US Probes Crypto Exchanges For Suspected Sanctions Violations Linked To Iran

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

U.S. authorities are investigating whether cryptocurrency exchanges have enabled Iranian entities to bypass international sanctions, following a surge in crypto activity linked to Iran. Blockchain data indicates that transaction volumes reached an estimated $8–10 billion over the past year, with both government-linked actors and everyday users increasingly turning to digital assets. Analysts report record inflows into Iranian wallets, reaching $7.8 billion in 2025. The Treasury Department is examining if platforms facilitated sanctions evasion, including moving money offshore or accessing hard currency. Iran’s largest exchange, Nobitex, acknowledged some users transfer funds internationally but stated it employs monitoring systems to detect suspicious activity. Data also shows a gradual movement of assets out of Iranian exchanges, often into self-custodied wallets, rather than abrupt capital flight.

Crypto activity in Iran has expanded rapidly over the past year, drawing renewed attention from US authorities who are now examining whether certain digital asset platforms may have played a role in helping Iranian officials and state‐linked actors bypass international sanctions.

Rising Iran Crypto Volumes

According to a blockchain researcher cited by Reuters, cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran surged to an estimated range of $8 billion to $10 billion over the past year, as both government‐connected entities and everyday users increasingly turned to digital assets.

Estimates from blockchain analytics firms TRM Labs and Chainalysis show that crypto usage in Iran has grown steadily despite mounting restrictions on the country’s access to the global financial system.

TRM Labs estimates that crypto activity in Iran reached roughly $10 billion last year, compared with $11.4 billion in 2024. Chainalysis reported similar growth, saying wallets linked to Iran received a record $7.8 billion in 2025, up from $7.4 billion in 2024 and $3.17 billion in 2023.

US authorities are now investigating if crypto platforms, which weren’t mentioned in the report, have enabled sanctioned Iranian organizations to move money offshore, access hard cash, or pay for items in ways that circumvent sanctions.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, said the US Treasury is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion. Redbord said he had direct knowledge of the Treasury Department’s concerns.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment directly on the investigation but pointed Reuters to a statement issued in September announcing new measures targeting so‐called “shadow banking” networks that support Iran, including those that officials say rely on cryptocurrencies to avoid sanctions.

What Blockchain Data Shows

Inside Iran, crypto adoption has spread widely among the public. Nobitex, the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, told Reuters that industry estimates suggest around 15 million Iranians have some level of exposure to digital assets.

The exchange said it has approximately 11 million customers, with most activity coming from retail users and smaller investors. According to Nobitex, many Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

Data from analytics firm Nansen suggests that some Iranian users moved funds out of Nobitex during 2025. The firm said balances of major cryptocurrencies on the exchange fell sharply from a peak reached around the middle of the year.

Analyst Nicolai Sondergaard said the data indicates that digital assets in Iran have increasingly served as a gradual exit channel rather than a one‐time flight of capital. According to Nansen’s analysis, funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but instead moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025.

Nobitex acknowledged that some customers may use digital assets to move funds internationally, but said it does not track the final destination or purpose of those transactions.

The exchange stated that it employs robust monitoring systems designed to detect potentially suspicious activity and protect user assets. It also said concerns about asset safety following the June hacking incident may have influenced user behavior.

In many cases, Nobitex explained, customers transferred assets to self‐custodied wallets rather than directly to overseas exchanges. The exchange said this approach allows users to secure their holdings temporarily while assessing risks and deciding whether to redeposit funds later.

The 1-D chart shows the drop in the total crypto market cap below $2.6 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the estimated range of cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran over the past year, as cited in the article?

AThe estimated range is $8 billion to $10 billion.

QWhich two blockchain analytics firms provided data showing the growth of crypto usage in Iran?

ATRM Labs and Chainalysis.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason many Iranians use cryptocurrency, as stated by the Nobitex exchange?

AMany Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

QWhat US government department is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion, according to Ari Redbord of TRM Labs?

AThe US Treasury Department.

QWhat did data from analytics firm Nansen suggest about the movement of funds from the Nobitex exchange in 2025?

AThe data suggested that funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025, serving as a gradual exit channel.

Related Reads

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1h ago

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片