U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-07-22Actualizado a 2026-07-22

Resumen

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potenti...

Author: Long Yue

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21).Morgan Stanley's TMT momentum factor surged more than 12% in a single day, marking its largest single-day gain on record, even surpassing any single-day performance during the 2000 dot-com bubble. Goldman Sachs's High Beta Momentum Long Index (GSCBHMOM) rose about 8.5%, its strongest single-day performance since April 2025; the Long/Short High Beta Momentum Index (GSPRHIMO) jumped 9.5%, its strongest since 2021 and nearing historical highs since 2003.

The Nasdaq Composite Index rose about 1.3%, leading the three major indices.The semiconductor sector was the biggest driver—the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) gained 4.6%, while the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) rose about 4.5%. Micron Technology surged over 10%, Intel gained about 8.6%, SanDisk jumped about 14%, Cerebras Systems climbed about 18%, and Cipher Mining soared over 11%.

This rebound followed three consecutive days of declines and came after momentum stocks had plummeted 33% cumulatively.

Why This Rebound? Short Sellers Get "Squeezed"

To understand this rebound, one must first understand how deep the prior decline was.

Goldman Sachs data shows that high-beta momentum stocks plunged 33% cumulatively in just a few trading days, one of the most severe drawdowns since the dot-com bust. The Goldman Sachs High Beta Momentum Index briefly fell below its 200-day moving average, hitting its lowest level since January this year, with oversold conditions being the most severe since last August.

The deeper the fall, the greater the rebound's elasticity—a basic market principle.

This rebound was largely a "short squeeze" scenario. Investors heavily shorting momentum stocks, particularly trend-following traders in South Korea and Japan, suffered heavy losses in the past two weeks—the Korean market even saw large-scale margin call events that devastated local retail investors. When these short sellers are forced to cover their positions, buying forms a self-reinforcing upward spiral.

Zacks Investment Research analysis pointed out that Micron Technology had previously broken below the "head and shoulders" neckline on its daily chart, a bearish technical pattern. But its stock price surged over 10% on Tuesday, reclaiming the neckline. "False breakouts often trigger violent reversals because late-to-the-party shorts and bears get trapped."

Market Breadth Remains Weak, Rebound's Quality Questionable

The rebound numbers look astonishing, but the internal structure is not healthy.

BTIG strategist Jonathan Krinsky analyzed that Tuesday's overall trading volume was low, with SPY, QQQ, and S&P 500 spot volumes all 20% to 30% below their 20-day averages. Meanwhile, although the S&P 500 index rose nearly 1%, declining stocks still outnumbered advancing ones—this marks the highest frequency of price-breadth divergence this year, and it occurred again on Tuesday.

Goldman Sachs trader data shows overall exchange volume was about 17% below the 20-day average, with market maker book liquidity at only $6.83 million, and market activity scoring a mere 3 out of 10.

In other words, this rebound resembles a concentrated surge in a few heavily weighted stocks, not a broad-based recovery.

Bloomberg macro strategist Michael Ball analyzed, "It's too early to call the end of the correction." Demand for put options on semiconductor ETFs and previous AI star stocks remains high. Negative Gamma exposure in Nasdaq, semiconductor ETFs, and related stocks means market makers will chase momentum rather than smooth volatility—amplifying both upswings and downturns.

BTIG Warns: Rebound Has Hit Key Resistance, Advises Selling into Strength

Not everyone is optimistic about this rebound.

BTIG's Jonathan Krinsky explicitly warned, advising investors to "fade" the rally. He previously predicted momentum stocks would encounter strong resistance in the 730-750 range, and Tuesday's rebound precisely pushed the GSCBHMOM to the lower end of that resistance zone.

Krinsky stated: "Extreme volatility, combined with historic individual stock divergence, signals the market is undergoing a full-blown correction." He expects high-beta momentum stocks to start stalling on Wednesday-Thursday as they enter the core of the resistance zone.

