Bubblemaps trace Polymarket accounts linked to Iran strike bets

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-05Actualizado a 2026-03-05

Resumen

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps has uncovered a network of connected wallets that profited from highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli military strikes involving Iran on the prediction market Polymarket. The investigation identified multiple accounts, including one named “nothingeverhappens911,” which moved profits off-platform and was linked via a shared Binance deposit to another account called “Skoobidoobnj.” This second account reportedly earned around $100,000 from bets placed just before strikes on 13 June and 21 June 2025. Two additional connected accounts made approximately $65,000 and $10,000 from bets on a 28 February U.S. strike and a 13 June Israeli operation, respectively. In total, four accounts generated about $240,000 from these trades. These findings follow earlier reports of six wallets making $1.2 million from the 28 February strike, raising concerns about potential use of non-public information. The activity has intensified scrutiny over whether prediction markets incentivize trading on privileged geopolitical knowledge.

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps says it has identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket.

In a thread published on X, Bubblemaps said it traced funds between several Polymarket accounts that placed highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli strikes. This raises questions about whether traders may have had advance knowledge of geopolitical events.

The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million by betting that the United States would strike Iran on 28 February, with many of the positions reportedly opened only hours before the attack.

Wallet tracing links Polymarket accounts

According to Bubblemaps, a wallet identified as 0xa4eb, operating under the Polymarket username “nothingeverhappens911,” recently moved profits off the platform.

Tracing those funds led to another Polymarket account called “Skoobidoobnj,” with the connection established through a shared Binance deposit address.

The second account allegedly made about $100,000 betting “yes” shortly before two separate military developments involving Iran in 2025.

Those events included:

  • 13 June 2025: Israel launched an operation targeting Iranian assets.
  • 21 June 2025: The United States reportedly joined the conflict with strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow.

Bubblemaps said the on-chain links suggest the accounts may be part of a broader cluster of traders using connected wallets.

Additional accounts identified

The analytics firm said the Polymarket account “Skoobidoobnj” is also linked on-chain to two additional accounts suspected of placing trades at similarly timed intervals.

According to Bubblemaps:

  • One account allegedly earned about $65,000 betting on a U.S. strike on 28 February.
  • Another reportedly made around $10,000 on predictions related to the 13 June Israeli strike.

In total, the firm said four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Earlier $1.2M betting activity raised scrutiny

The latest findings build on the earlier discovery that six recently funded wallets made roughly $1.2 million from the 28 February U.S. strike market.

Many of those wallets were reportedly funded within 24 hours of the event. They placed bets specifically on a strike occurring on that date.

The timing of the trades drew scrutiny from analysts and policymakers, with critics suggesting the activity could indicate traders acting on privileged information.

Prediction markets face growing attention

Crypto-based prediction platforms such as Polymarket allow users to trade on the likelihood of real-world events ranging from elections to geopolitical conflicts.

While supporters argue that prediction markets can aggregate information efficiently, critics warn that they may create incentives for trading on sensitive or nonpublic information.

The Bubblemaps findings add to the ongoing debate over whether blockchain analytics could help identify suspicious trading behavior in decentralized prediction markets.


Final Summary

  • Bubblemaps says on-chain tracing linked several Polymarket accounts that profited from betting on U.S. and Israeli strikes involving Iran.
  • The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets earned about $1.2M from bets predicting a 28 February U.S. strike on Iran.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps identify regarding Polymarket accounts and bets on military strikes involving Iran?

ABubblemaps identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket, with some accounts placing highly accurate bets shortly before the events.

QHow much did the six wallets collectively earn from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, and what was notable about the timing of their bets?

AThe six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, with many positions opened only hours before the attack.

QWhich Polymarket username was associated with wallet 0xa4eb, and how was it linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj'?

AWallet 0xa4eb operated under the Polymarket username 'nothingeverhappens911' and was linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj' through a shared Binance deposit address.

QWhat were the two military events in June 2025 that the account 'Skoobidoobnj' reportedly bet on, and how much profit did it make?

AThe account 'Skoobidoobnj' bet on an Israeli operation targeting Iranian assets on 13 June 2025 and U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow on 21 June 2025, making about $100,000 in profit.

QWhat is the total amount that the four connected Polymarket accounts generated from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran?

