Lower costs, higher speeds after Ethereum’s Merge? Don’t count on it

CointelegraphPublicado a 2022-08-26Actualizado a 2022-08-29

Resumen

As we approach the date of Ethereum’s Merge, users have speculated about what it will mean for projects and the wider ecosystem.

As we approach the date of Ethereum’s Merge, users have speculated about what it will mean for projects and the wider ecosystem. Some argue the Merge will have little impact on gas fees and believe transaction speeds might improve.
However, in general, most ordinary users will not notice much change. The real changes for average users will only be seen after the sharding mechanism is introduced six months later.
The Merge will reduce energy consumption and increase security
The Merge is a planned update to the Ethereum network scheduled for Sept. 15. It will move transaction validation from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS). PoS has been part of Ethereum’s plans for many years, but the level of technical sophistication it requires has taken time to develop. It means a transition from miners being responsible for validating blocks to the staked owners of ETH.
This will have several major significant long-term consequences. Firstly, it will mean a huge reduction in the amount of electricity used by Ethereum (as much as 99.9%). While PoW is a highly effective means of validation, it has been shown to use the same amounts of electricity as whole countries, meaning it is highly detrimental to the environment.
Under PoS, validators will only need to stake 32 Ether (ETH). The switch will also mean an increase in security. This is because it decreases the danger of a 51% attack (required to take over the network), which is more likely on a PoW system. On a PoS system, the risk of launching an attack is the staked ETH — as opposed to electricity cost on PoW — so there is an inherent penalty for failure.
Whereas a failed PoW attack results in the loss of electricity costs, slashing a validator’s stake is the PoS equivalent of a miner burning down an entire PoW server farm in a failed attack. The economic incentive reduces significantly. The Merge will also ultimately level the playing field economically.
Don’t expect better speed or lower gas fees
Despite the fact that, at the moment, the Merge does not require huge amounts of action from the projects themselves. However, there is still the question of how the Merge will affect the users of the projects.
Many users hold certain assumptions and guesses about how the system will change after the Merge. But in fact, many of those assumptions are wrong.
Little impact on gas fees
The Ethereum Foundation, the organization behind the Ethereum blockchain, has asserted the Merge will have little impact on gas fees. This means that gas fees will remain relatively high, depending on the demand and supply of computation power.

Ethereum average transaction fee YTD. Source: BitInfoChartsImproved speed
The claim that transaction speeds will be improved has been repeatedly denied by Ethereum core developers. They argue that it depends on the app that utilizes the blockchain and not the chain itself.
High NFT fees
To create a new nonfungible token (NFT) on the Ethereum network, you’ll have to pay a transaction fee. However, the switch from Ethereum’s current PoW consensus algorithm to its upcoming PoS system won’t affect NFT minting fees.
Rewards from staking
Those who have staked their crypto will find that the rewards will remain locked. These will be locked until the Shanghai upgrade, which is the next major upgrade following the Merge. When this happens, new ETH will accumulate on the Beacon Chain and remain locked for at least six to 12 months.
In general, ordinary users won’t notice much change, but there are a few points to consider.
The price of ETH is likely to rise
It is expected that the price of ETH will rise immediately after the Merge, in part due to projection as a result of Goerli’s success and a potential system of hedging exposure. But the idea that ETH fees will be burned as a result is simply a myth. Instead, unburned fees and execution-level tips will be sent to stakers. Validators will receive 30% of transaction fees.
Commissions will stay the same, and withdrawals won’t be instantly possible
There has been much talk about how the Merge will change commissions, fees and withdrawals. However, these things are unlikely to occur before the next phase of the network’s transformation. Many of those benefits will come when Ethereum proceeds to the next update step of sharding. It is then that commissions are likely to lower. Similarly, it is at this point that users will be able to withdraw merged ETH (a matter that has received significant speculation).
Becoming a validator may incur bugs or non-synchronization of the blockchain
For users who wish to become validators, there is the possibility of bugs and non-synchronization of the blockchain. The best thing to do is to take care of updating clients and look for specific risks pertinent to the changes in consensus. But most aspects will occur automatically.

What does “being ready” for the Merge look like?
Although the Merge has been designed to have minimal impact on smart contract and decentralized application developers, there are a few small things devs may want to be aware of. Basically, the Merge comes with changes to consensus, which also includes changes related to:

  • Block structure
  • Slot/block timing
  • Opcode changes
  • Sources of on-chain randomness
  • Concept of safe head
  • Finalized blocks.

