US Banking Lobby Considers Lawsuit Over OCC Crypto Charters

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-10Actualizado a 2026-03-10

Resumen

A US banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for granting national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency companies like Ripple, BitGo, and Paxos. The BPI argues that these charters, which allow crypto firms to operate as trust banks and provide custody services, could pose risks to Americans and the financial system. They claim this move blurs the definition of a "bank," increases systemic risk, and undermines the credibility of national banking charters. The BPI had previously urged the OCC to reject such applications, and while no final decision on a lawsuit has been made, the group has a history of taking legal action against the agency. Similar concerns were echoed by the Independent Community Bankers of America.

A banking lobby group hailing from the US is looking to take legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over the agency permitting national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

An unknown source close to the lobby’s thinking has informed The Guardian that the Bank Policy Institute has plans to sue the OCC for avoiding previous warnings from banking groups and state regulators and proceeding with its revisionism of federal licensing rules to permit national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

As per the group, this could probably put Americans and the financial system at stake. Under Jonathan Gould’s leadership, the OCC permitted the first batch of conditional national trust bank charter approvals to crypto companies comprising Ripple, BitGo and Paxos, among others. Since that time, various companies have demanded similar approvals.

Hanging Sword on OCC

Once permitted, the National Trust Bank charter will grant these firms the ability to function as trust banks and provide custody and asset safekeeping services. In October, the BPI stated it was requesting the OCC to decline applications from crypto companies, comprising Ripple and Circle, as it claimed that permitting such charters could lead to risk to the financial system.

It also mentions that BPI alerts that approving this route and permitting companies to pick a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like products could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a “bank”, heighten systemic risk and highlight the credibility of the national banking charter itself.

As per The Guardian, the BPI hasn’t decided yet if it plans to pursue legal action against the OCC. Although the report mentioned that the BPI was among a group of banks that had so far taken legal action against the OCC.

The Independent Community Bankers of America issued similar warnings over the OCC’s crypto charter approvals. Lately, the ICBA requested the OCC to pull or change its proposal for issuing licences to crypto companies. ‘

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Jumps 9%: Can the $40 Zone Be Reached and Anchor the Bull Run?

TagsLawsuitoccUSA

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the US banking lobby group is considering legal action against the OCC?

AThe banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action because the OCC is granting national trust bank charters to crypto companies, which they believe avoids previous warnings and could put Americans and the financial system at risk.

QWhich companies were among the first to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC?

ARipple, BitGo, and Paxos were among the first crypto companies to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC under Jonathan Gould's leadership.

QWhat specific concerns does the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) have about granting these charters to crypto firms?

AThe BPI is concerned that granting these charters could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a 'bank', heighten systemic risk, and undermine the credibility of the national banking charter itself by allowing companies to operate with a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like services.

QHas the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) definitively decided to sue the OCC at this time?

ANo, as per the article, the BPI hasn't yet decided if it will pursue legal action against the OCC, though it has taken such action against the agency in the past.

QWhich other banking group has issued similar warnings to the OCC regarding crypto charters?

AThe Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) has also issued similar warnings and recently requested the OCC to withdraw or change its proposal for issuing licenses to crypto companies.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Las 4 verdades y la trampa de comisiones detrás de los incentivos para market makers de liquidez (LP) de Polymarket

Resumen: Polymarket ha lanzado un programa de incentivos para proveedores de liquidez (LP) que ha generado opiniones divididas. Por un lado, se presenta como una solución para mejorar la liquidez en los mercados de predicción, recompensando a los usuarios que colocan órdenes limitadas y mantienen profundidad en el libro de órdenes. El sistema incluye tarifas para los "takers" en mercados específicos (Crypto, NCAAB, Serie A) y tres tipos de incentivos: recompensas por ejecución de órdenes limitadas, incentivos por liquidez en órdenes en reposo y patrocinios comunitarios. Los defensores argumentan que estas métricas (tarifas pagadas y recompensas obtenidas) podrían ser un fuerte indicador anti-sybil para una potencial distribución de tokens POLY, premiando la contribución real a la liquidez. Por otro lado, los críticos argumentan que el programa es esencialmente una "trampa" donde los LP en realidad operan con pérdidas, enmascaradas por las recompensas, confiando en que un airdrop futuro cubra sus déficits. Señalan que los market makers profesionales evitan el mercado debido al riesgo de información privilegiada y que el modelo de subsidio diario de millones de dólares para mantener la liquidez es insostenible a largo plazo, lo que podría llevar a tarifas generalizadas que eliminarían la ventaja clave de Polymarket sobre las casas de apuestas tradicionales. Se sugieren soluciones alternativas como tarifas fijas sobre ganancias, pools de liquidez nativos con POLY o tarifas en productos extendidos.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Las 4 verdades y la trampa de comisiones detrás de los incentivos para market makers de liquidez (LP) de Polymarket

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Las 4 verdades y la trampa de comisiones detrás de los incentivos de market making de Polymarket LP

Resumen: Polymarket ha introducido recientemente un nuevo sistema de tarifas e incentivos para proveedores de liquidez (LP) en su plataforma global. Aunque la mayoría de los mercados siguen siendo gratuitos, ahora se aplica una tarifa a las órdenes "taker" en mercados específicos de cripto y eventos deportivos. Este cambio busca financiar programas de recompensas para LPs que proporcionen liquidez a través de órdenes limitadas. El sistema incluye dos tipos principales de incentivos: recompensas por ejecución de órdenes limitadas (solo para órdenes ejecutadas) e incentivos de liquidez (por mantener órdenes en el libro, incluso sin ejecutar). Un tercer mecanismo permite a los usuarios patrocinar directamente la liquidez de un mercado. Un análisis positivo argumenta que estas métricas (tarifas pagadas y recompensas ganadas) podrían ser un fuerte indicador anti-Sybil para una potencial distribución de tokens POLY, ya que premian la provisión de liquidez de valor real en lugar del simple volumen de transacciones. Una perspectiva crítica advierte que ser LP puede ser inherentemente no rentable debido al "desgaste" de la liquidez, y que los incentivos actuales dependen de subsidios insostenibles de la plataforma. Sugiere que Polymarket debería gravar a los bots arbitrajistas, implementar grupos de liquidez nativos con POLY o cobrar por productos extendidos en lugar de afectar la experiencia central de apuestas sin comisiones.

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Las 4 verdades y la trampa de comisiones detrás de los incentivos de market making de Polymarket LP

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片