Why is Crypto the Key Infrastructure for the Large-Scale Adoption of AI Agents?

深潮Published on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Why Crypto is Key Infrastructure for AI Agent Mass Adoption For AI Agents to become widely deployable autonomous software, they require two core capabilities: composability and verifiability. These are inherently lacking in traditional Web2 systems but are natively provided by cryptocurrency networks. AI's future lies not in isolated models but in agents that automatically call services, compose with other agents, write code, test, and execute decisions involving financial actions. This agent composability depends on verifiability—knowing another agent executed as promised. Web2 infrastructure (APIs and SaaS) fails here due to black-box operations, mutable data, unprovable results, centralized audits, and manual settlements. Cryptocurrency provides the missing verified base layer through: 1. Verifiable Execution: Smart contracts and ZK proofs enable transparent, provable on/off-chain actions. 2. Verifiable Identity: DIDs and signed agent code ensure trust and integrity. 3. Verifiable Value Transfer: Automated payments, revenue sharing, collateralization, and penalties enable direct fund management without intermediaries. As AI evolves from code generation to full-cycle automation (writing, testing, running, fixing), especially with real-world financial impact, crypto becomes essential. It enables automatic penalties for failures, rewards for contributions, multi-agent settlements, and trustless coordination—making AI economically viable beyond demos. In short: AI enables...

Written by: Blockchain Knight

For AI Agents to truly become "widely deployable autonomous software," the two most critical capabilities are: composability + verifiability.

These are precisely what traditional Web2 cannot provide, but cryptocurrency systems inherently possess.

1. AI needs composability, and composability must be built on verifiability

The future of AI Agents is not a single model, but rather: automatically calling other services; combining other Agents; automatically writing code; automatically testing; automatically executing decisions (including actions involving funds). This is called agent composability.

The problem arises: if one Agent calls another Agent, but you cannot verify whether the other party actually executed as expected, the entire automation ecosystem cannot form a closed loop.

Web2 infrastructure (API + SaaS) cannot provide this strong verifiability because: APIs are black boxes; data can be tampered with; execution results cannot be proven; permissions rely on centralized audits; funds cannot be settled automatically.

In other words: a Web2 Agent cannot fully trust another Web2 Agent. Therefore, automation stops at the "demo level."

2. Cryptocurrency provides the "verifiable base layer" that AI lacks

Crypto provides the underlying three major capabilities needed for AI's future ecosystem:

1 Verifiable execution

Smart contracts are transparent and provable. ZK proofs enable even complex off-chain execution to be verified. AI can confirm that "the other party indeed did what I requested."

2 Verifiable identity

Decentralized identity DID/Key, and the Agent code itself can be signed.

This solves: who did it, whether it is trustworthy, and whether it has been tampered with.

3 Verifiable value transfer

Smart contracts support: automatic deductions, automatic payments, profit-sharing for multi-party collaboration, collateral and penalties, and escrow mechanisms.

This enables AI to directly manage and allocate funds without relying on institutions. This is something Web2 cannot achieve.

3. AI programming requires "self-testability," and involving funds requires "automatic verifiability" even more

Anthropic's recent acquisition of Bun is a signal:

AI is evolving from "automatically writing code" to a complete cycle of "automatically write → automatically test → automatically run → automatically fix."

Once AI automatically runs code and that code directly impacts the real world—such as executing trades, managing budgets, paying API fees, and participating in economic activities—it must have cryptocurrency's verifiable fund security system.

Otherwise, AI is just a toy and cannot engage in the real economy.

Crypto enables AI to:

  • Automatically penalize "execution errors";

  • Automatically reward "good contributions";

  • Automatically settle accounts during multi-Agent collaboration;

  • Automatically settle without requiring human trust.

This is a necessity for the future AI Agent economy.

4. Summarized in one sentence

AI automates software; Crypto makes automation trustworthy. Without the verifiability provided by cryptocurrency, AI Agents cannot operate at scale in the real economy.

Related Questions

QWhy is verifiability crucial for the composability of AI Agents?

AVerifiability ensures that when one AI Agent calls another, it can confirm the other Agent executed as expected, which is essential for building a trustworthy and automated ecosystem. Without verifiability, composability cannot be reliably achieved, hindering large-scale deployment.

QHow does cryptocurrency provide the verifiable execution layer that AI Agents need?

ACryptocurrency enables verifiable execution through smart contracts and zero-knowledge proofs, ensuring transparency and provability. This allows AI Agents to trust that actions, such as service calls or transactions, are performed correctly without relying on central authorities.

QWhat are the three key capabilities that cryptocurrency offers to support AI Agent ecosystems?

ACryptocurrency provides three key capabilities: 1) Verifiable execution via smart contracts and ZK proofs, 2) Verifiable identity through decentralized systems like DID/Key, and 3) Verifiable value transfer, enabling automatic payments, settlements, and economic interactions without human intervention.

QWhy can't traditional Web2 infrastructure support large-scale AI Agent automation?