Therefore, if your app or service relies on reading the block structure, you will need to update it. Any app that reads the state of the blockchain, like a centralized exchange, must update its nodes. The “readiness” of the project for the Merge actually means the changes that will occur during the Merge should not affect the clients of the project in any way. Still, the specifics of each project are unique. If the process goes smoothly, decentralized apps and services should not be affected, although Ethereum has never gone through a comparable update in the past.
The next phase of the process
Users will start to see significant change after upgrades scheduled to take palace after the Merge, most notably the Shanghai hard fork, which will enable the withdrawal of staked funds and increase scalability. And in 2023, the sharding mechanism will be deployed. Sharding will increase Ethereum’s bandwidth even further, in addition to likely reducing network costs.
The Merge holds huge promise for the future, but it is one step in a long process. Users need to understand that to reap the benefits and be prepared.
Svyatoslav Dorofeev is the CEO of TheWatch and is a crypto enthusiast with more than 15 years in product development. He launched and led products in multiple areas, including OTT/IPTV, gaming, travel (OTT), e-commerce and fintech. He was formerly the chief product owner at one of the largest banks in Eastern Europe.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El Trilema de la Escalabilidad es un Falso Problema

Autor: Billy Gao Traducción: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher El sistema criptográfico más potente de la historia no puede proteger la privacidad de tus fondos. Cada transacción y cada posición se emiten públicamente en la cadena de bloques. La cadena de bloques es esencialmente una computadora compartida, lenta, costosa y sin propietario. Su principal ventaja es que nadie puede evitar que la uses ni engañarte sobre los resultados. La "trilema" tradicional —descentralización, escalabilidad, seguridad— ha sido en gran medida superada, pero no es el principal obstáculo. El problema real son dos defectos de diseño: la legitimidad y la falta de privacidad. La transparencia total en las cadenas públicas no es una característica positiva, es un impuesto que se paga en forma de MEV, front-running y exposición financiera. Los fondos (como las monedas estables) son el caso de uso ideal para la cadena, ya que el registro en el libro mayor es el activo en sí mismo. Sin embargo, el capital institucional y los grandes patrimonios no participan porque no exponen públicamente sus balances. La legitimidad está mejorando con marcos regulatorios, pero la privacidad sigue siendo la gran barrera. La privacidad con cumplimiento normativo demostrable, basada en pruebas criptográficas de conocimiento cero, es la solución. Permite verificar hechos (solvencia, KYC) sin revelar datos subyacentes, combinando privacidad y transparencia necesaria. Esto representa una mejora pura respecto al modelo actual y es el puente para atraer billones en capital hacia la cadena.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

El Trilema de la Escalabilidad es un Falso Problema

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Las stablecoins finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Un análisis detallado del reaseguro en cadena Re | Diálogo con el fundador de Re, Karan Saroya

Establemente las monedas finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Re, una plataforma de reaseguro en cadena, absorbe monedas estables de DeFi y las utiliza como garantía para respaldar a aseguradoras estadounidenses, devolviendo las primas obtenidas a los depositantes en cadena. Actualmente respalda a 35 aseguradoras, con un negocio suscrito de 5 mil millones de dólares, y planea superar los 10 mil millones en siete meses. **Puntos clave:** 1. **Fuente de rendimiento real:** Ofrece a los tenedores de monedas estables un rendimiento anual del 12%-14% o más, proveniente del mercado de reaseguro (un billón de dólares), no correlacionado con los mercados tradicionales. 2. **Eficiencia operativa:** Los contratos inteligentes reemplazan los costosos procesos tradicionales de captación de capital, permitiendo a un equipo pequeño competir con gigantes del sector. 3. **Apalancamiento regulatorio:** Por cada 1 dólar de garantía, se pueden respaldar 5-7 dólares en primas, multiplicando los rendimientos. 4. **Integración con DeFi:** Los depositantes reciben un token que puede reutilizarse en protocolos como Morpho para aumentar aún más el rendimiento. 5. **Token de gobernanza RE:** Inspirado en Lloyd's of London, permite a los poseedores gobernar la dirección del capital y los parámetros del sistema. Re representa un punto de inflexión, conectando el capital en cadena con la economía real y proporcionando la demanda necesaria para la infraestructura DeFi existente. Su arquitectura combina un frente regulado con un backend descentralizado eficiente.

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

Las stablecoins finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Un análisis detallado del reaseguro en cadena Re | Diálogo con el fundador de Re, Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

¿1996 o 1999? La primera prueba de Walsh es 'cómo ver la IA'

El nuevo presidente de la Reserva Federal, Wash, enfrenta su primera gran prueba: determinar si el auge actual de la IA se asemeja más al escenario económico de 1996 o al de 1999. Esta decisión definirá la política monetaria y su legado. Por un lado, está la visión optimista, que asemeja a 1996, donde un crecimiento impulsado por ganancias de productividad permitiría a la Fed mantenerse paciente mientras la inflación retrocede. Wash ha mostrado simpatía por esta narrativa, advirtiendo contra el error de sofocar prematuramente un boom de productividad. Por otro lado, la visión cautelosa, similar a 1999, sostiene que la demanda ya se está calentando y esperar datos concluyentes de productividad podría forzar subidas de tasas más agresivas después. Chicago Fed's Goolsbee argumenta que, al ser un boom ampliamente anticipado, la IA podría inflar la demanda antes de materializar la oferta, presionando la inflación. Wash opera en un contexto más difícil que el de Greenspan en los 90, con presión arancelaria, alto déficit fiscal y menos ventajas globales. Un dilema adicional es su deseo de eliminar la "guía anticipada" de la Fed, un mecanismo creado precisamente en 1999 para gestionar expectativas. Si la economía se recalienta, podría verse forzado a usarlo o arriesgar volatilidad en los mercados. La respuesta a la pregunta central —¿1996 o 1999?— resolverá este y otros dilemas.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

¿1996 o 1999? La primera prueba de Walsh es 'cómo ver la IA'

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片