Historical data shows that since 1999, the High Beta Momentum Long Index has recorded single-day gains exceeding 7% above its 200-day moving average only 10 times. Three occurred this year, three in early 2021, and three in early 2000. Krinsky noted this data "illustrates both the rarity of this move and that we continue to see statistical parallels to the 1999-2000 period."

Goldman, UBS: Momentum Sell-off Nearing End, Suggest Gradually Adding

Unlike BTIG's caution, Goldman Sachs and UBS both believe this momentum sell-off is nearing its end and suggest investors seize the opportunity.

Goldman's Julia Mensch noted in a report that Goldman had signaled last week the momentum sell-off was "entering late stages." She wrote: "With positioning already significantly reduced (Goldman Prime data shows momentum exposure at the 64th percentile over the past year, 93rd over five years), and with no new fundamental catalyst behind this sell-off, we see room for momentum to revert to its longer-term trend. This sell-off may be a good opportunity to add momentum exposure or buy AI stocks on the dip."

UBS Head of Hedge Fund Equity Derivatives Sales Michael Romano expressed similar views in a client note, citing improving AI fundamentals as a buy signal. However, he advised investors to "build positions gradually, rather than going all-in at once."

Romano wrote: "Momentum derisking is and remains a compelling call. Phasing in is prudent." He expects the momentum sell-off to bottom by the end of July (if it hasn't already) and stated: "Once the tide turns, I expect liquidity to push prices to overshoot on the upside."

Nevertheless, Goldman also retains some reservations—given recent extreme volatility and the dense earnings season, Goldman suggests investors gain exposure via "limited-loss structures" rather than direct long holdings.

Earnings Season Is the Next Key Variable

The sustainability of this rebound depends heavily on this week's earnings.

According to Reuters, 113 S&P 500 companies (representing about 18% of the index's market cap) report earnings this week. Among them, Alphabet's (GOOGL) report is seen as "the most important data point this week", with the market focusing on its full-year 2026 capital expenditure guidance—widely expected to be raised, providing crucial clues on the direction of AI spending.

LPL Financial Chief Technical Strategist Adam Turnquist said: "The focus now isn't just the total capex. The next focal point will be return on investment and the quality of spending, which we believe will become a core topic in the second half."

He added: "We expect continued volatility in the semiconductor sector as overbought conditions need to be digested, profit-taking pressure will emerge, and crowded positioning needs to unwind. Fundamentally, we don't see any material changes."

According to Reuters, so far, 66 S&P 500 companies have reported, with about 88% beating analyst profit estimates. 3M (MMM) surged over 9% and General Motors (GM) gained about 5%, both chased higher due to better-than-expected results.

Bonds & Macro: Another Hidden Risk

While the stock market celebrates, the bond market is sounding a warning.

Treasury yields rose across the board, with the short-end 2-year yield up 5 basis points and the long-end 30-year yield up 2 bps. Long-end yields climbed to two-month highs, eroding bond gains from last week's lower-than-expected inflation data.

Oil prices were one driver. Brent crude futures closed back above $90 per barrel for the first time since June 11. Middle East tensions continue to simmer—Yemen's Houthis announced a blockade of the southern Red Sea entrance, and two tankers carrying Saudi crude turned around in the Red Sea. Kpler's MarineTraffic data shows that even before the blockade announcement, cargo loaded passing through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait had fallen 34% over the past two weeks.

RBC Capital Markets rates strategist Izaac Brook said: "Today's market move is primarily the result of persistently higher energy prices. Rate moves are amplified by breaking through closely watched technical levels—4.20% for the 2-year and 4.60% for the 10-year—and the typically low-liquidity summer trading environment."

Bloomberg's Cameron Crise warned that long-bond yields are at a critical point where 5% could shift from resistance to support, with the next obvious target being 5.5%—"which would be a shock for equities, particularly if an upside economic surprise pushes yields higher and acts as a headwind for stocks."