AWeb2 infrastructure relies on APIs and SaaS that are opaque, mutable, and lack provability. It cannot guarantee untampered data, verified execution results, or automated value transfer, making it impossible for AI Agents to fully trust each other or operate autonomously in economic contexts.

QHow does cryptocurrency enable AI's transition from 'automated coding' to a full cycle of writing, testing, running, and fixing?

ACryptocurrency provides a verifiable financial and execution layer that allows AI to autonomously manage funds, enforce penalties for errors, reward contributions, and facilitate multi-Agent settlements. This ensures safe and trustworthy automation in real-world economic activities, moving beyond mere code generation to full operational cycles.

Related Reads

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

Zcash Orchard Bug: Four Key Questions Answered A critical forgery vulnerability was discovered in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, raising four major concerns for users. 1. **Was the Orchard bug exploited?** The likelihood is considered low. The bug was found proactively using advanced AI-assisted tools and was promptly patched, limiting any potential attack window. If exploitation had occurred, evidence would likely have surfaced by now. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** It is believed so, based on the assessment that the bug was not exploited. If forgery did happen, existing "turnstile" mechanisms could prevent full recovery of legitimate funds if forged coins were moved out first, though this scenario is deemed unlikely. Users can choose to move funds, but this carries risks like loss of privacy or new wallet/software issues. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Currently, no. The vulnerability's prior existence prevented independent verification of the shielded supply. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade will restore this ability by sealing the Orchard pool, allowing anyone running a node to verify that the circulating ZEC does not exceed the correct amount. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing intensive audits by multiple teams, including AI-assisted analysis, have not found additional forgery vulnerabilities, increasing confidence that none remain. Further work and collaborations are planned to provide additional guarantees. In conclusion, while the team assesses that exploitation was unlikely and the supply is safe, the upcoming upgrade is critical to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's supply integrity, moving away from reliance on trust.

marsbit33m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

marsbit33m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

**Summary: Zcash Orchard Vulnerability Analysis** A critical forgery vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising concerns about the coin's supply and user funds. The developers, led by Zcash Open Development Labs, acted swiftly to temporarily freeze the pool and deploy a fix. The article addresses four key questions: 1. **Was the vulnerability exploited?** While unknown, the developers believe it is unlikely for several reasons: the bug was difficult to find, using advanced AI tools; the fix was deployed quickly; and typical crypto exploits are fast, with no evidence of abnormal outflows. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** If the bug was not exploited, all funds are safe. If exploited, a mechanism limits total withdrawals from the pool to the amount legitimately entered, potentially blocking some legitimate funds. The developers deem this unlikely but advise cautious users to consider moving funds, noting the privacy and risk trade-offs of moving to transparent or Sapling pools. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Not currently. The vulnerability temporarily broke the ability for users to independently verify that no extra ZEC was created. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing audits by multiple teams, including using advanced AI analysis, have so far found no others, increasing confidence. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade is the core solution. It will **seal** the Orchard pool, preventing new entries or internal circulation. This action, combined with the existing withdrawal mechanism, will restore the ability for any node operator to verify that Zcash's supply limit has not been violated, regardless of whether exploitation occurred in the past. The upgrade aims to restore the system's long-term credibility through user-verifiable supply integrity.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

Odaily星球日报33m ago

An AI Version of the 'Subprime Crisis'? A Hidden Debt of $1.8 Trillion is Accumulating in the Shadows Amid the Frenzy

Amidst the AI infrastructure construction boom, a massive debt expansion is forming, with the most dangerous portion remaining off-balance sheets. Morgan Stanley research reveals approximately $1.8 trillion in off-balance-sheet exposures, including nearly $1 trillion in purchase commitments and over $800 billion in non-active lease contracts. These future cash outflows are not recorded as liabilities. The leverage of hyperscale cloud companies has surged from 0.9x to 1.8x in just two quarters. Private credit firms like Apollo and Blackstone are shifting leverage into the supply chain through complex, opaque SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) financing structures. Global AI-related bond issuance has skyrocketed, with annual volume projected to exceed $570 billion. However, capital expenditure growth is outpacing revenue and free cash flow. Major cloud providers may see free cash flow approach zero or turn negative in 2026. A significant 'depreciation cliff' looms as vast amounts of current capital spending, recorded as 'construction in progress,' have yet to begin depreciating, artificially inflating current profit margins. Future depreciation could severely pressure earnings. The core risk is identified as a series of timing mismatches, not an immediate solvency crisis. Investment is racing ahead of monetization, leverage is being obscured, and accounting classifications hinder comparability. The entire financing structure faces a fundamental stress test if AI commercialization lags or enterprise clients shift to cheaper alternatives, potentially triggering chain reactions within the highly interconnected funding ecosystem.

marsbit44m ago

An AI Version of the 'Subprime Crisis'? A Hidden Debt of $1.8 Trillion is Accumulating in the Shadows Amid the Frenzy

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片