1inch confirms Anton Bukov’s departure after co-founder says he was fired

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-16Last updated on 2026-07-16

Abstract

Decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project. Bukov stated he was fired in late November 2025 and announced a new DeFi venture, Second Tier. While he remains a co-founder and shareholder, he has no operational or security role at 1inch. The company confirmed his lack of active involvement since December 2025 but stressed that operations, protocols, and development roadmap remain unaffected under co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing team. The departure follows several unrelated security incidents in 2024 and 2025, but 1inch maintains its core systems and user funds were not impacted.

Decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project. This was after Bukov publicly revealed that he had been fired from the company late last year and announced a new DeFi venture.

In a statement posted on X, Bukov said he was dismissed in late November 2025, adding that he no longer has any role in 1inch’s operations, product architecture or security.

Shortly afterwards, 1inch confirmed that he has not been actively involved with the project since December 2025. It stressed that the protocol and its roadmap remain unchanged.

Bukov announces departure and new project

Bukov, who co-founded 1inch in 2019, said his work focused on the protocol’s architecture, security and economic design. He credited himself with leading the development of several core products, including the 1inch Router, Fusion and its cross-chain infrastructure.

According to Bukov, user and colleague feedback prompted him to become more involved in the company’s leadership and operational management. However, he said those efforts ultimately ended with his dismissal in late November 2025.

Despite his exit from day-to-day operations, Bukov said he remains a co-founder and 50% shareholder in the company.

He also announced the launch of a new DeFi project, Second Tier [tier.xyz], which he said will focus on building secure and efficient financial infrastructure.

1inch says operations remain unaffected

Responding to Bukov’s announcement, 1inch confirmed that he is no longer contributing to the project and has not been actively involved in any associated organizations since December 2025.

The company said Bukov’s departure does not affect the operation of the 1inch Network. It added that its protocols, infrastructure, and core systems continue to function normally.

It also said co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing executive leadership team remain responsible for the network’s strategy and development.

While 1inch acknowledged Bukov’s contributions over the years, it did not address his claim that he was fired.

Departure follows security incidents in 2025

Bukov’s exit comes after 1inch addressed several security incidents across its broader ecosystem.

In March 2025, attackers exploited an obsolete Fusion V1 resolver contract, resulting in losses of approximately $5 million. The company said the incident affected only outdated resolver integrations.

At the same time, the live Fusion V2 protocol and end-user funds remained unaffected.

It later recovered most of the stolen assets after reaching an agreement with the attacker.

Earlier, in December 2024, 1inch disclosed that a resolver smart contract had been compromised following a private key breach. The company also said that the incident did not affect the core protocol or users’ funds.

There is no indication that either security incident was connected to Bukov’s departure.


Final Summary

  • 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project after Bukov revealed he was fired in late 2025.
  • The company said operations, infrastructure, and development remain unchanged under the existing leadership.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why is Anton Bukov no longer involved with 1inch?

AAnton Bukov stated publicly that he was fired from 1inch in late November 2025. The company later confirmed he is no longer contributing to the project and has not been actively involved since December 2025.

QWhat new project did Anton Bukov announce after his departure from 1inch?

AAnton Bukov announced the launch of a new DeFi project called Second Tier (tier.xyz), which will focus on building secure and efficient financial infrastructure.

QHow did 1inch describe the impact of Anton Bukov's departure on its operations?

A1inch stated that Bukov's departure does not affect the operation of the 1inch Network. It said its protocols, infrastructure, core systems, and development roadmap remain unchanged under the leadership of co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing executive team.

QWhat were the two security incidents mentioned in the article that occurred prior to Bukov's departure?

AThe two security incidents were: 1) In March 2025, an exploit of an obsolete Fusion V1 resolver contract led to ~$5 million in losses (most later recovered). 2) In December 2024, a resolver smart contract was compromised due to a private key breach. 1inch stated neither affected the core protocol or user funds.

QWhat key roles and contributions did Anton Bukov claim for himself at 1inch?

ABukov stated his work focused on the protocol's architecture, security, and economic design. He credited himself with leading the development of core products like the 1inch Router, Fusion, and its cross-chain infrastructure.

Related Reads

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit12m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit12m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit16m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit16m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

Claude has introduced a major new feature called "Record a Skill," available for Pro, Max, and Team users. This function, found in the Claude desktop app's CoWork menu, allows users to create reusable AI skills simply by recording their screen and providing voice narration while performing a task. Claude then automatically analyzes the recording and generates a functional Skill. A hands-on test confirmed the feature works seamlessly. Users start recording via the Skills manager, perform their workflow while verbally explaining the steps and logic, and avoid including sensitive information. After recording, Claude processes the content and creates the Skill, which can be saved and later invoked with a slash command (/). This eliminates the need for manual adjustments or writing complex instruction files. The innovation goes beyond mere efficiency. Previously, creating a Skill required writing a detailed SKILL.md file in Markdown—a significant barrier for non-technical users. "Record a Skill" bypasses this by directly capturing both actions and the implicit reasoning shared in the narration. This lowers the barrier to knowledge transfer and automation, addressing a core challenge in corporate knowledge management: the difficulty of getting experts to write and maintain documentation. However, the feature also highlights a shift in the nature of work. A case study from March 2026 showed a freelancer whose five-year client relationship was effectively replaced by a hand-coded Claude Skill automating their content workflow. With the even lower barrier of screen recording, the ability to distill personal expertise into automatable skills accelerates this trend. The "moat" for work is moving from simply knowing how to do a task to mastering tasks that are difficult or impossible to automate.

marsbit21m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

marsbit21m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

Feeding "Noise" to AI Can Improve Performance: A Method Enables Positive Transfer from Noise This work, Semi-Supervised Noise Adaptation (SSNA), introduces a Noise Adaptation Framework (NAF) that challenges traditional transfer learning. Instead of requiring a labeled source domain of real data (e.g., images, text), NAF uses randomly generated Gaussian noise as the source. For a target task with C classes, it constructs C noise clusters by sampling from Gaussian distributions. Although this synthetic noise contains no semantic meaning, NAF trains it to form a discriminative class structure in a shared representation space—clustering same-class noise and separating different classes. The key is aligning this learned structure from the noise domain to the real, sparsely labeled target domain. A small number of target labels are still essential to establish the correspondence between noise clusters and actual classes. The training objective combines: 1) supervised loss on the few labeled target samples, 2) classification loss for the noise to build its structure, and 3) a distribution alignment loss (using Negative Domain Similarity) to minimize the gap between the noise and target domains in the shared space. Experiments show significant gains in few-label settings. With just 4 labels per class, NAF with a ResNet-18 backbone improves accuracy over a standard supervised baseline (ERM) by +12.35% on CIFAR-10, +7.61% on CIFAR-100, +4.38% on DTD-47, and +2.74% on Caltech-101. It also benefits fine-grained datasets and scales to ImageNet-1K (with 100 labels/class) and text classification (AG News). NAF can be integrated into existing semi-supervised methods like FixMatch for further gains. Ablation studies confirm the transferred benefit comes from the discriminative structure of the noise, not randomness itself. Collapsing all noise into a single point causes negative transfer, while increasing separation between noise cluster centers improves performance. The amount of noise per class is less critical once a basic structure forms. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that for positive transfer, the semantic content of source data may not be necessary. What can be effectively transferred is the *organizational structure* of categories within a representation space. This offers a promising alternative for scenarios where real source data is unavailable due to privacy, copyright, or procurement constraints.

marsbit22m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

marsbit22m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片