Up Over 130% in a Month, Steadily Among Top Ethereum Blob Consumers—How Real is World Chain's Growth?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-22Last updated on 2026-06-22

Abstract

World Chain, the Layer-2 blockchain developed by the Worldcoin project, has demonstrated significant recent growth despite a generally competitive and challenging L2 landscape. Its native token, WLD, surged over 130% in a month, driven by institutional holdings (notably from Eightco Holdings), increased trading activity from promotional campaigns, and a key upcoming reduction in daily token unlocks starting July 2026. Concurrently, World Chain's on-chain activity soared, with active addresses growing nearly 650% in 30 days and its Total Value Secured (TVS) surpassing $610 million, primarily from bridge inflows. However, its decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem remains nascent, with a total value locked (TVL) of only ~$40 million largely concentrated in a single protocol. A standout metric is World Chain's high data usage: it has become the second-largest consumer of Ethereum Blobs (data storage units), trailing only Base. This indicates substantial real-user transaction demand, likely fueled by Worldcoin's identity verification and reward distribution activities on its dedicated chain. While its current growth is fueled by token momentum and bridge capital, World Chain's long-term success depends on converting this activity into a sustainable, diverse on-chain economy.

Author: Nancy, PANews

Since Vitalik reframed the Layer2 roadmap this year, the survival competition in the L2 track has become increasingly brutal. Star L2s like Base, Arbitrum, and OP Mainnet continue to vie for market attention and liquidity, while numerous mid-to-long-tail and emerging L2s have become "ghost towns," with many projects even forced to make drastic cuts to survive.

Amid this growing L2 fragmentation, World Chain has carved out a relatively independent growth trajectory. Although its on-chain ecosystem applications remain sparse, real user activity drives high-frequency interaction demand. Concurrently, riding the AI wave, WLD has recently experienced a relatively independent upward trend.

Behind the 130%+ Monthly Surge: Why is WLD on an Independent Run?

As the investment fervor in the AI sector continues to heat up, Worldcoin has become a target for market capital. CoinGecko data shows that WLD has surged 136.1% over the past 30 days, significantly outperforming most mainstream crypto assets.

This rally is primarily driven by a confluence of multiple expectations and capital inflows.

On one hand, substantial institutional holdings have boosted market confidence. Nasdaq-listed company Eightco Holdings publicly holds approximately 283 million WLD (about 8.4% of the circulating supply), incorporating it into its treasury asset allocation. Additionally, as the company holds indirect equity in OpenAI (an investment of around $90 million), it has amplified the market's imagination regarding the value of its token holdings.

On the other hand, incentive activities have stimulated WLD's trading activity. At the end of last month, Oku Trade integrated into the World App and launched a WLD trading competition, directly incentivizing user participation. Dune data shows that WLD's daily trading volume on DEXs once exceeded $11 million, compared to a long-term average of several hundred thousand dollars, representing a multiplier increase in volume.

A more critical driving factor comes from expectations of improvements in tokenomics. According to the latest adjustment plan, starting July 24, 2026, the daily WLD unlock volume will decrease from approximately 5.1 million to about 2.9 million tokens, a reduction of about 43%. Community unlocks will drop from 3.2 million to 1.6 million (50% decrease), while team and investor unlocks will decrease from 1.9 million to 1.3 million tokens per day (32% decrease). This adjustment is widely interpreted by the market as a significant alleviation of medium-to-long-term supply pressure, helping to dampen expectations of continuous sell-side pressure.

Furthermore, as expectations for the listing of AI giant OpenAI continue to heat up, the market fervor for the AI narrative has spilled over. As a crypto project co-founded by its figurehead Sam Altman, market attention on Worldcoin has intensified, further driving speculative capital inflows.

Soaring On-Chain Activity, Growth Dependent on Bridge Inflows

Alongside the rising token price, on-chain activity on World Chain is also surging.

In terms of capital inflows, this growth phase is primarily fueled by bridged TVL. According to L2BEAT data, World Chain's Total Value Secured (TVS) now exceeds $610 million, representing an increase of about 122.6% over the past 30 days. Standard bridge asset inflows dominate this, amounting to approximately $557 million, a 118.4% month-on-month increase, constituting the main source of recent capital expansion.

Growing alongside the capital flow is its on-chain activity. GrowThePie data shows that over the past 30 days, World Chain's daily active addresses have skyrocketed by 649%. In comparison, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum One, Celo, and others saw limited growth during the same period, with some even experiencing negative growth.

However, World Chain's on-chain ecosystem has not seen large-scale expansion. Compared to Base, which leverages Coinbase's traffic, or Arbitrum, which boasts a mature DeFi ecosystem, World Chain remains in the early stages of ecosystem development, lacking native protocols with network effects and high-frequency use cases.

DeFiLlama data shows that as of June 22, World Chain's TVL is only about $40.42 million, a scale incomparable to other leading L2s. Although it has nearly doubled over the past 30 days, the incremental liquidity is mainly concentrated in Morpho Blue-related vaults, with this protocol accounting for about 93% of World Chain's TVL.

