From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing the Prediction Market Involution Index and Anti-Harvesting Strategies

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-16Actualizado a 2026-01-16

Resumen

From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing Prediction Market Competition and Anti-Sybil Strategies Prediction markets require real capital, filtering out low-effort users but introducing financial risk. Key precautions include regulatory awareness, risk management, and understanding market manipulation risks. Effective participation demands analytical skills and careful attention to contract terms. Blind betting often leads to losses; hedging across platforms can reduce unilateral risk. Polymarket leads with $22B+ funding, 920K traders, and strong U.S. re-entry prospects. It is highly competitive but worth engaging with cost control. Kalshi, with $16B funding and CFTC regulation, has high transaction volume but no clear token plan, making participation less cost-effective. Opinion shows rapid growth, clear airdrop expectations, and strong backing, but requires strategic engagement. Predict.fun, backed by YZi Labs, has lower competition and explicit airdrops, attracting users primarily for points farming. Probable, incubated by PancakeSwap, is in early stages with zero fees and a referral-based points system, presenting low competition and high potential. Overall, evaluate projects based on backing, user competition, and incentive structures before committing funds.

Original author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Airdrop hunting has evolved into a sophisticated investment. However, in the highly sought-after prediction market sector, not all projects are worth investing time and capital in.

Prediction markets, in particular, differ from zero-cost testnet tasks as they usually require placing bets with "real money." Although the amount per bet is controllable, this "pay-to-play" threshold directly filters out a large number of pure freeloading script users and also brings the risk of capital attrition for real users.

If you're still debating which project to place your chips on in 2026, this article will help you analyze from three dimensions: reasons for attention, level of involution (competitive data), and cost-effectiveness of interaction.

But before charging in, please read this "self-defense" guide first:

  • Regulatory risks.
  • Do not participate with funds you cannot afford to lose.
  • Prediction markets are susceptible to bot manipulation, market manipulation, and insider trading.
  • Participating in prediction market interactions requires you to have some judgment ability regarding news hotspots, sports events, or crypto industry dynamics.
  • Read the resolution rules clearly, including the contract's specified sources, whether the deadline includes the day itself, wording traps, etc.
  • If you place bets blindly just to刷 interactions, you will most likely face the risk of losing your principal. Data from Hubble AI shows that "on Polymarket, the most active retail trader group (mid-frequency), although having the highest win rate on the platform, has a median actual return close to zero due to limitations in capital efficiency and a lack of systematic advantage."
  • Try hedging strategies: For uncertain prediction markets, avoid one-sided bets; try cross-platform hedging instead. Although there is price difference and slippage wear, this can minimize the risk of one-sided betting and focus on刷 trading volume. It is particularly important to note that no trading strategy can completely avoid risk; carefully evaluate when operating.

Polymarket

Why is it worth attention?

  • Leader in prediction markets;
  • Cumulative financing exceeds $22 billion, including a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Polymarket CMO Matthew Modabber confirmed the POLY token and airdrop plan in October 2025.
  • Polymarket has been approved by the CFTC to launch in the US and is returning to the US market.
  • Strong expectations for a token launch and retrospective airdrop in 2026.

How competitive is it?

  • Nearly 920,000 cumulative traders, a large user base.
  • Monthly active users have remained above 460,000 for the last 3 months, indicating stable user stickiness.
  • Weekly trading volume has been above $1 billion in recent weeks.
  • The average number of transactions per active wallet per day increased from less than 10 in December 2025 to a peak of 23 in early January, showing a surge in trading activity.
  • In terms of average bet size, 20.69% of users average bets below $10, 30.35% average between $10 and $50, 23.91% average between $100 and $500, and 0.24% average over $10,000.

Is it worth interacting with?

Worth participating, but costs must be strictly controlled. As a heavily competitive project, its potential airdrop scale is highly attractive. However, Polymarket's mature user ecosystem means a large number of historical traders have already occupied part of the retrospective airdrop quota. New users should rationally evaluate the input-output ratio. In October 2025, according to Bloomberg, Polymarket was in early talks with investors to raise funds at a valuation of $120-150 billion, a more than tenfold increase from four months prior, indicating continuous appreciation of the project's value.

Kalshi

Why is it worth attention?

  • Cumulative financing is close to $16 billion. The most recent Series E round occurred in December 2025, raising $1 billion at an $11 billion valuation, with participation from Sequoia, a16z, ARK Invest, Y Combinator, etc., doubling the valuation compared to the $3 billion financing in October 2025.
  • Regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
  • Kalshi has not officially disclosed any token or airdrop plans. However, based on its recent expansion into the crypto ecosystem, community analysis suggests airdrop expectations exist.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume reached $30 billion.
  • Notional trading volume has been spiraling upward since August 2025, with recent weeks seeing volumes between $1.5 billion and $2 billion, showing steady growth momentum.
  • Total number of trades is close to 130 million, placing its trading activity at the forefront of the prediction market field.

Is it worth interacting with?