AThe four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La transformación de Ethena y la ansiedad de Wall Street

En junio de 2026, el protocolo de moneda estable Ethena anunció una colaboración estratégica con el gigante de gestión de activos Janus Henderson (480.000 millones USD en AUM). Este acuerdo, que abarca inversión estratégica, gestión de tesorería y desarrollo de productos cotizados (ETPs), marca una transformación profunda para Ethena y refleja la creciente integración entre las finanzas tradicionales (TradFi) y las finanzas descentralizadas (DeFi). Ethena, conocido por su stablecoin USDe respaldada por una estrategia delta-neutral, se vio forzado a evolucionar tras una crisis en 2025 que expuso la dependencia de su modelo a las tasas de financiación de los contratos perpetuos. Su respuesta fue diversificar radicalmente las reservas de USDe, reduciendo la exposición a derivados al 20% e incorporando activos del mundo real (RWA) como fondos del Tesoro estadounidense, bonos corporativos y, ahora, fondos de CLO (obligaciones de préstamo garantizadas) de alto grado a través de Janus Henderson. La colaboración tiene cuatro capas clave: 1) Janus Henderson proporciona activos (su fondo JAAA de CLO) para las reservas de USDe; 2) Su plataforma ANTIK adquiere tokens de gobernanza ENA; 3) Integra sUSDe en sus herramientas de gestión de tesorería; 4) Ambos planean desarrollar productos ETP para distribuir USDe y ENA a clientes institucionales. Este movimiento de un gestor de activos tradicional actuando como canal de distribución para un protocolo DeFi surge de una ansiedad estructural en Wall Street. La claridad regulatoria, como la Ley GENIUS de EE.UU. de 2025, ha transformado la competencia en el sector de las stablecoins, donde actores como PayPal y BlackRock ya están establecidos. Para los gestores tradicionales, no participar implica riesgos mayores: perder el control sobre la "tokenización" de activos, enfrentar presiones por mayores rendimientos para sus clientes y, fundamentalmente, quedarse fuera del control de los puntos de entrada en la capa de liquidación de la economía digital, donde las stablecoins ya manejan volúmenes que superan a los de Visa. La evolución de Ethena, de ser un producto puramente criptonativo a un instrumento híbrido con RWA, y la decisión de Janus Henderson de integrarse profundamente en su ecosistema, señalan la disolución de los límites entre TradFi y DeFi. La moneda estable se ha convertido en el campo de batalla central para esta fusión, donde la colaboración estratégica supera a la confrontación.

Foresight NewsHace 14 min(s)

La transformación de Ethena y la ansiedad de Wall Street

Foresight NewsHace 14 min(s)

MoneyGram: ¿Por qué lanzamos nuestra propia stablecoin?

**MoneyGram lanza su propia stablecoin, MGUSD, para transformar los servicios financieros globales** Con más de 80 años en el sector de las remesas, MoneyGram introduce MGUSD, una stablecoin propia, no como un producto aislado sino como una pieza central de su estrategia para ofrecer servicios financieros más amplios y eficientes. Dirigida a los miles de millones de personas con acceso limitado a servicios bancarios, MGUSD permite a los usuarios mantener un saldo estable en dólares dentro de la app de MoneyGram. Esta innovación, desarrollada en la blockchain de Stellar con una arquitectura de cartera auto-custodiada, ofrece mayor control sobre los fondos. Los usuarios pueden almacenar valor, recibir transferencias globales, cambiar divisas y acceder a una red masiva de retiro de efectivo, todo desde una única plataforma. La tecnología blockchain opera de forma transparente para el usuario, centrándose en la utilidad práctica. A diferencia de otras stablecoins enfocadas en el comercio institucional, MGUSD se integra en la red existente de MoneyGram. Su valor radica en mejorar la infraestructura interna: agilizar la gestión de tesorería, reducir costos operativos y optimizar procesos de liquidación y financiación para agentes y socios, manteniendo la neutralidad entre diferentes stablecoins. La implementación rápida en aproximadamente un año fue posible gracias a una reestructuración organizativa hacia equipos multidisciplinares y ágiles. MoneyGram colabora con socios tecnológicos especializados como Stripe (emisor regulado), Crossmint (gestión de carteras), Fireblocks (tesorería empresarial), m0 (contratos inteligentes) y la Stellar Development Foundation. MoneyGram mantiene su compromiso con un ecosistema abierto, potenciando tanto la experiencia del usuario final como las capacidades de sus socios globales (bancos, billeteras digitales, agentes). El futuro de MGUSD se centra en seguir evolucionando para ofrecer un control financiero más estable, accesible y completo para poblaciones desatendidas en todo el mundo.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

MoneyGram: ¿Por qué lanzamos nuestra propia stablecoin?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片