VC Investment Trends Shift: Public Chains and AI Cool Down; Prediction and Payment Take the Lead

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-12-27Last updated on 2025-12-27

Abstract

Venture capital investment in the crypto sector is shifting significantly, moving away from previously dominant areas like Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains and AI projects. According to recent data, out of 73 projects that raised over $10 million in the past three months, almost none were new public chains. Similarly, AI × Web3 sector saw only two major raises, totaling $22.8 million. Instead, prediction markets and payment systems are now attracting substantial capital. Prediction platforms Polymarket and Kalshi alone secured over $3.15 billion, driven by Polymarket’s accurate election forecasts and growing user engagement. The payment and banking sector raised nearly $1.3 billion, with companies like Ripple Labs and Rapyd leading large rounds. Stablecoin transaction volumes now rival Visa, highlighting the sector’s expansion. Real World Assets (RWA) are also gaining traction, with over $850 million raised—led by Figure’s $787.5 million IPO. Tokenized assets on-chain now exceed $36 billion. Additionally, user-friendly infrastructure projects, such as simplified wallets and onboarding tools, are receiving significant investment to attract mainstream adoption. While DeFi remains active with around $740 million in funding, it no longer dominates VC attention. The trend indicates a clear pivot toward applications with real-world use cases and revenue potential over pure infrastructure.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | jk

The cryptocurrency venture capital market is undergoing a quiet transformation. In DefiLlama's latest funding data, among the 73 projects that completed financings exceeding $10 million in the past three months, there are almost no Layer 1 or Layer 2 public chains to be found. The public chain sector, once considered the "holy grail," has now nearly disappeared. Meanwhile, prediction markets, payment systems, RWA (Real World Assets), and infrastructure targeting ordinary users are attracting massive capital inflows.

L1, L2 Boom Ends, Large AI Financings Also Nearly Extinguished

Looking back at the peak of the 2021-2022 bull market, new public chains like Solana, Avalanche, and Fantom routinely raised hundreds of millions of dollars, with investors vying to bet on "Ethereum killers." However, three years later, the market landscape has fundamentally changed.

From Movement, Story, to this year's Berachain and Monad, the era of large public chain financings is no longer the norm.

According to data from The Block, the overall funding for blockchain networks (including L1 and L2) in 2024 was approximately $1.8 billion. While still an important sector, growth has noticeably slowed. According to statistics by user @pgreyy on X, in Q4 2025, aside from Tempo (a new public chain focused solely on payments and backed by Paradigm), no new L1 or L2 managed to secure an investment exceeding $10 million.

Can a public chain without a $10 million investment still fulfill the role of a "world computer" or an "Ethereum killer"?

Investors have realized that the market doesn't need more "high-performance public chains"; it needs applications that can bring real users and real revenue. Crypto influencer @sjdedic stated his conclusion on X: "No one cares about infrastructure anymore. The spotlight has shifted to the application layer—consumer-facing products and real use cases. Those L1s stuck in the 'medium intelligence trap,' focusing only on technology while ignoring everything else, are in trouble." He further predicted: "I wouldn't be surprised to see applications valued at tens of billions of dollars in the coming years, while L1 tokens gradually lose market share and slowly become irrelevant."

Similarly, although AI is the hottest tech concept of 2025, among the crypto projects that raised over $10 million in the past three months, only two belong to the AI sector: Inference secured an $11.8 million seed round, and TAO Synergies Inc completed a $11 million private equity round, totaling just $22.8 million. Even removing the $10 million threshold, there are only 9. This number is a drop in the bucket compared to Web2. For comparison, a mid-sized payment company, Coinflow, raised a single round of $25 million.

Who would have thought that just a year later, not only has the spectacle of Virtuals vs. ai16z become彻底的历史 (thoroughly history), but the entire AI x Web3 sector has also cooled down.

Rise of Emerging Sectors

Prediction Markets: From Fringe to Mainstream

Prediction markets are undoubtedly the dark horse of 2025 and the most prominent sector in this round of data. Polymarket and Kalshi alone attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, dominating the entire list. Polymarket generated over $3.3 billion in trading volume during the 2024 US election period, and its predictions were even more accurate than traditional polling agencies. In October 2025, the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)—the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange—announced a massive $2 billion investment in Polymarket, pushing its valuation to $8-9 billion. Polymarket had also completed a $150 million funding round earlier.

Meanwhile, Kalshi not only completed a $1 billion Series E round but also secured a $300 million Series D round for its DeFi business, with investors including Sequoia, a16z, and Paradigm.

Payments & Banking: The Stablecoin "Super Cycle"

So who picked up the heat from public chain funding? The answer is undoubtedly the payments/banking sector.

