Bitwise: This Weekend's Surge Accelerates the On-Chain Migration of the Financial World

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-05Actualizado a 2026-03-05

Resumen

Financial migration to the blockchain is inevitable, and recent geopolitical events have dramatically accelerated this shift. Traditional markets operate with delays, high costs, and limited hours, but blockchain enables 24/7 global trading, instant settlement, and lower costs. While many assumed this transition would take 5–10 years, a weekend military strike against Iran—occurring when almost all traditional markets were closed—proved a turning point. On February 28, during widespread market closures, decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid saw explosive activity. Hyperliquid’s oil perpetual contracts became a key price reference, even cited by Bloomberg. Tether’s gold token XAUT reached over $300 million in trading volume, and prediction markets like Polymarket hit record highs. For the first time, crypto markets functioned as the primary real-time financial system during a major event. This event underscores that investors, funds, and institutions can no longer ignore on-chain finance. The barrier to entry—learning wallets, stablecoins, and DeFi platforms—is diminishing as necessity drives adoption. Once engaged, users gain access to a faster, more open financial system. Critics may argue extended traditional hours could suffice, but history shows that disruptive technology, like blockchain, often outperforms incremental improvements. The move to on-chain finance is happening faster than anyone expected.

I have always believed that the migration of the financial industry to on-chain is inevitable.

Blockchain enables assets to be traded 24/7, 365 days a year, with instant settlement and costs far lower than the traditional system. It makes traditional stock trading platforms and T+1 settlement seem incredibly antiquated.

But I've always wondered: When exactly will this transition happen? And what event will catalyze the system's complete transformation?

After all, most people don't feel the delays of the current system. When my uncle buys stocks in his Charles Schwab account, he doesn't care that it takes a day to settle, nor does he care about the complex processes involving mysterious institutions like the NSCC, DTCC, and Cede & Co. He buys, the stock appears in his account, simple and straightforward, no fuss.

So I once thought that crypto-driven markets would grow on the fringes first. Over the next 5 to 10 years, they would primarily serve crypto-native users and those who don't fit perfectly into the traditional financial system, like global retail investors wanting to trade U.S. stocks. Eventually, these systems would become good enough to gradually take over the existing system, and institutions like the NYSE would transition to tokenized markets, much like they moved from floor trading to electronic trading.

This would be a classic tech story: disrupt the edges first, then take over the core. I thought this would take 5 to 10 years.

But this weekend proved me wrong. I am now convinced that this will happen much faster than anyone anticipated.

What Happened This Weekend

At 2:30 AM EST on Sunday, February 28th, Trump announced a strike against Iran. This timing is very specific for global financial markets; almost all markets were closed.


· U.S. stock markets were closed
· U.S. futures markets were closed
· Major forex markets were closed
· European markets were closed
· Asian markets were closed

Essentially, the only markets still trading were those in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Middle Eastern countries (which operate on a Sunday-to-Thursday schedule), but these markets are limited in size and scope, with little participation from Western investors and covering few assets.

In the past, if a major geopolitical shock occurred on a Sunday morning, investors would have had to wait until 6:00 PM Sunday evening for U.S. futures to open to see the market's reaction. But this weekend showed us: they now have another choice—turning to the 24/7, globally traded crypto infrastructure.

And this weekend, they actually did it.

Throughout Sunday, on-chain finance became the core of global finance. The decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, in particular, was the focal point. It offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets as well as real-world assets like crude oil.

Hyperliquid's trading volume surged so much that Bloomberg, in its coverage of the airstrike's impact on oil, directly cited the price of the crude oil contract on Hyperliquid as the most significant reference price. This was no coincidence; Hyperliquid's native token, HYPE, rose about 30% over the weekend. In my view, this is more like investors paying upfront for its future.

But it wasn't just Hyperliquid. The trading volume for XAUT, a gold token issued by Tether, soared to over $300 million in 24 hours. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket hit record trading volumes. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets were also in the spotlight.

