GENIUS Act passed earlier, the CLARITY Act involves defining jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight across multiple regulators, which takes time but is crucial for long-term industry growth. Despite causing frustration and contributing to capital outflows, the delay is seen as necessary to avoid future regulatory confusion. The White House has signaled potential progress in January, aiming to curb talent migration and provide clarity. While the act may not immediately impact markets like Bitcoin's price, its proper implementation is prioritized over haste, with potential to reshape U.S. digital asset operations for decades.


The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, widely known as the CLARITY Act, continues to test the patience of the US crypto industry. However, a senior executive at Coinbase says the delay is both expected and necessary, given the scope of what the legislation aims to achieve.

Speaking on CNBC on Friday, Coinbase’s institutional head of strategy John D’Agostino said he fully understands why the bill has not yet crossed the finish line.

“I completely understand why this is taking longer,” D’Agostino said. “It’s the kind of bill that is more foundational for the growth of crypto or any real asset class.” He added that lawmakers need time because the CLARITY Act addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate in the United States.

CLARITY Act faces deeper complexity than GENIUS Act

D’Agostino contrasted the CLARITY Act with the recently passed GENIUS Act, which became law in July. While he described the GENIUS Act as transformative, he said it focused on issues that were structurally simpler.

According to him, market structure legislation requires lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators. These factors naturally slow progress but also increase the long-term value of the outcome.

As a result, Coinbase believes patience now could prevent regulatory confusion later, especially as crypto markets grow and intersect more deeply with traditional finance.

White House signals progress in January

Optimism around the bill has not disappeared. Just weeks ago, White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks said lawmakers were close to advancing the CLARITY Act early next year.

“We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation,” Sacks said on Dec. 19, adding that the administration plans to “finish the job in January.”

Supporters argue that the bill could reduce uncertainty that has driven talent and capital overseas. D’Agostino echoed these sentiments and pointed out that the “massive talent migration” away from the US crypto sector is contributing to the pressure to legislative action.

Market impact and industry reaction

Nevertheless, despite these assurances, delays had impacted market sentiment. Asset manager CoinShares recently linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to prolonged regulatory uncertainty tied to the CLARITY Act.

However, not everyone expects the legislation to move markets immediately. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the bill, while important, may not significantly affect Bitcoin’s price in the short term.

“Is it world-shaking? No,” Brandt added. “It’s necessary but not value-definiting.”

Looking ahead

Coinbase, as well as most of the crypto industry, is focused on getting the right framework rather than hastened regulation. Even as frustration mounts, it seems CEOs place greater emphasis on having the right framework in place.

If Congress delivers clarity in 2026, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades, even if the wait proves difficult in the near term.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Can Dogecoin Sustain Its Recovery Above $0.135?

TagsBlockchainCoinbaseCryptocrypto regulationStablecoin

Related Questions

QWhy does Coinbase executive John D'Agostino believe the delay of the CLARITY Act is necessary?

AHe believes the delay is necessary because the CLARITY Act is a foundational bill that addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate, requiring lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators, which naturally takes more time.

QHow does the CLARITY Act differ from the recently passed GENIUS Act according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act addresses more complex structural issues like market jurisdiction and regulatory oversight, while the GENIUS Act, though transformative, focused on structurally simpler issues.

QWhat did White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks say about the progress of the CLARITY Act?

ADavid Sacks stated that lawmakers were closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation and that the administration plans to 'finish the job in January'.

QWhat market reaction has been linked to the delays in the CLARITY Act's passage?

AAsset manager CoinShares linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to the prolonged regulatory uncertainty caused by the delay of the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the long-term potential impact of the CLARITY Act if passed, according to the article?

AIf passed, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades by providing a clear regulatory framework, reducing uncertainty, and preventing future regulatory confusion.

Related Reads

a16z: Three Major AI Trends for 2026

a16z: Three AI Trends for 2026 1. AI Takes on Substantial Research Tasks: AI models are evolving to handle complex, abstract instructions and assist in research, particularly in reasoning. They are beginning to solve difficult problems and foster a new "generalist" research style that focuses on connecting ideas and making inferences from hypothetical answers. This requires new "nested agent" workflows where models collaborate and refine each other's outputs, though better model interoperability and compensation methods (potentially via blockchain) are needed. 2. The Shift from KYC to KYA (Know Your Agent): The bottleneck in the agent economy is shifting from intelligence to identity verification. With non-human identities vastly outnumbering humans in finance, there's a critical need for a "Know Your Agent" infrastructure. Agents require cryptographically signed credentials to transact, linking them to their principals, constraints, and liabilities. 3. Solving the Open Web's "Invisible Tax": AI agents are disrupting the economic foundation of the open web by extracting data from ad-supported sites (the context layer) while bypassing their revenue models. This creates an "invisible tax" that threatens content creation. Solutions are needed to automatically reward content creators, moving from static licensing to real-time compensation systems using technologies like nanopayments and attribution standards, potentially blockchain-enabled.

marsbit10m ago

a16z: Three Major AI Trends for 2026

marsbit10m ago

6th Man Ventures Founder: Forget the 'Token vs. Equity' Debate, What Really Needs to Be Trusted?

Mike Dudas, founder of The Block and 6th Man Ventures, argues that the debate between tokens and equity misses the point: the real question is what deserves trust. He suggests there is no one-size-fits-all answer to whether a "dual token + equity" structure works. Instead, the core principle is trusting a team that is not only exceptional but also long-term oriented, committed to building a founder-led, enduring business like Binance. Dudas notes that for application-layer projects requiring sustained leadership, tokens often underperform compared to equity. Many DeFi 1.0 founders have left their projects, which are now maintained by DAOs in "maintenance mode," struggling with slow and ineffective decision-making. Pure equity isn’t always superior either—tokens enable functions like fee discounts, staking for airdrops, and access rights, which equity can’t easily replicate. He proposes a hybrid model: an equity entity operates on a "cost-plus" basis to serve a token-driven protocol, aiming not to maximize its own profits but to maximize the token’s and ecosystem’s value. This requires high trust in the team, as token holders lack strong legal rights. Ultimately, success depends on the team’s capability, credibility, execution, vision, and action. The best tokens will thrive by 2026 if teams communicate well, conduct buybacks, enable substantive governance, and direct value to the token through utility.

marsbit11m ago

6th Man Ventures Founder: Forget the 'Token vs. Equity' Debate, What Really Needs to Be Trusted?

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片