Robinhood Chain flips Hyperliquid – 2 metrics show speculative interest

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-11Last updated on 2026-07-11

Abstract

Robinhood Chain, a new Ethereum Layer 2, has rapidly become a major hub for speculative trading, surpassing Hyperliquid and BNB Chain in daily DEX volume. Its volume skyrocketed from under $10 million to a record $600 million, driven largely by viral memecoins like CashCat and a public bet by Robinhood's CEO. This surge has positioned it as the fourth-largest chain for such activity. However, the memecoin frenzy has reignited a broader debate about the value of L2s to Ethereum. Critics, including Bankless's David Hoffman, argue L2s operate as largely independent chains that do not economically benefit ETH. Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams countered that ETH-denominated trading pairs could increase ETH burns. The debate centers on whether L2 growth, while scaling Ethereum, ultimately undermines ETH's value by reducing transaction fees burned on the mainnet.

The new Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) Robinhood Chain has surpassed Hyperliquid and BNB Chain in speculative interest.

A week ago, Robinhood’s DEX volume (which tracks trading volume and broader speculative interest) was less than $10M.

As of writing, the daily DEX volume has hit a record level of $600M, making it the fourth dominant chain in speculative activity.

In the past two days, it has effectively surpassed BNB Chain and Hyperliquid on this front thanks to Robinhood’s CEO’s memecoin bet.

Source: DeFiLlama

As Robinhood Chain-based memecoins like CashCat [CASHCAT] went viral and posted massive gains, the FOMO attracted users and capital inflows.

Robinhood’s memecoin frenzy sparks L2 debate

If the memecoin mania persists, it could surpass Base in DEX volume to become the third-largest place for speculative trading.

Worth pointing out that Uniswap crossed $1B in volume on Robinhood Chain since launch, further underscoring how crazy the memecoin mania is on the new L2.

Source: DeFiLlama

But critics have been opposing the memecoin push. Most questioned the need for another Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) if its use case is risky memecoin speculation. The debate has since evolved to whether L2 growth benefits ETH’s value.

For Bankless’ David Hoffman, L2s aren’t helpful to ETH.

By now it seems more clear that L2s are largely independent blockchains and the vast majority of economics is not captured by ETH (by design).

Uniswap CEO Hayden Adam countered that most of the pairs on the chain are denominated in ETH and will eventually help burn more ETH, especially if the RWA narrative picks up momentum.

Source: X

Do Layer 2s actually help Ethereum?

The L2 roadmap has been under heavy criticism. With corporate chains such as Stripe’s Tempo, SWIFT, and more, the criticism has deepened.

For lawyer Gabriel Shapiro, the entire roadmap was ‘poorly executed’ to benefit ETH value.

The roadmap was just very poorly executed so that it’s mostly negative to ETH & leaves the L2s with too much optionality to become L1s, no real lock-in.

Ethereum’s best shot at scaling was through L2s, and recent upgrades have made them cheaper and attracted more traffic.

But this has also reduced the number of ETH burned, making the asset inflationary and denting its ‘store of value’ narrative.

Source: Ultrasoundmoney

Whether the renewed L2 debate will drag ETH’s market sentiment and price remains to be seen. As of writing, Ethereum [ETH] traded at $1.8K, a key inflection point that could trigger the next leg of price recovery or another pullback.


Final Summary

  • Robinhood L2 has become the fourth largest on-chain place for speculative trading, flipping BNB Chain and Hyperliquid
  • Amid the hype, Ethereum L2s are under scrutiny again for being non-beneficial to ETH’s value

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat recent achievement did Robinhood Chain accomplish according to the article?

ARobinhood Chain has become the fourth largest on-chain platform for speculative trading, surpassing BNB Chain and Hyperliquid in daily DEX volume, which reached a record $600 million.

QWhat is the primary driver behind the surge in speculative activity on Robinhood Chain?

AThe surge is primarily driven by a memecoin frenzy, particularly following a memecoin bet by Robinhood's CEO, which led to viral memecoins like CashCat [CASHCAT] posting massive gains and attracting significant user interest and capital inflows.

QWhat criticism is highlighted regarding Ethereum Layer 2s (L2s) in the article?