In my memory, this is the first time the cryptocurrency market has truly functioned as a "market" in the real sense.

Why This Matters

If you are a hedge fund, a bank, or any investor who wants to stay competitive, you now have no choice: you must open a stablecoin wallet, you must learn to trade on Hyperliquid, you must understand XAUT, you must research tokenized stocks.

Because even if you don't, someone else will.

This trend will accelerate. The biggest barrier to participating in on-chain markets is getting used to tools like wallets, stablecoins, Hyperliquid, and Uniswap. Once you get the hang of it, all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance are within reach. Exposure leads to exploration, and exploration leads to trading.

Of course, some will surely say: Traditional markets can do this too! Nasdaq is moving towards 23-hour trading, 5 days a week! We don't offer 24/7 trading because no one needs it!

Fine, whatever. That's what Blockbuster said about Netflix, and what Microsoft said about the iPhone.

The shift to on-chain finance is inevitable. And after this weekend, I am certain: its arrival will be much sooner than any of us imagined.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what event over the weekend accelerated the migration of the financial world on-chain?

AThe announcement of a U.S. military strike on Iran in the early hours of Sunday, February 28th, a time when almost all traditional global financial markets were closed.

QWhich on-chain platform became a focal point for trading during the weekend's market closure and was even cited by Bloomberg?

AThe decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, which offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets and real-world assets like crude oil.

QWhat is the author's view on the traditional argument that 24/7 trading is unnecessary?

AThe author dismisses this argument, comparing it to past dismissals of disruptive technologies like Netflix by Blockbuster and the iPhone by Microsoft, and believes the shift to on-chain finance is inevitable and will happen sooner than expected.

QWhat specific asset, issued by Tether, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge to over $300 million during this event?

ATether's gold token, XAUT.

QWhat does the author identify as the biggest hurdle for participating in on-chain markets, and what is the consequence of overcoming it?

AThe biggest hurdle is getting accustomed to the tools like wallets, stablecoins, and platforms like Hyperliquid and Uniswap. Once this is overcome, it leads to exploration and, subsequently, more trading activity as all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance become accessible.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Acciones A malheridas injustamente: Resiliencia, expectativas y confianza

En julio, las acciones tecnológicas globales se debilitaron repentinamente, afectando a mercados como Corea del Sur, Estados Unidos y Japón, lo que también presionó a los sectores tecnológicos de A-shares, con caídas consecutivas en el índice STAR 50 y el índice ChiNext. Sin embargo, este ajuste refleja principalmente la transmisión de riesgos externos, como la reducción del apalancamiento en las acciones coreanas, y no un cambio en los fundamentos. El mercado tecnológico chino es más diversificado que el de Corea del Sur, con narrativas duales: la cadena de suministro global de IA y la sustitución de importaciones en infraestructura de computación nacional. Los datos de ganancias en sectores clave como módulos ópticos y cables de fibra óptica siguen siendo sólidos, respaldando la lógica subyacente de la industria. Ante la volatilidad, el "equipo nacional" (fondos estatales) ha intervenido activamente, con anuncios de inversiones y recompras por cientos de miles de millones de yuanes por parte de empresas estatales, aseguradoras y casas de bolsa. Esto estabiliza la liquidez y las expectativas del mercado, enviando una señal de soporte político. Históricamente, estas intervenciones han coincidido con niveles de piso en el mercado. Más allá de la tecnología, otros sectores claves muestran fortaleza interna. El consumo se beneficia de una inflación al alza (IPC estable por encima del 1%) y signos de recuperación en sectores como el licor, con mejoras en inventarios. Los ciclos, liderados por el aluminio, tienen perspectivas de aumento de precios debido al equilibrio ajustado entre oferta y demanda global, altas ganancias y bajas valoraciones. Los activos financieros, como la banca, ofrecen dividendos estables. En resumen, la corrección tecnológica es un evento impulsado por factores externos. Con la acción estabilizadora del "equipo nacional" y la resiliencia de múltiples sectores (consumo, ciclos, finanzas), que cuentan con fundamentos sólidos y potencial de recuperación, se espera que el mercado de A-shares recupere su estabilidad.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Acciones A malheridas injustamente: Resiliencia, expectativas y confianza

