Branding crisis? Polygon mulls returning to its former ‘MATIC’ name

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-11-26Actualizado a 2025-11-27

Key Takeaways 

Why is Polygon facing an identity crisis? 

Per the CEO, nearly 95% of its users are outside social media and are wondering what happened to MATIC. 

How did the community respond? 

Mixed. Some want MATIC for its stronger brand, while others warned such a move would cause more confusion. 


Ethereum L2 Polygon appears to be in a branding crisis with its new ticker POL. The community is now split on the proposal to revert to the former, well-known ‘MATIC’ ticker. 

Some critics argue that ‘POL’ stands for the L2 evolution into a new scaling era, via AggLayer. Hence, switching back would signal a lack of consistency and drive extra confusion, one user noted, adding

“Yes, recognition matters, but IMO we solve that with better education and clearer messaging, not by rolling back the identity we just established.”

The reaction followed the Polygon CEO, Sandeep Nailwal’s feedback request earlier in the week. 

Nailwal stated that those against POL branding argued that over 95% of non-Crypto Twitter members were used to MATIC and don’t know where it went. 

Mapping the change from Matic to Polygon

Others even question the point of the rebranding if it sidelines the majority of the users. 

PolygonPolygon

Source: X

The Ethereum [ETH] sidechain was formed in 2017 and hit mainnet as ‘Matic Network’ in 2020. The MATIC token was the heart of the L2, used as a gas token and securing it (since it’s a proof of stake, PoS) via staking.  

But in 2021, the chain rebranded to Polygon and only switched the token later in mid-2023, to POL.

What began as a single chain evolved to several related chains, including the interoperation layer (AggLayer), Polygon zkEVM and others. 

Hence, the new POL token was to capture the change, but it seems the rebranding hasn’t been felt across the board, according to the current divided opinions. 

Impact of the POL rebranding

According to Santiment, demand for Polygon [POL] rose steadily after the rebranding (gently rising red line) in late 2023 and early 2024.

However, it crashed sharply in H2 2024 (dip in red line) and remained negative until October 2025. 

PolygonPolygon

Source: Santiment

Put differently, a slight accumulation followed after the rebranding but crashed afterwards.

A new re-accumulation trend only began early this year and turned positive last month. Now 631 million POL tokens are outside exchanges — A bullish sign. 

But active addresses eased and stagnated in H₂, as shown by the blue shaded area. POL’s price, on the other hand, dropped by 83% from the 2024 peak of $0.75 to $0.13 amid broader market weakness. 

Overall, POL has seen great traction in 2025, and brand awareness may be resolved by more education. But price remained muted due to broader market sentiment. 

Share

Lecturas Relacionadas

El CEO de Etherealize califica los blockchains cerrados de Wall Street como una 'carrera hacia el abismo'

El cofundador y CEO de Etherealize, Vivek Raman, ha criticado en una entrevista con CoinDesk el creciente interés de Wall Street por las blockchains privadas o de acceso restringido. Raman argumenta que estas redes consorciales fragmentan la liquidez y reintroducen sistemas aislados, precisamente lo que la tecnología blockchain pretendía superar. Calificó esta nueva ola de proyectos como una "carrera hacia el abajo". Según Raman, estos circuitos cerrados no interactúan entre sí y socavan dos ventajas clave de la tecnología: la interoperabilidad y la concentración de liquidez. En su lugar, Etherealize promueve Ethereum como una capa base abierta para actores institucionales. Insiste en que la privacidad y las restricciones de acceso deben construirse sobre una infraestructura pública, en el nivel de aplicación o en soluciones de Capa 2 (L2), en lugar de crear redes privadas separadas. Comparó Ethereum con HTTP como base, y las capas adicionales con acceso restringido y privacidad, con HTTPS. Como ejemplos de esta tendencia, citó Canton Network de Digital Asset, el proyecto Arc de Circle y Tempo de Stripe, a los que se refirió como "blockchains consorciales 2.0", recordando iniciativas anteriores como R3 e Hyperledger que no lograron un desarrollo significativo desde 2016. Raman reafirmó la convicción de su empresa en la necesidad de una infraestructura global, abierta y sin permiso (permissionless) como capa fundamental.

cryptonews.ruHace 30 min(s)

El CEO de Etherealize califica los blockchains cerrados de Wall Street como una 'carrera hacia el abismo'

cryptonews.ruHace 30 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片