Participate cautiously, low cost-effectiveness. On one hand, the project has no clear token issuance or airdrop timeline, making it highly uncertain; on the other hand, Kalshi charges transaction fees, making刷 volume costly. Furthermore, its mature business model suggests a relatively lower need for token incentives, making the likelihood of an airdrop relatively limited.

Opinion

Why is it worth attention?

  • Opinion is one of the fastest-growing prediction markets, with growth rates significantly领先 most competitors in the same period.
  • Opinion was selected for the 7th season of YZi Labs' MVB accelerator program in 2024.
  • Opinion completed a $5 million seed round led by YZi Labs in March 2025. In December, the Opinion team disclosed receiving additional tens of millions of dollars in funding support.
  • Opinion launched a points system simultaneously with its mainnet launch in October 2025, indicating clear airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • From October 2025 to present, Opinion's cumulative notional trading volume reached $15.3 billion, second only to Polymarket ($44.8 billion) and Kalshi ($30 billion).
  • Current Opinion TVL exceeds $140 million.
  • Over 170,000 cumulative traders.
  • The number of daily trading users reached over 40,000 from late December to early January, and has been between 10,000 and 20,000 users in the last 10 days.

Is it worth interacting with?

Quite competitive, but with clear airdrop expectations and strong backing from YZi Labs. Note that weekly trading volume needs to exceed $200 to steadily earn weekly leaderboard points. Points weight covers multiple dimensions including limit order liquidity provision, trade size, holding time bonus, etc., requiring a reasonable interaction strategy.

Predict.fun

Why is it worth attention?

  • Predict.fun was selected for the second season of YZi Labs' incubation program EASY Residency in December 2025.
  • Predict.fun is a BNB Chain native prediction market incubated and invested in by YZi Labs. Founder dingaling previously caused controversy due to the failure of boop.fun and "rat trading" allegations, and was criticized by Changpeng Zhao (CZ), though they later reconciled, and the negative impact has gradually subsided.
  • Predict.fun integrates with the Venus protocol, allowing users to continuously generate yield on funds used for betting during the waiting period for results (applicable to some short-term markets).
  • Features a points mechanism, with explicit airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume of $320 million, with prediction trading volume exceeding $200 million.
  • 478,000 cumulative trades, 36,000 cumulative unique trading users, averaging 13 trades per user.
  • Since mid-December, daily active users have mostly been between 2,000 and 4,000, indicating a relatively small user base.
  • Current TVL is approximately $22.58 million.

Is it worth interacting with?

Medium to low competition. Compared to Polymarket, where mostly veterans and institutions博弈, most people on Predict.fun place bets just to刷 interactions. Strategies to accumulate PP points include trading on the platform, providing meaningful liquidity, holding positions, etc.

Probable

Why is it worth attention?

  • Probable is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs, with orthodox backing.
  • Probable launched a points program on January 12, 2026, though it currently only supports earning points through invitations.
  • Zero transaction fees.

How competitive is it?

  • Since December 18, 2025, cumulative notional trading volume is $560 million, with prediction trading volume reaching $380 million.
  • 12,389 cumulative users. From late December 2025 to early January 2026, daily active users were between 500 and 1,000. Since early January, daily activity has gradually increased, with single-day DAU above 4,000 on both January 14 and 15.
  • 834,357 cumulative trades, averaging 67 trades per user.
  • Average trade size is $425, average total trading size per user is $3,357.

Is it worth interacting with?

Low competition. Probable launched in mid-December and is currently in its early stages. Note that referrers must first complete $100 in cumulative trading volume to unlock and generate an invitation code. Additionally, as a project incubated by PancakeSwap, its token is highly likely to launch through PancakeSwap's CAKE.PAD and might even be listed directly on Binance.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main risks mentioned for participating in prediction markets?

AThe main risks include regulatory uncertainty, potential loss of capital, susceptibility to bot manipulation and insider trading, the need for knowledge about current events to make informed bets, and the importance of understanding market rules to avoid pitfalls.

QWhich prediction market is considered the leader and has received over $22 billion in funding, including a strategic investment from ICE?

APolymarket is considered the leader in the prediction market space and has received over $22 billion in cumulative funding, which includes a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.

QWhat is a key strategy suggested to minimize risk when participating in prediction markets for airdrop farming?

AA key risk mitigation strategy is to use a hedging approach by placing opposing bets on the same market across different platforms. While this incurs some cost from spreads and slippage, it significantly reduces the risk of a single-sided bet, allowing a user to focus on generating trading volume.

QAccording to the article, which prediction market has an explicit points system and a strong expectation of an airdrop?

AOpinion has an explicit points system that was launched with its mainnet in October 2025, creating a strong expectation within the community that it will conduct an airdrop.

QWhich newly launched prediction market is noted for having low competition (low 'roll' or '卷') and is incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs?

AProbable is the newly launched prediction market noted for its low level of competition. It is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs and is still in its early stages of growth.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 32 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 32 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcryptoHace 34 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcryptoHace 34 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 48 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 48 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片