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Aún no llega la computadora cuántica, pero ya es un problema el 1,1 millón de bitcoins de Satoshi Nakamoto

Un problema de 1,1 millones de bitcoins de Satoshi surge antes de que lleguen los ordenadores cuánticos. Una herramienta de prueba de conocimiento cero permite migrar fondos de carteras modernas antes de un ataque cuántico, en tan solo 243 ms. Sin embargo, los antiguos bitcoins extraídos antes de 2012, incluidos aproximadamente 1,1 millones de BTC pertenecientes a Satoshi Nakamoto almacenados en direcciones P2PK, no pueden ser rescatados con esta técnica. Estas direcciones antiguas carecen de una ruta de derivación jerárquica (HD), lo que las hace criptográficamente inaccesibles para la solución. Esto plantea un dilema político, no técnico, para la comunidad Bitcoin. Se discuten cuatro opciones, todas problemáticas: 1) No actuar y permitir el robo, desestabilizando el mercado; 2) Congelar coercitivamente los fondos (como sugiere la propuesta BIP-361), violando el principio de propiedad; 3) Limitar severamente los retiros de direcciones vulnerables para ralentizar una venta masiva; o 4) Redistribuir forzosamente los fondos "abandonados" mediante un hard fork, rompiendo la inmutabilidad del libro mayor. El mercado ya está reaccionando a esta incertidumbre de gobernanza. Instituciones como Jefferies han reducido su exposición a Bitcoin citando este riesgo, a pesar de que los ordenadores cuánticos prácticos aún no existen. El verdadero peligro inmediato no es el hardware cuántico, sino la crisis de fe dentro de la comunidad sobre cómo proteger el valor de Bitcoin sin traicionar sus principios fundamentales de propiedad y código inquebrantable.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Aún no llega la computadora cuántica, pero ya es un problema el 1,1 millón de bitcoins de Satoshi Nakamoto

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

¿Dónde está el campo de batalla principal del próximo mercado alcista? La respuesta se esconde en estos dos tipos de activos

**¿Cuál será el foco de la próxima carrera alcista en criptomonedas? La respuesta está en estos dos tipos de activos.** El mercado de criptomonedas muestra signos de tocar fondo, con Bitcoin subiendo y fondos ETF entrando nuevamente. La narrativa central del próximo ciclo alcista será la **convergencia de las finanzas tradicionales y las finanzas en cadena (on-chain)**, impulsada por casos de uso reales como stablecoins, tokenización de activos, operaciones 24/7 y liquidación instantánea. Esta convergencia crea oportunidades de inversión en dos frentes: 1. **Aplicaciones nativas de criptofinanzas con ingresos reales**: Como **Hyperliquid (HYPE)**, una cadena de derivados cuyo volumen incluye ya activos tradicionales. Su ventaja reside en un modelo de negocio sostenible (con ingresos recurrentes) y una economía de token sólida, donde el 99% de los ingresos se usa para recomprar y quemar HYPE. 2. **Empresas tradicionales maduras que adoptan infraestructura cripto**: Ejemplificado por **Robinhood (HOOD)**, que acaba de lanzar su propia blockchain (Robinhood Chain) para operar con acciones tokenizadas y DeFi en 120 países. Su escala y compromiso real le dan una ventaja significativa sobre los meros proyectos piloto. En resumen, los mayores ganadores de la próxima fase serán aquellos proyectos y empresas que estén impulsando activamente la fusión de ambos mundos, aprovechando las ventajas de la tecnología blockchain para transformar los mercados financieros globales.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

¿Dónde está el campo de batalla principal del próximo mercado alcista? La respuesta se esconde en estos dos tipos de activos

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片