UK Considers Expanding Treasury Bills After FCA Admits ‘Major Firm’ Into Stablecoin Sandbox

ccn.comPublicado a 2025-11-28Actualizado a 2025-11-28

Key Takeaways
  • The U.K. government will consult on changes expanding the market for Treasury bills.
  • Compared to its peers, the U.K. government debt has much longer average maturities.
  • A “major firm” will test a GBP stablecoin in the FCA’s regulatory sandbox.

In the United States, stablecoins have already driven a noticeable increase in demand for Treasury bills.

Now, as regulators in the U.K. anticipate a wave of GBP-denominated stablecoins, the government is considering expanding its own T-bill market.

Top Crypto Tax Accounting Software
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Stablecoins and Government Debt

To ensure they remain liquid enough to fund redemptions, stablecoin issuers fill their reserves with short-dated Treasury securities—mostly T-bills with less than three months to maturity and overnight repurchase agreements.

Speaking on Nov. 12, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the stablecoin market could “grow tenfold” by the end of the decade. As it does, “so too will the demand for Treasury bills.”

He acknowledged that evolving demand would require adjusting what kinds of debt the Treasury issues, implying a shift toward more bills versus notes and bonds.

U.K. Government Explores Debt Adjustment

Compared to the U.S. and other comparable economies, the U.K.’s government debt is skewed toward long-dated gilts.

As noted in the U.K.’s Autumn Budget, published on Wednesday, the country has the longest average debt maturity among the G7—approximately seven years.

However, with demand for 30–50-year gilts already waning due to structural changes in pensions and banking, the government acknowledged that annual tweaks to its issuance schedule may no longer be sufficient.

To address this, it will launch a consultation on “expanding and deepening the Treasury bill market” in January.

‘Major Firm’ Admitted Into FCA Sandbox

The government’s proposal to adjust debt issuance is framed as a resilience measure, with the Treasury committed to maintaining “as diversified an investor base as possible.”

Currently, there are only a handful of unregulated GBP stablecoins with a combined market capitalization of a few million.

However, regulators are preparing for a wave of adoption that could see stablecoin issuers emerge as top buyers of government debt.

With the Bank of England expected to finalize its stablecoin regime in 2026, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will run a dedicated stablecoin cohort in its regulatory sandbox.

Announcing the news on Wednesday, David Geale, executive director for digital finance at the Payment Systems Regulator, said a “major firm” had already been accepted into the sandbox to test a GBP stablecoin.

The British situation is starkly different from the U.S., where USD-pegged coins had already grown large enough to influence the Treasury market by the time Congress passed the Genius Act.

Yet, the country also requires more drastic changes to the mix of debt if it is to modernize a market that is currently ill-suited for digital-asset liquidity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Aave se va, el TVL se desploma, ¿dónde está el ancla de valoración de MegaETH?

**Resumen en español:** Según datos de DefiLlama, el TVL (valor total bloqueado) de MegaETH experimentó una fuerte volatilidad del 9 al 10 de julio, cayendo cerca del 60% en 24 horas y evaporando aproximadamente el 70% desde su pico en mayo. El protocolo principal Aave V3 retiró el 80% de su liquidez. El precio de MEGA cayó a alrededor de $0.048, con una capitalización de mercado de unos $54 millones y un FDV (valor totalmente diluido) de unos $4.8 mil millones. Una vez considerada una de las nuevas cadenas más prometedoras, MegaETH alcanzó un TVL de $245 millones en mayo. Sin embargo, su ecosistema dependía en gran medida de un solo protocolo (Aave) y de estrategias de aprovechamiento cíclicas con stablecoins como USDe. Cuando los rendimientos de estas estrategias disminuyeron, los fondos se retiraron rápidamente, revelando una discrepancia entre la valoración y los fundamentos reales de la cadena. Existen tres desajustes clave: 1. **Valoración vs. Uso real:** El FDV de $4.7 mil millones contrasta con unos ingresos protocolarios anualizados de solo ~$10 millones y unas 2,600 direcciones activas diarias. 2. **Narrativa vs. Calidad del ecosistema:** A pesar de su narrativa DeFi, la mayor parte de los ingresos proviene de un juego de cartas (Monster), no de protocolos financieros. El volumen de trading en DEX y contratos perpetuos es bajo. 3. **Expectativas a corto vs. largo plazo:** El TVL inicial fue impulsado por incentivos y arbitraje, no por demanda orgánica. Proyectos como Uniswap han visto evaporarse casi por completo su TVL en la cadena. La caída de MEGA refleja una tendencia más amplia en la que el mercado reduce la prima por el TVL contable y las narrativas, exigiendo en su lugar un soporte de valor más claro basado en transacciones reales, ingresos y un ecosistema sólido. Aunque la caída ya es significativa, una recuperación sostenida probablemente requerirá que el equipo transforme la liquidez a corto plazo en un uso y un desarrollo ecológico real y tangible, más allá de los posibles rebotes por sentimiento del mercado.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Aave se va, el TVL se desploma, ¿dónde está el ancla de valoración de MegaETH?

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片