White House Ignites, BSC Spreads Like Wildfire: A Meme Carnival Bidding Farewell to the 'Imperial Decree Model'

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

A meme coin frenzy erupted on January 21 after the White House posted on X mentioning "victory, eviction, and memes." Within minutes, meme tokens named "memes" were launched on both Solana and BSC chains. Contrary to expectations, the Solana version—typically favored due to its active ecosystem and "first is first" advantage—was outperformed by the BSC version. At its peak, the BSC meme reached a market cap of $28 million with 7,300 holders, while Solana’s version peaked at $3.6 million with 3,900 holders. Real-time user engagement also favored BSC, with nearly 3,000 simultaneous online participants compared to Solana’s sub-1,000. This outcome challenges the long-standing perception that BSC meme coins rely heavily on endorsements from Binance founders CZ and He Yi—a model often mockingly referred to as "Shandong style." Both CZ and He Yi have recently publicly discouraged the practice of creating meme coins based on parsing words from their social posts. CZ explicitly warned followers against buying tokens inspired by his tweets, while He Yi criticized “word-parsing” and “bootlicking” behaviors, urging the community to focus on real project development instead. The surprising success of the BSC memes token—launched 20 minutes after Solana’s version—suggests a possible shift in BSC’s meme culture, moving away from top-down influence toward more organic, community-driven momentum. Whether this marks a lasting change in BSC’s meme ecosystem remains an open question.

Author|Golem(@web 3_golem)

The Meme market today witnessed another legendary "golden dog" story.

On January 21st at 11:10, the official White House account posted on X platform mentioning "victory, eviction operations, and memes". One minute later, a Meme token of the same name, $memes, quickly appeared on the Solana chain; 20 minutes later, a version on the BSC chain was also born. An official Meme race between the two chains began.

From an empirical perspective, the Solana version should have the advantage—not only is the ecosystem active, but it also aligns with the "First is first" consensus. However, the result was surprising: the BSC chain version of $memes surpassed it in market capitalization. According to GMGN data, the BSC version's market cap reached a high of $28 million, with 7,300 holding addresses; while the Solana version's peak was only $3.6 million, with 3,900 holding addresses.

The focus of player attention can also be seen through GMGN's new feature: 3 hours after the token's birth, the number of simultaneous online users for the Solana version remained below 1,000, while the BSC version once approached 3,000.

Although some questioned whether the BSC version's market cap was due to "pump and dump schemes by big players aiming to harvest," the genuine market attention doesn't lie—this time, BSC truly won.

The community often joked that BSC's Meme model was like "Shandong Studies in the crypto circle," where only projects related to CZ and He Yi could succeed, raising concerns about the ecosystem's sustainability. However, BSC's victory in this Meme sprint not only sparked a wave of regret from those who missed out (FOMO), but also prompted the community to reconsider the evolution of its Meme model. As GMGN founder Haze stated: "The BSC 3.0 era has arrived." (Odaily Note: Haze holds 1.93% of BSC chain $memes, ranking second on the holdings list.)

CZ and He Yi Publicly State They Do Not Support "Word-Picking Memes"

I previously shared my thoughts on the BSC Meme model during an Odaily editorial meeting, suggesting that CZ and He Yi were essentially "held hostage" by the community. The current BSC model, which relies on "imperial decrees" for cold starts, feigns continuous interaction, lists on Binance Alpha, and finally gets "poured out" (a likely reference to a meme or specific outcome), is actually a consensus within the BSC community. Although this model started with CZ's unintentional actions in early 2025, they don't actually like it. However,发展到目前这个地步 (developed to this point), CZ and He Yi are powerless to change the situation.

When I published this view, it was merely a conjecture. Recent public statements from CZ and He Yi have proven it to be true. On January 13th, CZ posted saying that while he likes Meme coins, if players blindly follow the trend and buy Meme coins "picked" from his tweets, they are almost certain to lose money.