Goldman Sachs IG credit head Kevin Boova also warned that credit spreads for hyperscale tech companies have hit new highs, "the hyperscale cloud/AI/data center space feels a bit fragile again."

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were some of the key performance metrics of the 'tech momentum stocks' rally on July 21st, according to the article?

AThe Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even performance during the dot-com bubble. Goldman Sachs's High Beta Momentum Long index rose about 8.5%, its strongest day since April 2025, and its High Beta Momentum Long/Short index jumped 9.5%, the strongest since 2021 and near its historical high from 2003. The Nasdaq Composite gained about 1.3%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) rose 4.6%, with VanEck Semiconductor ETF up about 4.5%. Specific stocks like Micron surged over 10%.

QWhat are two primary reasons provided in the article for the sharp rebound in momentum stocks?

AFirst, the rebound followed an extreme 33% cumulative sell-off, one of the most severe since the dot-com bubble, creating conditions for a high-elasticity bounce. Second, a significant factor was a 'short squeeze' where investors who had shorted momentum stocks, particularly leveraged traders in Korea and Japan facing margin calls, were forced to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral.

QWhy does BTIG strategist Jonathan Krinsky express caution about the rally and what action does he suggest?

AJonathan Krinsky is cautious because he views the rebound as technically weak, evidenced by low overall trading volume, poor market breadth (more declining than advancing stocks even as the S&P 500 rose), and its concentration in a few heavily weighted stocks. He warns that the rally has reached a key resistance zone (730-750 for the GSCBHMOM index) and suggests investors 'fade the rally,' meaning take profits or reduce exposure on strength.

QWhat is the contrasting view from Goldman Sachs and UBS regarding the momentum stock sell-off and their investment advice?

AGoldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum sell-off is nearing its end. Goldman's Julia Mensch notes that positioning has been significantly reduced and there's no new fundamental catalyst for the decline, suggesting room for a return to the long-term trend. They view it as an opportunity to add momentum/AI exposure. UBS's Michael Romano also suggests the sell-off is concluding and advises investors to 'build exposure gradually, not all at once.' However, Goldman recommends using 'limited-loss structures' due to high volatility.

QWhat are two major upcoming factors or risks highlighted in the article that could determine the sustainability of the market rebound?

AFirst, the ongoing earnings season is critical, with a focus on reports from 113 S&P 500 companies, especially Alphabet's (GOOGL) capital expenditure guidance for 2026, which will signal future AI investment trends. Second, macroeconomic and bond market risks pose a threat. Rising Treasury yields, driven partly by surging oil prices due to Middle East tensions, could pressure stocks. Analysts warn that if long-term yields break above key levels (like 5.5%), it would negatively impact the equity market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Bank of America (BofA) is making strategic moves in digital assets, appointing senior leaders to advance a platform covering stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody, and crypto settlement. This comes amid a broader discussion about the potential migration of trillions in bank deposits to stablecoins. A cited TBAC report estimated up to $6.6 trillion in transactional deposits could be at risk of moving to stablecoins long-term, a point BofA's CEO previously conditioned on stablecoins being allowed to pay interest. The regulatory landscape is evolving, with the GENIUS Act setting a final implementation deadline for January 2027. Major banks, however, are not waiting; JPMorgan, Citi, BofA, and others are already developing tokenized deposit networks and services. Industry observers note that while retail crypto trading is sluggish, institutional adoption of stablecoins for real-world use cases is driving growth. Despite the activity, some analysts remain cautious, noting banks have a long history of blockchain announcements and that true structural change is slow. The stablecoin market itself has seen a recent dip from its peak. Optimistic projections, however, foresee significant growth, with stablecoin settlement volume already reaching $33 trillion in 2025. The race is on for the post-January 2027 landscape, where regulatory clarity is expected to accelerate the fusion of traditional finance and crypto.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片