Terraform Labs, Do Kwon Fail to Have Singapore Class-Action Suit Rejected: Report

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-30Actualizado a 2023-12-01

Resumen

The suit was filed in September 2022 by Julian Moreno Beltran and Douglas Gan on behalf of 375 others, who claim they lost a combined $57 million.

Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, may be hit with a class-action lawsuit in Singapore after the High Court dismissed an attempt to have it thrown out, Business Times reported on Thursday.

Terraform lawyers tried to shift the action to an arbitration process, citing the website's terms of use, according to the Business Times. The lawyers claimed users had foregone the right to trial and to join a class-action suit. The court ruled otherwise.

10

"To our knowledge, this is the furthest a class-action suit has progressed in the world," Mahesh Rai, a director of Drew & Napier, which represents the claimants, said in an interview. "Now we are approaching discovery stage."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The suit was filed in September 2022 by Julian Moreno Beltran and Douglas Gan on behalf of 375 others, who claim they lost a combined $57 million.

The claimants are alleging fraudulent misrepresentation by Terraform Labs, Do Kwon and his co-founders in their promotion of the algorithmic stablecoin terraUSD (UST), which led them to purchase and stake the tokens and hold on to them as UST lost its peg to the U.S. dollar in May 2022 and plunged to less than $0.10.

Terraform also faces charges of fraud in the U.S. brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which alleges it was selling unregistered securities. In October, Terraform asked for this case to be dismissed on the grounds that the regulator had been unable to make its case.

The company did not immediately respond to CoinDesk's request for further comment.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La demanda de Hyperliquid se profundiza mientras las instituciones persiguen rendimientos por staking – ¿Es solo una moda pasajera?

El mecanismo de comisiones prioritarias de Hyperliquid (HYPE) está transformando la demanda del token, pasando de ser una narrativa de trading a una fuente estructural de consumo de oferta. Desde su lanzamiento el 14 de abril, se han quemado cerca de 21.895 tokens a través de estos fees, aumentando 45 veces en las últimas semanas y con un número de participantes que creció de 14 a 130, lo que sugiere una adopción más amplia y resiliente. Esta demanda se está consolidando aún más con la participación institucional a largo plazo. Bitwise depositó y apostó (staking) aproximadamente 1,775 millones de HYPE (unos $114 millones), señalando que valora el rendimiento recurrente de la staking más que la liquidez a corto plazo. Esta acción, combinada con la quema de fees, crea múltiples sumideros de demanda que refuerzan mutuamente el token. Aunque 21Shares redujo su exposición vendiendo alrededor de $1,8 millones en HYPE, esto parece más un rebalanceo de cartera o toma de beneficios aislada que una capitulación generalizada. Por tanto, las reducciones institucionales siguen siendo limitadas y no contrarrestan el creciente compromiso de otros grandes tenedores a largo plazo. En resumen, la combinación de quema de comisiones y staking continúa reduciendo la oferta circulante de HYPE y reforzando su demanda estructural.

ambcryptoHace 51 min(s)

La demanda de Hyperliquid se profundiza mientras las instituciones persiguen rendimientos por staking – ¿Es solo una moda pasajera?

ambcryptoHace 51 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片