Market Maker Balancer Compromised: Key Facts Behind The $128 Million Hack

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-11-04Actualizado a 2025-11-04

Resumen

The decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol and market maker Balancer recently suffered a significant exploit, resulting in the loss of over...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol and market maker Balancer recently suffered a significant exploit, resulting in the loss of over $120 million in digital assets.

According to blockchain security firms, the total losses have now reached approximately $128 million, with ongoing withdrawals from the attacker’s wallet still being reported.

Details Of Balancer Attack

In a post on social media platform X (previously Twitter), Balancer acknowledged the exploit, stating that its engineering and security teams were investigating the breach with high priority. They added:

Balancer is committed to operational security, has undergone extensive auditing by top firms, and had bug bounties running for a long time to incentivize independent auditors. We are working closely with our security and legal teams to ensure user safety and are conducting a swift & thorough investigation. We’re grateful to our partners and the broader DeFi community for their support.

The company’s Chief Executive, Deddy Lavid, explained that the ongoing drain of funds likely results from compromised access control mechanisms within the protocol, which allowed the attackers to manipulate balances directly.

Market expert Adi Flips provided further insights into the exploit, detailing how the attack targeted Balancer’s V2 vaults and liquidity pools by exploiting vulnerabilities in the interactions of smart contracts. 

Preliminary investigations indicate that the exploit involved a maliciously deployed contract that manipulated vault calls during the initialization of pools. This manipulation was made possible due to improper authorization and callback handling, which allowed the attacker to circumvent existing safeguards. 

As a result, unauthorized swaps and balance manipulations occurred across interconnected pools, enabling the rapid drainage of assets within minutes.

The attack was initiated with a pivotal transaction on the Ethereum (ETH) mainnet, which directed assets to a new wallet controlled by the perpetrator. Following this, the stolen funds were consolidated, likely for laundering through mixers or bridges.

Stolen Assets Breakdown

The design of Balancer’s protocol, which allows for heavy interaction among its pools, exacerbated the impact of the exploit, according to Adi Flips’ analysis. 

He stated that similar vulnerabilities have been observed in automated market makers (AMMs) in the past, often linked to how they handle deflationary tokens or manage pool rebalancing.

Importantly, there is currently no evidence suggesting that a private key was compromised. The expert noted that this incident appears to be a pure smart contract exploit.

The breakdown of the stolen assets includes over $70 million in Ethereum, with additional losses of around $7 million from Base and Sonic combined, and approximately $2 million from other chains. 

According to ongoing investigations, the estimated total theft of the main assets, including wrapped Ethereum (WETH), staked Ethereum (wstETH), osETH, frxETH, rsETH, and rETH, is between $116 million and $128 million.

Balancer
The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap drop toward $3.51 trillion on Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Ronaldo is a seasoned crypto enthusiast with over four years of experience in the field. He is passionate about exploring the vast and dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and its practical applications for achieving economic sovereignty. Ronaldo is constantly seeking to expand his knowledge and expertise in the DeFi space, as he believes it holds tremendous potential for transforming the traditional financial landscape.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La Fundación Ethereum advierte que algunas herramientas podrían fallar con la actualización de Glamsterdam

La Fundación Ethereum (EF) ha advertido que algunas carteras, indexadores y estimadores de gas podrían dejar de funcionar debido a los cambios en el modelo de gas de la próxima actualización Glamsterdam. El equipo de Protocol DevOps de la EF indicó que cualquier herramienta que dependa de un límite máximo de gas predefinido "dejará de funcionar" y debe actualizarse. Instó a los desarrolladores a probar sus sistemas en Plataberget, una red de prueba pública que operará durante varios meses. Según el rastreador Forkcast, Plataberget se lanzó el 13 de agosto. La bifurcación Glamsterdam está programada para activarse en la red principal este jueves, antes de su despliegue en las redes de prueba Sepolia y Holesky (anteriormente Hoodi). El equipo explicó que la EIP-8037 introducirá una dimensión separada de "gas de estado" para las operaciones que crean nuevo estado. Con estos cambios, una transferencia simple de ETH a una cuenta existente seguirá costando 21,000 gas, mientras que enviar ETH a una cuenta nueva incurrirá en un cargo adicional de gas de estado. La fundación recomendó a los desarrolladores revisar el software que asume que 21,000 gas cubre todas las transferencias de ETH o utiliza solo una dimensión de gas al estimar costos de transacción. Glamsterdam también incluye la separación consagrada entre proponentes y constructores (PBS), listas de acceso a nivel de bloque y límites aumentados para los tamaños del código de contratos y de inicialización.

cointelegraphHace 36 min(s)

La Fundación Ethereum advierte que algunas herramientas podrían fallar con la actualización de Glamsterdam

cointelegraphHace 36 min(s)

De los fondos de cobertura a las oficinas familiares: ¿Quién está aumentando discretamente la exposición a HYPE a través de PURR?

El 30 de junio, Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), la compañía del tesoro de HYPE, fue incluida en los índices Russell 3000 y Russell 2000, un hito que evidencia el interés de Wall Street por el token HYPE y el ecosistema Hyperliquid. Recientes archivos 13F revelan compras o aumentos significativos de acciones de PURR por parte de importantes fondos y oficinas familiares, como: - **Duquesne Family Office** (Stanley Druckenmiller): 23 millones de USD. - **Renaissance Technologies**: 18.7 millones de USD. - **Slate Path Capital**: 21.4 millones de USD. - **Discovery Capital Management**: 10.3 millones de USD. - **Balyasny Asset Management**: 3 millones de USD. - **Wealth High Governance Capital**: 17.1 millones de USD. Además, gigantes como **Vanguard** y **Nuveen** incrementaron sus posiciones de forma pasiva tras la inclusión en los índices Russell. Estos movimientos muestran una transición: los inversores institucionales en PURR ya no son solo firmas de arbitraje de cripto, sino también fondos cuantitativos, *hedge funds* e instituciones financieras tradicionales, ampliando así la exposición indirecta a HYPE. El futuro parece prometedor con mecanismos como el próximo "AQAv2" de Hyperliquid, que podría aportar 200 millones de USD anuales para recompras de HYPE. Aunque el camino sigue siendo desafiante, muchos depositan en HYPE la expectativa de convertirse en un nuevo activo financiero global adoptado por Wall Street.

Odaily星球日报Hace 46 min(s)

De los fondos de cobertura a las oficinas familiares: ¿Quién está aumentando discretamente la exposición a HYPE a través de PURR?

Odaily星球日报Hace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片