Venice Token climbs to $7 – Will VVV clear THIS supply zone?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Venice Token (VVV) surged 14.55% to reach $7.06, supported by an 83.5% increase in trading volume to $45.42M. The price is now testing a key resistance level at $7.20, a historically significant supply zone. Technical indicators show a bullish structure with higher lows and a positive MACD crossover, suggesting potential for further upward movement. However, recent exchange inflows of $931.21K could introduce selling pressure. Short liquidations of $85.05K have reduced immediate downside pressure, but the market breakout depends on whether demand can absorb the increased supply near resistance.

Venice Token [VVV] climbed to $7.06 after a 14.55% daily gain, backed by rising participation and volume expansion.

Price approached a critical supply zone, keeping focus on whether buyers could extend the move.

Trading Volume rose 83.5% to $45.42M, reflecting stronger engagement behind the rally. However, the move neared a region that historically capped upside.

This left VVV at a key decision point, where structure and activity needed to align for continuation.

Can higher lows break resistance?

VVV formed a series of higher lows along an ascending trendline, keeping the broader structure intact.

Price compressed below the $7.20 resistance while holding above the $5.75 support. This structure showed buyers stepping in at higher levels, reinforcing upward pressure.

Even so, repeated resistance tests signaled supply remained active in this zone.

As price tightened near the upper boundary, the structure pointed toward a potential expansion. If the breakout holds, trendline support could drive continuation beyond resistance.

On top of that, MACD crossed above the signal line, with the histogram turning positive. This shift indicated strengthening bullish momentum behind the move.

Source: TradingView

Do VVV inflows signal selling pressure?

Spot Netflows have turned positive, with $931.21K in inflows recorded, marking a shift from prior outflow dominance.

This transition suggests that tokens are moving back onto exchanges, which introduces potential sell-side liquidity.

However, the timing of these inflows coincides with price testing resistance, which often reflects positioning adjustments rather than immediate distribution.

Exchange deposits increase available supply, yet they do not always translate into instant selling pressure.

As price holds near the upper range, these inflows create a layer of caution. The market now watches whether this added liquidity slows the rally or simply accompanies continued upward movement.

Source: CoinGlass

Short squeeze reshapes positioning

Liquidation data showed $85.05K in short liquidations versus $17.92K in long liquidations. This imbalance indicated that bearish positions faced stronger pressure.

That move aligned with a leverage reset, removing downside bets from the market.

When shorts unwind, forced buying can support the price and reduce selling pressure.

However, this also reduced immediate squeeze potential after weaker shorts exited. The liquidation profile suggested the market cleared fragile bearish positions.

As a result, price faced less resistance from leveraged downside pressure.

Source: CoinGlass

Can VVV sustain breakout?

VVV tested resistance as structure, indicators, and positioning aligned toward continuation.

Higher lows supported the trend, while MACD confirmed sustained momentum. Short liquidations reduced bearish pressure, keeping the path upward less contested.

Even so, rising exchange inflows introduced supply near resistance. If demand absorbed this supply, VVV could attempt a breakout beyond $7.20.


Final Summary

  • Venice Token [VVV] rose to $7.06, backed by a 14.55% daily gain and an 83.5% jump in Trading Volume.
  • Price approached the $7.20 resistance zone, a key level that previously capped upside.

Related Questions

QWhat was the daily percentage gain that pushed Venice Token (VVV) to $7.06?

AThe daily gain was 14.55%.

QWhat is the critical resistance level that VVV price is approaching according to the article?

AThe critical resistance level is $7.20.

QHow much did the trading volume increase, and what was the new volume figure?

ATrading volume rose by 83.5% to $45.42 million.

QWhat technical indicator showed strengthening bullish momentum with a positive histogram?

AThe MACD indicator crossed above the signal line with a positive histogram, indicating strengthening bullish momentum.

QWhat does the shift to positive Spot Netflows of $931.21K suggest about token movement?

AThe positive Spot Netflows suggest that tokens are moving back onto exchanges, which introduces potential sell-side liquidity.

Related Reads

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit30m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit30m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手53m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手53m ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy GAIN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing GriffinAI (GAIN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy GriffinAI (GAIN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your GriffinAI (GAIN)After purchasing your GriffinAI (GAIN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade GriffinAI (GAIN)Easily trade GriffinAI (GAIN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.09.24Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy GAIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of GAIN (GAIN) are presented below.

活动图片