‘Too many issues’- Coinbase CEO withdraws support for CLARITY Act

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Coinbase has withdrawn its support for the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill, leading the Senate Banking Committee to postpone its markup. CEO Brian Armstrong stated the current version has "too many issues" and is "bad for the sector," preferring no bill over a bad one. Key objections include bans on tokenized equities, stablecoin rewards, and privacy-limiting DeFi restrictions. In response, Chairman Tim Scott delayed the session to allow further bipartisan negotiations. The market's odds of the bill passing this year fell to 52%, down from 80%, reflecting increased uncertainty. Senator Elizabeth Warren also proposed 35 stricter amendments, seen as favorable to traditional banks.

Coinbase has withdrawn its support for the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, forcing the Senate Banking Committee to postpone the planned markup.

In a statement, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the draft, which was scheduled for markup, had “too many issues” and was “bad” for the sector.

He highlighted the ban on tokenized equities, stablecoin rewards, and the prohibition of DeFi that would limit privacy as key deal breakers.

“This version (draft) would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully, we can all get to a better draft.”

He added that crypto needs to be treated on a “level playing field with the rest of financial services.”

Senate Banking Committee postpones markup

Coinbase’s move reportedly derailed the markup scheduled for the 15th of January. In response, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) postponed the session to allow bipartisan negotiations to continue.

Scott added,

“I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith.”

However, unlike the Senate Agriculture Committee, which also pushed its markup timeline to the last week of January, the Banking Committee didn’t share a new schedule as of press time.

Whether the Banking committee will align with the Agriculture’s schedule was unclear.

Meanwhile, Galaxy Head of Research Alex Thorn noted that Senator Elizabeth Warren filed 35 amendments to the crypto bill. These include stricter DeFi oversight and a proposed ban on tokenized stocks.

Taken together, the changes were largely viewed as a win for the banks, who had successfully pushed for limiting stablecoin rewards in the draft.

Market is 50/50 on the CLARITY Act

These last-minute amendments further diluted the bill, according to crypto supporters. And with the temporary pause on the bill momentum, the market was nearly 50/50 on the chance of it being passed into law this year.

At the time of writing, Polymarket showed a 52% chance of the bill becoming law.

That figure was down from nearly 80% just two days earlier. It reflects growing uncertainty, especially if unresolved issues spill into the U.S. election cycle.


Final Thoughts

  • The Senate Banking Committee has joined its Agriculture colleagues in postponing the markup of the crypto market structure bill.
  • Coinbase CEO said the industry would “rather have no bill than a bad bill.”

Related Questions

QWhy did Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated the draft had 'too many issues' and was 'bad' for the crypto sector, citing the ban on tokenized equities, stablecoin rewards, and the prohibition of DeFi that would limit privacy as key deal breakers.

QWhat was the immediate consequence of Coinbase's withdrawal of support?

AThe Senate Banking Committee postponed the planned markup session for the CLARITY Act that was scheduled for January 15th.

QAccording to the article, who is seen as the main beneficiary of the recent amendments to the bill?

AThe changes were largely viewed as a win for the banks, who had successfully pushed for limiting stablecoin rewards in the draft.

QWhat did Senator Elizabeth Warren propose in her amendments to the crypto bill?

ASenator Elizabeth Warren filed 35 amendments, which included stricter DeFi oversight and a proposed ban on tokenized stocks.

QWhat does the current market prediction (on Polymarket) indicate about the bill's chance of becoming law?

AAt the time of writing, Polymarket showed a 52% chance of the bill becoming law, down from nearly 80% just two days earlier, reflecting growing uncertainty.

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit25m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit25m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit38m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit38m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片