Treasury Urges Agreement Between Crypto Firms and Banks to Advance CLARITY Act

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is urging crypto firms, banks, and lawmakers to compromise to advance the stalled Clarity Act. With the bill stuck in the Senate, he emphasized that waiting for a perfect law is unrealistic and risks U.S. innovation and global crypto leadership. This push comes ahead of a crucial White House meeting. A key debate centers on whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest. Banks fear this could drain deposits and weaken the traditional system, while crypto firms argue yield is essential for competition. Another contentious issue is crypto firms' limited access to the Federal Reserve's payment system. If no agreement is reached, lawmakers may delay the vote again, creating market uncertainty, despite former President Trump's goal of making the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world."

Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is pushing the crypto firm, banks, and lawmakers to stop fighting and find a compromise so that the Clarity Act can be moved forward. His statements have come right before the key White House meeting.

Right now, the bill has been stuck in the Senate, and crypto firms and banks met last week but failed to agree. So another meeting is scheduled today to try again. Bessent made it clear that waiting for the perfect law is not realistic, and it could create uncertainty and slow innovation in the U.S.

Scott Bessent’s reply to Brian Armstrong’s statement

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has argued that it may be better not to have a bill instead of passing the bill that creates the problem. Scott disagrees with his statements, and he believes that some regulations are better than none. He warned that a few groups refusing to compromise could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader.

Key issue for the Debate

One of the most sensitive issues is whether the stablecoin companies pay users interest. Banks worry that if the stablecoins offer yield, then people would start moving money out of the bank deposit, and this could weaken the traditional banking system. On the other hand, crypto companies argue that yield helps them to compete, and users expect returns similar to those of savings products. Another topic is limited access for the crypto firms to the payment system run by the Federal Reserve. This created more tension between the crypto firms and banks.

Today’s meeting is so crucial and could decide whether the bill moves forward and how stablecoins will work in the U.S. with clearer operating rules for the companies. If no agreement is reached, then the lawmakers may delay the vote again. The analyst says that this would affect the market and create uncertainty. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that he wants the nation to be the “crypto capital of the world.”

Highlighted Crypto News:

Telegram Moves Toward Built-In Crypto Payments With TON Pay Launch

TagsClarity ACTCrypto

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the Treasury Secretary's push for compromise between crypto firms and banks?

AThe Treasury Secretary is pushing for compromise to advance the CLARITY Act, which has been stuck in the Senate, to prevent uncertainty and avoid slowing innovation in the U.S. crypto sector.

QHow does Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's view differ from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's regarding the proposed legislation?

AScott Bessent believes some regulation is better than none and warns that refusing to pass a bill could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader, while Brian Armstrong argues it may be better to have no bill than to pass a problematic one.

QWhat is one key issue causing debate between banks and crypto companies regarding stablecoins?

AA key issue is whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest, with banks worrying this could draw deposits away from traditional banks and weaken the banking system, while crypto firms argue yield helps them compete and meet user expectations.

QWhy is the meeting mentioned in the article considered crucial?

AThe meeting is crucial because it could determine whether the CLARITY Act moves forward and establish clearer operating rules for stablecoins in the U.S.; failure to reach an agreement may lead to further delays in voting and create market uncertainty.

QWhat has been President Donald Trump's stated goal regarding cryptocurrency in the U.S.?

APresident Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that he wants the United States to become the 'crypto capital of the world.'

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit7m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit7m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit20m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片