Central Banks Have No Interest in Personal Data, BIS Official Says While Promoting CBDCs

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-27Actualizado a 2023-11-28

Resumen

The Bank for International Settlements has been calling on countries to prepare for CBDCs as governments face backlash over privacy concerns.

  • Retail central bank digital currencies (CBDC) have drawn criticism from lawmakers and the public around the world over privacy concerns.
  • Unlike the private sector, central banks have no interest in personal data, Bank for International Settlements official Cecilia Skingsley said Tuesday.
  • She urged people to stay open to technological innovation.
9.2K
Vivek Ramaswamy Seen as Most Formidable Trump Challenger by Blockchain Bettors

Central banks have no interest in personal data, said Bank for International Settlements (BIS) official Cecilia Skingsley on Tuesday, seemingly looking to quell privacy concerns surrounding national digital currencies.

The central bank group has been pushing governments around the world to continue work on central bank digital currencies (CBDC) to prepare for the future of payments.

However, monetary authorities in major jurisdictions like the U.S. and the European Union are facing mounting criticism over plans to issue CBDCs, and a chief concern is if and how citizens’ privacy will be protected.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The public too would feel better about using digital versions of fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar or British pound if privacy was preserved. Ensuring privacy increased participants' willingness to use a CBDC by up to 60% when purchasing privacy-sensitive products, a recent BIS report showed.

Skingsley, is the head of the BIS’ Innovation Hub which is responsible for multiple CBDC research projects with central banks around the world. Skingsley addressed privacy fears while speaking at the Atlantic Council's CBDC conference in Washington DC, and urged the public to stay open to technological innovation.

"Central banks have no commercial interest in personal data – unlike the private sector," she said.

Information that banks have on where, how and what people spend money on is protected by legal frameworks – something which Skingsley urged should be preserved when countries decide to issue retail CBDCs.

When considering the design of a CBDC, people will also have to grapple with difficult questions on choice, inclusion and stability, Skingsley said. But "innovation usually takes us to new places and opens up possibilities that were not there until a new technological breakthrough has happened," she added.

Some people are concerned that retail CBDCs could cause bank runs – where too many people withdraw their money at the same time putting pressure on banks’ liquidity. With the right provisions like fast-acting crisis management tools and limits on fund withdrawals, CBDCs won't necessarily increase the possibility of bank runs, Skingsley said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Wholesale CBDCs, which are another type of currency used only between banks, could be a "game changer" for cross border payments, she added, pointing to BIS Innovation Hub projects like Jura, Dunbar and mBridge as examples.

"Based on our findings, benefits from issuing a wholesale CBDC could include operational transparency, faster settlement, and less risk," Skingsley said.

The BIS will on Wednesday publish the conclusions from project Tourbillon, which proposes new privacy solutions for retail CBDCs.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Arbitraje de Harness, rescatando DeFi desde el borde del SaaS

# Resumen en español europeo El artículo explora la intersección entre la inteligencia artificial (IA) y las finanzas descentralizadas (DeFi), argumentando que el modelo organizativo y de *tokens* de la IA es más eficiente que el de DeFi. Señala que el capitalismo ha evolucionado hacia la cuantificación de la mano de obra y los datos de los usuarios, pero la organización humana sigue siendo difícil de medir. La IA, mediante *tokens* asequibles y *agents* prácticos, está transformando esto al convertir las capacidades humanas en *skills* cuantificables y redefinir la colaboración en espacios digitales (*Harness*). DeFi, aunque pionera, se ha convertido en un modelo SaaS tradicional, centrado en cobrar por transacciones en lugar de innovar. La IA amenaza este modelo al vender "capacidad de trabajo" en lugar de *tokens*, democratizando habilidades antes monopolizadas por grandes empresas. El autor sugiere que la IA puede reformar DeFi mejorando la seguridad de los contratos inteligentes (ej. con sistemas como Mythos), optimizando la organización humana y reinventando la economía de *tokens* para reflejar mejor el rendimiento del capital y el riesgo en tiempo real. Concluye que, aunque la IA reduce el valor de los datos y el contenido hasta casi cero, abre nuevas oportunidades económicas para los individuos, con *agents* manejando tareas repetitivas y micro-pagos, mientras el valor real reside en el comportamiento humano único.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Arbitraje de Harness, rescatando DeFi desde el borde del SaaS

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片