AThe main criticism is that L2s are largely independent blockchains and their economic activity does not significantly benefit Ethereum (ETH) by capturing value for it. Critics argue this design has made L2s potentially negative for ETH's value, reducing the amount of ETH burned and making the asset inflationary.

QWhat does Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams argue about L2s and Ethereum?

AHayden Adams counters the criticism by arguing that since most trading pairs on L2s are denominated in ETH, the increased activity will eventually help burn more ETH. He believes this will be especially beneficial if the Real World Asset (RWA) narrative gains momentum.

QAccording to the article, what is a key concern about Ethereum's current price level?

AAs of the article's writing, Ethereum is trading at $1.8K, which is identified as a key inflection point that could determine whether the price begins its next recovery phase or experiences another pullback.

Related Reads

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit12m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit12m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit16m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit16m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

Claude has introduced a major new feature called "Record a Skill," available for Pro, Max, and Team users. This function, found in the Claude desktop app's CoWork menu, allows users to create reusable AI skills simply by recording their screen and providing voice narration while performing a task. Claude then automatically analyzes the recording and generates a functional Skill. A hands-on test confirmed the feature works seamlessly. Users start recording via the Skills manager, perform their workflow while verbally explaining the steps and logic, and avoid including sensitive information. After recording, Claude processes the content and creates the Skill, which can be saved and later invoked with a slash command (/). This eliminates the need for manual adjustments or writing complex instruction files. The innovation goes beyond mere efficiency. Previously, creating a Skill required writing a detailed SKILL.md file in Markdown—a significant barrier for non-technical users. "Record a Skill" bypasses this by directly capturing both actions and the implicit reasoning shared in the narration. This lowers the barrier to knowledge transfer and automation, addressing a core challenge in corporate knowledge management: the difficulty of getting experts to write and maintain documentation. However, the feature also highlights a shift in the nature of work. A case study from March 2026 showed a freelancer whose five-year client relationship was effectively replaced by a hand-coded Claude Skill automating their content workflow. With the even lower barrier of screen recording, the ability to distill personal expertise into automatable skills accelerates this trend. The "moat" for work is moving from simply knowing how to do a task to mastering tasks that are difficult or impossible to automate.

marsbit21m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

marsbit21m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

Feeding "Noise" to AI Can Improve Performance: A Method Enables Positive Transfer from Noise This work, Semi-Supervised Noise Adaptation (SSNA), introduces a Noise Adaptation Framework (NAF) that challenges traditional transfer learning. Instead of requiring a labeled source domain of real data (e.g., images, text), NAF uses randomly generated Gaussian noise as the source. For a target task with C classes, it constructs C noise clusters by sampling from Gaussian distributions. Although this synthetic noise contains no semantic meaning, NAF trains it to form a discriminative class structure in a shared representation space—clustering same-class noise and separating different classes. The key is aligning this learned structure from the noise domain to the real, sparsely labeled target domain. A small number of target labels are still essential to establish the correspondence between noise clusters and actual classes. The training objective combines: 1) supervised loss on the few labeled target samples, 2) classification loss for the noise to build its structure, and 3) a distribution alignment loss (using Negative Domain Similarity) to minimize the gap between the noise and target domains in the shared space. Experiments show significant gains in few-label settings. With just 4 labels per class, NAF with a ResNet-18 backbone improves accuracy over a standard supervised baseline (ERM) by +12.35% on CIFAR-10, +7.61% on CIFAR-100, +4.38% on DTD-47, and +2.74% on Caltech-101. It also benefits fine-grained datasets and scales to ImageNet-1K (with 100 labels/class) and text classification (AG News). NAF can be integrated into existing semi-supervised methods like FixMatch for further gains. Ablation studies confirm the transferred benefit comes from the discriminative structure of the noise, not randomness itself. Collapsing all noise into a single point causes negative transfer, while increasing separation between noise cluster centers improves performance. The amount of noise per class is less critical once a basic structure forms. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that for positive transfer, the semantic content of source data may not be necessary. What can be effectively transferred is the *organizational structure* of categories within a representation space. This offers a promising alternative for scenarios where real source data is unavailable due to privacy, copyright, or procurement constraints.

marsbit22m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

marsbit22m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LAYER (LAYER) are presented below.

活动图片