Trader Made $49 Million Profit and Lost $24 Million in 12 Seconds Shorting ETH

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-20Last updated on 2026-08-20

Abstract

A crypto trader known as "pension‐usdt.eth" had their large Ethereum short position forcibly liquidated in just 12 seconds, resulting in a loss of nearly $24 million. Prior to this, the wallet, using the display name "Pension Fund," had been one of the year's most successful short sellers, accruing an estimated $49 million in total profit from bets against cryptocurrencies, including profitable shorts on 60,000 ETH and 1,400 BTC in June. The liquidation on the Hyperliquid platform was triggered by a sharp price surge in major tokens. Five forced-sell orders for a total of 50,000 ETH were executed from 04:51:03 to 04:51:15, accelerating the price increase. Four batches of ETH were sold at prices ranging from $2,193 to $2,236. The remaining 1,417 ETH were absorbed by Hyperliquid's special fund as no buyers were found. During the 12-second event, Ether's price jumped by $43. The short position had been held for roughly two months (1,445 hours) during a period of lower Bitcoin prices. The market reversed following a U.S. Treasury bond buyback announcement, with Ether gaining $18 in 24 hours. The trader's wallet is now essentially empty, showing a 100% loss against a trading volume of $111.76 million. This event was part of a broader market liquidation of $2.74 billion in short positions in 24 hours, the largest such wave since 2021.

The Hyperliquid wallet identified as pension‐usdt.eth, which had been shorting Ethereum for two months, was forced out of its short position on 50,000 $ETH amid a sharp price surge. The liquidation process, lasting 12 seconds, involved five forced sell orders — these transactions further pushed prices higher.

On Thursday morning, the position was closed after a rise in the prices of major tokens, resulting in the trader losing nearly $24 million. Previously, this wallet was considered one of the most successful short sellers of the year, with total profits from bets against cryptocurrencies reaching about $49 million.

Recent trades yielded a series of wins: nearly $6 million from shorting 60,000 $ETH (position closed in June), $3.6 million from shorting 1,400 BTC in the same month, and $1.7 million from another bet against Bitcoin in March.

The position liquidation occurred from 04:51:03 to 04:51:15 according to Hyperliquid data. During this time, four batches of ETH were forcibly sold:

  • 9,989 $ETH at a price of $2,193;
  • 20,698 $ETH at $2,209;
  • 15,830 $ETH at $2,214;
  • 1,871 $ETH at $2,236.

The remaining 1,417 $ETH found no buyers by the end of the process, and Hyperliquid absorbed this volume into a special fund created for such situations.

In just 12 seconds, the price of ETH rose by $43. The forced sale of the trader's assets partially triggered this rise, and each additional dollar made closing the remaining parts of the position more expensive.

The position was held for 1,445 hours — just over two months. This period coincided with Bitcoin trading below $65,000, making bets against it seem like a sure win. However, the situation changed after the U.S. Treasury announced a bond buyback on Wednesday: over the past 24 hours, ETH rose by $18 to nearly $70,000.

The wallet balance is now empty. According to Hyperliquid's leaderboard, the wallet under the display name "Pension Fund" holds just $35.61 and shows a 100% decline against a trading volume of $111.76 million during this period.

This is not the largest loss of the day. The greatest damage was suffered by the owner of a $48.8 million Bitcoin position also held on Hyperliquid. In total, $2.74 billion in shorts were liquidated in the market over 24 hours — the largest wave of forced position closures since 2021.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the total profit earned by the 'pension-usdt.eth' wallet from shorting cryptocurrencies before this liquidation event?

AThe wallet had earned a total profit of about $49 million from betting against cryptocurrencies before the liquidation event.

QHow much did the trader lose during the 12-second liquidation of their 50,000 ETH short position?

AThe trader lost nearly $24 million during the forced liquidation of their 50,000 ETH short position.

QWhat event triggered the sudden price increase of Ethereum that led to the mass liquidation of short positions?

AThe announcement by the U.S. Department of the Treasury about a bond buyback on Wednesday triggered a sharp price increase in cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, leading to the mass liquidation of short positions.

QWhat happened to the remaining 1,417 ETH that was not sold during the forced liquidation process?

AThe remaining 1,417 ETH found no buyers by the end of the liquidation process, and Hyperliquid absorbed this volume into a special fund created for such situations.

QAccording to the article, what was the total value of short positions liquidated across the market in that 24-hour period?

AA total of $2.74 billion worth of short positions were liquidated across the market in that 24-hour period, marking the largest wave of forced position closures since 2021.

Related Reads

MSX US Stock Daily Observation: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings: AI Cloud Revenue Growth Hits Record High, AI Cloud Achieves Profitable Closed Loop

**MSX Daily US Stock Watch: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings – AI Cloud Revenue Hits Record Growth, Achieves Profitability Milestone** Alibaba's Q1 FY2027 revenue slightly exceeded expectations at 268.9B yuan (+9% YoY). However, adjusted net profit of 20.7B yuan (-38% YoY) and adjusted EPS missed consensus significantly. This shortfall was primarily driven by increased AI investments and two one-time items: a 5.5B euro provision for an EU Digital Services Act fine and 4.46B yuan in goodwill impairment. The restructured business segments showed clear divergence. The standout performer was the AI Cloud & Computing Services unit, with revenue surging 45% YoY to 48.44B yuan. Crucially, its adjusted EBITA jumped 133% YoY to 5.63B yuan, with margins expanding to 12%, signaling a profitable commercial loop for AI infrastructure. Within the Commerce Group, revenue growth was mixed: China Local Services (instant retail) grew 45% to 53.3B yuan, largely offsetting an 8% decline in Traditional China Commerce (110.9B yuan). International commerce revenue fell 1%. Despite this, the Commerce Group's adjusted EBITA dipped only 1% YoY to 39.75B yuan. A key area to watch is cash flow. Capital expenditures soared 75% YoY to 67.68B yuan, turning free cash flow to a net outflow of 44.67B yuan. However, operating cash flow remained positive and grew 11% YoY to 22.95B yuan, indicating the cash burn is a strategic choice for AI capacity build-out rather than operational weakness. In summary, while headline profits were pressured by heavy AI spending and one-off charges, the core takeaway is the emerging profitability of the AI Cloud business. The success of Alibaba's current investment cycle hinges on whether the profit improvement in AI Cloud can outpace the depreciation costs of its massive computing infrastructure expansion.

Odaily星球日报23m ago

MSX US Stock Daily Observation: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings: AI Cloud Revenue Growth Hits Record High, AI Cloud Achieves Profitable Closed Loop

Odaily星球日报23m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片