Judging by the funding data, the payments sector raised nearly $1.3 billion, covering a complete ecosystem from underlying infrastructure to consumer applications. In 2025, stablecoin circulation grew by approximately $30 billion since the start of the year, with monthly transaction volumes exceeding $1 trillion, now comparable to Visa's scale.

Ripple Labs secured a $50 million strategic investment, and Rapyd completed a $50 million Series F round. These two companies alone raised $100 million, accounting for the majority of the payments sector. While giant players continue to lead, new digital banks, interbank B2B services, and financial services are also active. Singapore's Pave Bank, France's digital bank Deblock, Switzerland's Future Holdings, and the Netherlands' Amdax all received over $20 million in funding.

It's hard to imagine that in 2019, VC investment in the stablecoin field alone was less than $50 million.

RWA: Bridging Virtual and Real

Real World Asset tokenization (RWA) is moving from the experimental phase to scaled application. Looking at the funding data, Figure led the entire RWA sector with an IPO size of $787.5 million. Combined with its additional $25 million funding, one company contributed over 95% of the RWA sector's funding. RWA compliance company Satschel secured a $15 million equity round, on-chain stock trading infrastructure company Block Street completed an $11.5 million round, bringing the total RWA sector funding to over $85 million.

According to data from RWA.xyz, on-chain tokenized assets exceed $36 billion. Among them, the market cap of tokenized gold grew from $1 billion to over $3.27 billion in 2025, a 227% increase.

Simultaneously, traditional asset management giants like BlackRock, Apollo, and Franklin Templeton are actively tokenizing institutional-grade products. Private equity fund managers are beginning to adopt blockchain to represent ownership of traditional assets, enabling fractional ownership and instant settlement.

Another focus for VCs is infrastructure projects that can reach ordinary users. The characteristic of these projects is lowering the barrier to using cryptocurrency, allowing non-crypto-native users to easily access blockchain services. Directions like wallet abstraction, social logins, and fiat on/off ramps are attracting investment. The U card RedotPay received a $47 million strategic investment, investment company Finary completed a $29.4 million Series A, and self-custody company Bron secured a $15 million seed round. These projects are lowering the threshold for users to use cryptocurrency, paving the way for the next wave of user growth.

DeFi: Steady Recovery

DeFi showed steady performance in this funding round, raising a total of approximately $74 million. However, compared to the prediction markets and payments sectors, the scale of individual financings was significantly smaller. Decentralized exchange Flying Tulip became the funding champion among pure DeFi projects with a $20 million seed round. Lighter secured $68 million, and Jito received a $50 million strategic investment. The 2025 funding data reflects a more cautious valuation attitude from VCs towards the DeFi sector. According to The Block's data, the DeFi sector completed over 530 financings in 2024; 2025 has clearly not reached that scale.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, which sectors have seen a significant decline in VC funding for large-scale projects (over $10 million) in the past three months?

AThe article states that Layer 1 and Layer 2 public blockchains have nearly disappeared from large funding rounds. The AI x Web3 sector has also seen a significant cooling, with only two AI projects raising over $10 million in that period.

QWhat are the two prediction market companies mentioned that collectively raised over $3.15 billion, and what was a key event that demonstrated their utility?

AThe two prediction market companies are Polymarket and Kalshi. A key event demonstrating their utility was the 2024 U.S. presidential election, during which Polymarket processed over $3.3 billion in trading volume and its predictions were more accurate than traditional polling agencies.

QHow does the current scale of stablecoin transaction volume compare to a major traditional payment network, and which payment companies received the largest investments?

AThe monthly transaction volume of stablecoins has surpassed $1 trillion, which is comparable to the transaction scale of Visa. The payment companies that received the largest investments were Ripple Labs ($500 million strategic investment) and Rapyd ($500 million Series F round).

QWhat does RWA stand for, and which company in this sector had a major liquidity event mentioned in the article?

ARWA stands for Real World Assets. The company Figure had a major liquidity event, leading the sector with an IPO that raised $787.5 million, in addition to another $25 million in funding.

QWhat shift in investor focus does the crypto influencer @sjdedic describe, and what is the 'medium IQ trap' he references?

A@sjdedic describes a shift in investor focus from infrastructure to the application layer—consumer-facing products and real-use cases. The 'medium IQ trap' refers to L1 blockchains that are overly focused on technical aspects while ignoring other crucial elements like user adoption and real revenue, causing them to fall into困境 (difficulties).

Related Reads

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbit6m ago

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbit6m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报18m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报18m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手23m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手23m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手36m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手36m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片