To prevent everyone from blindly chasing these "word-picking Memes," CZ's tweets have become more cautious. Yesterday, CZ reposted a plush toy created by a user based on his image, which was an ordinary thing, but CZ still specifically noted: If you create or buy Meme coins based on my tweets, please note that I may not mention the same words again for a long time, maybe never. I do not recommend you do this. He even added a 🙏 icon at the end, showing CZ's concern for the community.

Compared to CZ's tactfulness, He Yi's attitude towards the community's "word-picking Memes" was more blunt. In the early hours of January 21st, under a user's post, He Yi not only stated that Binance would severely punish all internal insider trading and bribery, but also "assertively" said that she does not need to rely on Binance Alpha listing Memes that pick words from her tweets for pleasure, and also advised the community to focus on real development, not to mistake "word-picking and flattery" as genuine constructive effort and be self-satisfied. He Yi also mentioned that she doesn't like eating fish (a likely reference to a specific meme or context, perhaps '山东学 Shandong Studies'), and told players not to cry "Shandong Studies" just because Binance Alpha didn't list the tokens she supported.

Under the influence of CZ and He Yi's public statements against "word-picking Memes," Binance's official announcements about Memes have also become cautious. On January 21st, Binance's Chinese-language account posted about launching a new Meme product feature, but to prevent the community from finding angles to launch Meme coins, the editor specifically added a very thick mosaic. Although somewhat戏谑 (playful/mocking), it sufficiently shows the cautious attitude of the entire Binance team, both towards Meme coins picking words from CZ and He Yi's tweets, and those picking words from Binance's official announcements.

Is BSC Meme Finally Going to Be Different?

Laymen watch the热闹 (excitement), experts watch the门道 ( intricacies). He Yi's remarks not only felt very "human" (活人感), but seasoned Meme players realized that the previous BSC Meme model is collapsing from the top down. The successful BSC chain $memes that outperformed on the morning of January 21st might be just an appetizer. Ironically, $memes was also born from the art of "word-picking," only this time it was the White House.

Additionally, after the White House posted the tweet, He Yi reposted it (now deleted). This repost, unrelated to Binance and He Yi herself, seemed slightly突兀 (abrupt/out of place) on her homepage timeline, and the community was confused about the reason for the repost. How much credit He Yi's repost deserves for the BSC version of $memes, launched 20 minutes later, outperforming Solana's $memes is also questionable.

Finally, we might still have to ask that unchanging question: Will BSC really be different this time?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the unexpected outcome in the meme coin race between Solana and BSC following the White House's post?

AContrary to expectations, the Solana version of the 'memes' coin did not dominate. The BSC version achieved a higher market cap, reaching a peak of $28 million with 7,300 holder addresses, compared to Solana's $3.6 million with 3,900 holders.

QWhat is the 'Saint Edict Mode' or 'Shandong Mode' that the community often associated with BSC meme coins?

AIt refers to a meme coin model on BSC where projects were believed to only find success if they were related to or endorsed by Binance executives like CZ and He Yi, often by 'extracting keywords' from their social media posts.

QHow did CZ and He Yi publicly express their stance on 'keyword extraction meme' coins?

ACZ stated that while he likes meme coins, buying ones created by extracting keywords from his tweets will almost certainly lead to losses and he does not recommend it. He Yi was more direct, stating she does not need meme coins based on her posts for pleasure and advised the community to focus on real development.

QWhat evidence suggests that Binance is being cautious to avoid sparking new 'keyword extraction' meme coins?

AThe official Binance Chinese account posted an announcement about a new meme product feature but heavily pixelated the text to prevent the community from finding angles to create new meme coins based on the post.

QWhat does the success of the BSC 'memes' coin in this event potentially signal for the future of BSC meme coins?

AThe event, coupled with the executives' statements, suggests a potential shift away from the old 'Saint Edict Mode.' The success of a meme coin not directly tied to Binance executives might indicate the arrival of a new, more community-driven 'BSC 3.0' era for memes.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit12m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit12m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit31m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit31m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit40m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片