Is Bitcoin Bull Cycle Over? This Analyst Thinks Different

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-04-08Actualizado a 2025-04-08

Resumen

The CEO at on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant has declared the end of the Bitcoin bull cycle, but this analyst has...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The CEO at on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant has declared the end of the Bitcoin bull cycle, but this analyst has provided a counterpoint.

Realized Cap Could Provide Hints About What’s Next For Bitcoin

In a post on X, CryptoQuant founder and CEO Ki Young Ju has explained why the bull cycle could be over for Bitcoin, based on the data of the Realized Cap. The “Realized Cap” refers to an on-chain capitalization model that assumes the actual value of any token in circulation is the spot price at which it was last transacted on the blockchain.

The last transaction price of any coin is nothing, but the price at which its investor purchased it, so the Realized Cap measures the sum of the cost basis of all coins in the circulating supply. In other words, the model represents the amount of capital that the holders as a whole have invested into the cryptocurrency.

The Market Cap, which simply sums up the supply at the current spot price, is in contrast to this model, indicating the value that the investors are holding in the present.

Whenever the investors buy coins, the Realized Cap goes up by the exact amount as what they bought for. The same, however, doesn’t hold true for the Market Cap. Depending on various market conditions, an increase in the Realized Cap can trigger an increase in the Market Cap that’s smaller, larger, or equal in scale.

According to the CryptoQuant founder, which of these ways the Market Cap is reacting to changes in the Realized Cap can provide bullish or bearish signals for BTC.

Bitcoin Market Cap Vs Realized Cap

The difference between the growths in the BTC Market Cap and Realized Cap | Source: @ki_young_ju on X

From the above chart, it’s visible that the growth rate difference between the Market Cap and Realized Cap has turned negative recently. This means that capital inflows aren’t able to raise the price, which is a signal that has historically coincided with bearish periods for Bitcoin.

While this could indeed suggest the bull market may be over, another analyst, James Van Straten, has provided a different perspective in an X post. Here is the chart that the analyst has shared as a counter to Young Ju, displaying the trend in the BTC Realized Cap, as well as its drawdown percentage, over the coin’s history:

Bitcoin Realized Cap Drawdown

The Realized Cap has continued to climb up in recent days | Source: @btcjvs on X

As is apparent from the chart, the Realized Cap has historically witnessed a strong drawdown during bear markets. This happens as a result of investors capitulating at lower prices than they bought at, thus repricing the supply down.

So far, the Realized Cap hasn’t seen any significant drawdowns, despite the fact that the price has plunged recently. This would imply the investors still hold a degree of confidence in Bitcoin. Not just that, the Realized Cap has in fact continued its upwards trajectory recently, a sign that capital inflows haven’t let off.

“Bear markets don’t usually start with confidence and inflows,” notes Van Straten. Only time would be able to answer for sure now whether BTC has transitioned into a bear or not.

BTC Price

Bitcoin has kicked off the new week with a crash of almost 7%, which has brought its price down to $76,500.

Bitcoin Price Chart

Looks like the price of the coin has plunged over the past day | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, CryptoQuant.com, Glassnode.com, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Los modelos masivos superan todos los exámenes, pero se alejan cada vez más del AGI: ¿qué desnuda este artículo?

"Gran Modelos Linguísticos (LLMs) han superado numerosos exámenes de referencia, pero ¿significa esto que nos acercamos a la Inteligencia Artificial General (AGI)? Un artículo reciente argumenta que en realidad nos estamos alejando, ya que carecemos de una definición clara y medible de la AGI. Frente a un vacío conceptual donde visionarios como Musk o Huang ofrecen predicciones dispares, investigadores como Bennett proponen un nuevo estándar: la AGI debe evaluarse como un 'científico artificial'. Este criterio exige tres capacidades fundamentales más allá de la mera imitación: 1) **Experimentación activa**: capacidad de interactuar autónomamente con entornos nuevos para obtener información, no solo procesar datos pasivamente. 2) **Comprensión causal**: pasar de identificar correlaciones en los datos a entender relaciones de causa-efecto, esencial para una verdadera adaptación. 3) **Balance entre exploración y explotación**: gestionar recursos limitados para buscar nuevos conocimientos mientras aplica los existentes. El artículo critica que el camino actual dominante, el 'Scale-maxing' (maximización de escala mediante datos, parámetros y potencia de cálculo), solo produce respuestas aproximadas memorizadas en los pesos del modelo, fallando en tareas fuera de su distribución de entrenamiento (por ejemplo, errores básicos en comparación de números). La verdadera AGI, según Bennett, requerirá una convergencia de múltiples enfoques metodológicos, no solo la ampliación de modelos. En definitiva, el futuro de la AGI no debe medirse por su habilidad para aprobar exámenes humanos, sino por su capacidad para descubrir nuevo conocimiento de forma autónoma, adaptativa y bajo restricciones prácticas, como lo haría un científico."

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Los modelos masivos superan todos los exámenes, pero se alejan cada vez más del AGI: ¿qué desnuda este artículo?

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片