Stablecoins not a ‘systemic risk’: Coinbase pushes back on GENIUS Act critics

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

The debate over stablecoin regulation continues between the crypto industry and traditional banks. Coinbase strongly opposes claims that stablecoins pose a "systemic risk" to the U.S. financial system. Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad argues that stablecoins follow a secure government-backed model, unlike the risky money market funds that contributed to past financial crises. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal emphasizes that stablecoin reserves are backed dollar-for-dollar by short-term instruments like U.S. Treasuries and are not relent like traditional bank deposits. However, the proposed GENIUS Act allows stablecoin reserves to include riskier assets such as uninsured deposits and money market fund shares. Critics, including Better Markets and the Bank Policy Institute, warn this could make stablecoins vulnerable to bank-like runs. Despite ongoing discussions and a planned meeting among Senate Democrats, the future of stablecoin legislation remains uncertain, with no clear timeline for the bill's advancement.

The debate over stablecoin yields shows no signs of ending soon. At the center of the issue are two opposing sides, the crypto industry and traditional banks, both pushing for a compromise but remaining firmly divided.

Meanwhile, Coinbase has taken a strong position. The exchange has consistently pushed back against claims that stablecoins pose a “systemic risk” to the broader U.S. financial system.

Stablecoins are way safer, says Coinbase

In a recent statement, Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, dismissed claims that stablecoins mirror money market funds (MMFs), which triggered past financial crises.

Shirzad said that it was a misconception to equate risky prime MMFs that triggered the 2008 financial crisis with safer government-backed MMFs. According to Shirzad, stablecoins follow the ‘secure’ government model and will be “future safe haven.”

“But it is just the opposite (of projected financial crisis)– stablecoins will be the future safe haven.”

Another Coinbase official, Paul Grewal, the firm’s chief legal officer (CLO), echoed the same in a recent CNBC interview.

“Stablecoin issuer deposits (reserves) are not re-lent out like the fractionalized reserve system used by banks. They’re backed dollar-for-dollar in short-term instruments, principally U.S. Treasuries. They are much safer than the banks.”

Crypto bill on the lifeline

But not all the issuers’ reserves are backed by short-term bonds. The stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, allows for the reserves to include uninsured deposits, repurchase agreement loans, and shares of MMFs.

According to Better Markets, a financial reform nonprofit, this ‘risky’ reserve composition makes stablecoin vulnerable to bank-like runs seen in 2020 and 2008.

The same framing was applied by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), a lobby group for banks, which called stablecoins a ‘less regulated cousin’ of money market funds.

In fact, these arguments by Better Markets and BPI were the ones Shirzad addressed. The ongoing discussion is part of the larger push for compromise on stablecoin yield that has stalled the market structure bill.

Meanwhile, reports indicate that Democrats have planned a meeting to discuss the bill. This follows White House meeting held on the 2nd of February, to broker a stablecoin yield deal between banks and the crypto industry by the end of the month.

It remains unclear whether the bill will progress out of the Senate Banking Committee by Q1 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Coinbase officials have maintained that stablecoins are much safer and carry less risk than banks.
  • Senate Democrats planned a meeting on the crypto bill, but uncertainty remains on the legislation’s momentum.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument Coinbase makes against claims that stablecoins pose a systemic risk?

ACoinbase argues that stablecoins are much safer than banks and money market funds (MMFs) because their reserves are backed dollar-for-dollar in short-term instruments like U.S. Treasuries and are not re-lent out like in the fractionalized reserve banking system.

QAccording to the article, what does the GENIUS Act allow stablecoin reserves to include?

AThe GENIUS Act allows stablecoin reserves to include uninsured deposits, repurchase agreement loans, and shares of money market funds (MMFs).

QWhich two groups are mentioned as being opposed to the crypto industry's view on stablecoins?

AThe two groups opposed to the crypto industry's view are traditional banks, represented by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), and the financial reform nonprofit Better Markets.