In other words, a significant portion of the bridged capital remains in the form of idle assets, not effectively converted into DeFi lending, DEX trading, or complex application interactions. The depth of on-chain capital utilization and the efficiency of retention and conversion remain limited.

Second Only to Base, World Chain Becomes a Major Blob Consumer

Despite the lack of external applications, its unique positioning as Worldcoin's dedicated L2 and tens of millions of real user activities mean large-scale internal transactions are continuously driving up World Chain's Blob consumption, making it a high-frequency L2.

Blobs are primarily used by Layer 2 Rollups to publish transaction data to the mainnet at extremely low cost, achieving data availability. Since the Dencun upgrade in March 2024, the Ethereum mainnet has cumulatively submitted over 19.53 million Blobs. Among numerous Layer 2s, World Chain has grown into the second-largest Blob consumer, its strong performance even surpassing established L2s like Arbitrum.

According to the latest Dune Analytics statistics, since its launch in June 2025, World Chain has cumulatively submitted over 2.63 million Blobs to Ethereum, firmly placing it among the top networks, second only to the leading Base. In the past 24 hours, it has averaged 106 Blob submissions per hour, equivalent to writing about 13.3MB of data to Ethereum per hour, with a Blob fill rate as high as 99%, leading most L2s in data packaging efficiency.

In terms of cost and operational efficiency, World Chain also demonstrates strong competitiveness. Over the past 3 days, its data availability (DA) fees amounted to about $304, with cumulative historical fees exceeding $2 million, proving more efficient compared to established L2s like Base (cumulative ~$6.45 million) and Arbitrum (cumulative ~$3.51 million). Simultaneously, it submits batches to Ethereum on average every 3 minutes and 45 seconds, with each submission transaction averaging 3 Blobs, indicating a high frequency of on-chain interactions.

Judging by the scale of data inflow, World Chain quickly ascended to the top tier shortly after launch and has maintained a leading position. As of June 15, its Blob data inflow accounted for 12.6% of the total network volume, second only to Base's 43.3%, solidifying its second-place standing. Mainstream L2s like Arbitrum One, Soneium, OP Mainnet, and Unichain all rank behind it.

While most L2s grapple with growth anxiety, World Chain's rise to the forefront of Blob consumption is not only due to the cost and throughput advantages afforded by its underlying OP Stack architecture, enabling it to handle on-chain activities more efficiently. More importantly, the migration of tens of millions of real World ID users to its dedicated chain, driven by scenarios like identity verification, subsidized Gas, and reward claims, generates sustained high-frequency transaction demand. This allows it to maintain vigorous data demand and Blob consumption even in the absence of a mature ecosystem.

Looking at a longer cycle, what truly determines the long-term development of an L2 is not short-term capital and trading hype. World Chain must effectively convert externally流入的资产 into on-chain liquidity and sustainable economic activities to evolve from a frequently used L2 into a mature network with a self-sustaining ecosystem.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the main factors driving WLD's significant price increase of over 130% in the past month?

AThe price surge is driven by multiple factors: institutional holdings (like Eightco Holdings holding ~284M WLD), incentive activities (e.g., Oku Trade integration boosting DEX volume), an expected improvement in tokenomics (a ~43% reduction in daily unlocks starting July 24, 2026), and heightened market interest in AI narratives linked to Sam Altman and OpenAI.

QHow has the on-chain activity of World Chain changed recently, and what is the primary source of its TVL growth?

AWorld Chain's on-chain activity has surged significantly, with active daily addresses increasing by 649% in the past 30 days. Its Total Value Secured (TVS) grew by about 122.6% to over $610 million, primarily driven by standard bridge inflows, which account for approximately $557 million of the TVL.

QWhat is the current state of World Chain's DeFi ecosystem compared to other major L2s?

AWorld Chain's DeFi ecosystem remains underdeveloped compared to L2s like Base or Arbitrum. Its total TVL is only about $40.42 million, with ~93% concentrated in Morpho Blue vaults. Most bridged assets are idle and have not been effectively converted into active DeFi usage such as lending or DEX trading.

QWhat is Blob consumption, and why is World Chain considered a major consumer on Ethereum?

ABlobs are used by Layer 2 Rollups to post transaction data to the Ethereum mainnet for data availability at low cost. World Chain is the second-largest Blob consumer on Ethereum, just after Base. Since its launch, it has submitted over 2.63 million Blobs, accounting for 12.6% of the network's total Blob data inflow, due to high-frequency transactions from millions of World ID users.

QWhat challenges does World Chain face for its long-term development despite its current high usage?

AThe key long-term challenge for World Chain is transforming externally bridged assets and high transaction frequency into a sustainable on-chain economy with deeper liquidity and diverse economic activities. It needs to move beyond being just a high-usage L2 driven by internal user actions (like identity verification and rewards) and build a robust, self-sustaining ecosystem with more native applications.

Related Reads

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight News2m ago

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight News2m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News59m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News59m ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片