QWhat specific event from the past do critics cite when warning about the risks of stablecoins?

ACritics cite the bank-like runs seen in the 2008 financial crisis and in 2020 as a risk for stablecoins, comparing their reserve composition to that of risky prime money market funds (MMFs).

QWhat is the current status of the stablecoin market structure bill according to the article?

AThe bill's progress is uncertain, and it remains unclear whether it will advance out of the Senate Banking Committee by the first quarter of 2026, despite planned meetings among Democrats to discuss it.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Tras el éxito de DeepSeek V4: Silicon Valley 'construye muros', China 'construye caminos'

El reciente lanzamiento de DeepSeek V4 y Kimi K2.6 destaca la creciente competencia en IA entre China y Silicon Valley. Mientras empresas estadounidenses como OpenAI y Anthropic se enfrascan en una lucha cerrada y competitiva por el dominio del mercado con modelos privativos, China está adoptando un enfoque colaborativo y de código abierto. DeepSeek V4, que encabeza la lista de modelos abiertos de Hugging Face, introduce avances significativos, como una capacidad de contexto ultra-larga y una optimización en el uso de memoria, además de una adaptación específica para chips chinos como los de Huawei y Cambricon. En lugar de competir agresivamente, empresas chinas como DeepSeek y Moonlight (creadora de Kimi) comparten abiertamente avances técnicos, como la arquitectura MLA y el optimizador Muon, lo que acelera la innovación y reduce costos. Este modelo colaborativo ha permitido a China desarrollar sistemas de IA avanzados con una fracción del costo de entrenamiento de sus contrapartes occidentales, al tiempo que impulsa la adopción de hardware local. Aunque los ingresos y valoraciones de las empresas chinas aún son inferiores a las de EE.UU., el crecimiento en el consumo de tokens y la eficiencia en costes sugieren un fuerte potencial a largo plazo. Mientras Silicon Valley levanta "muros" tecnológicos, China está "construyendo caminos" abiertos que podrían redefinir el futuro de la IA global.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Tras el éxito de DeepSeek V4: Silicon Valley 'construye muros', China 'construye caminos'

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Google y Amazon invierten simultáneamente en un competidor: la lógica empresarial más absurda de la era de la IA se está haciendo realidad

En 4 días, Amazon y Google invirtieron 65.000 millones de dólares en Anthropic, la startup de IA detrás del modelo Claude. Aunque son competidores directos en la nube, ambos apuestan por la misma empresa. La razón: no se trata de una inversión tradicional, sino de un acuerdo de prepago de capacidad computacional. Anthropic debe gastar el dinero en los servicios en la nube y chips de sus inversores, con compromisos que superan los 100.000 millones en AWS y 5 gigavatios de potencia en Google Cloud. El mercado de la nube ha cambiado: ahora las empresas eligen proveedores según los modelos de IA disponibles, no solo por precio o estabilidad. Con Microsoft vinculado a OpenAI, Anthropic se convirtió en el único activo estratégico disponible para Google y Amazon. Su ingreso anual recurrente (ARR) alcanzó 30.000 millones de dólares, confirmando su posición en el mercado empresarial. Pero hay riesgos: Anthropic podría perder independencia al tener dos competidores como accionistas, su narrativa de seguridad se ve presionada tras controversias con Claude Mythos, y su futura salida a bolsa plantea dudas sobre su sostenibilidad. A diferencia de EE.UU., donde predominan los modelos cerrados, China ve un camino alternativo con compañías como DeepSeek y su modelo de código abierto, aunque persisten dinámicas de cerradura entre nube y modelo. La inversión de Alibaba y Tencent en DeepSeek parece más una apuesta estratégica que un acuerdo de prepago de capacidad. En resumen, los 65.000 millones no son una apuesta por el valor de Anthropic, sino una entrada al juego de la IA para no quedarse atrás.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Google y Amazon invierten simultáneamente en un competidor: la lógica empresarial más absurda de la era de la IA se está haciendo realidad

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片