The Most Centralized Giant in the Crypto World Starts Selling the 'Decentralized AI' Dream

比推Published on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

Tether, the highly centralized issuer of the USDT stablecoin, reported $13 billion in profit in 2024—far exceeding the combined revenues and losses of major AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic. With only 150 employees, Tether earns primarily by investing user funds in U.S. Treasury bonds, profiting from the interest without paying users any yield. Now, Tether is aggressively investing in AI. It loaned over $600 million to Northern Data, Europe’s largest GPU cloud provider with over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs. It also released QVAC Genesis, a massive open-source AI training dataset, and acquired Blackrock Neurotech, a brain-computer interface company, for $200 million. Total AI-related investments approach $1 billion, with potential additional deals in robotics sector. Despite its centralized control over USDT reserves and lack of external audits, Tether promotes a “decentralized AI” vision—advocating for local AI operation and individual data ownership. Critics find this ironic, given Tether’s opaque governance. Tether’s move into AI may stem from concerns over declining Treasury yields and a desire to position itself as a tech innovator. Unlike AI startups burning billions without clear profitability, Tether uses stablecoin profits to fund speculative AI bets—insulating itself from sector risks while gaining influence. The article suggests that in 2026, the best business model in AI might be not doing AI at all, but rather funding it with profits from a separate, lucrative ve...

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: The AI Industry Welcomes a Cash-Rich Tether


Tether earned $13 billion in 2024.

You might not have a clear idea of this number. Let me put it another way: OpenAI had $3.7 billion in revenue in 2024 but lost $5 billion. Anthropic had $1 billion in revenue and also lost $5 billion.

The combined losses of these two legitimate AI companies are still less than what Tether earned in a year.

Tether has 150 employees, while OpenAI has over 3,000. The per capita output difference is roughly:

60 times.

How does Tether make money? When you buy 1 USDT, they take $1 and use it to buy U.S. Treasury bonds. The interest from the bonds goes to them, not you.

The essence of this business is that Tether doesn't pay interest. Banks pay interest on savings, but Tether doesn't. You hold USDT, and you get zero interest. They use your money to buy U.S. Treasury bonds and earned $7 billion in interest in 2024 alone.

150 people managing over $130 billion in Treasury bonds, doing nothing, and the interest just rolls in.

Who wouldn't want to lie back with a business like this?

But with so much money, it has to be spent. Tether has chosen a direction:

AI.

And they’re not just casually investing in a few projects to tick a box.

First, computing power.

Running AI requires GPUs—the more, the better, and the more expensive, the better. Tether loaned over $600 million to a German company called Northern Data.

What does this company do?

It’s Europe’s largest GPU cloud service provider. They have over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs—the same ones OpenAI used to train GPT, each costing $20,000 to $30,000.

The cluster formed by these GPUs ranks 26th in the global TOP500 supercomputer list. With this $600 million investment, Tether essentially bought an AI training base in Europe.

Next, data.

Training AI requires feeding it data. Last week, Tether released a dataset called QVAC Genesis, covering 19 disciplines including mathematics, physics, chemistry, and computer science. They claim it’s the world’s largest open-source AI training dataset.

Keep in mind that OpenAI and Anthropic’s training data are not public. Tether is releasing theirs for free, available to anyone.

Then comes the even more sci-fi part.

In April 2024, Tether spent $200 million to acquire a company called Blackrock Neurotech. The name includes "Blackrock," but it has no relation to the asset management giant BlackRock.

This company works on brain-computer interfaces. They implant chips into human brains, allowing paralyzed individuals to type with their thoughts, control wheelchairs, and operate robotic arms. It sounds like science fiction, but they’ve been doing it since 2008—eight years before Musk’s Neuralink.

How impressive is this company?

Out of the 35 people worldwide who have brain-computer interface chips implanted, 31 use Blackrock’s technology. In 2016, a fully paralyzed patient used their device to control a robotic arm and fist-bump Obama. The chip implanted in the sensory cortex allowed him to "feel" the president’s hand.

Last year, this brain-computer interface company enabled an ALS patient to "speak" again. The chip in his brain translated his thoughts into speech at a rate of 62 words per minute.

Tether spent $200 million to become the majority shareholder of this company.

Combined, Tether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related fields. Rumor has it they’re also negotiating with a German robotics company, offering $1.2 billion. If that deal goes through, their total investment could reach $2 billion.

What does this mean?

Anthropic raised $3.5 billion in funding in 2024. Tether’s investment alone is almost half of what a top-tier AI company raised in a year.

OpenAI spent $6.7 billion on R&D in the first half of 2025. Tether, with just a fraction of its profits, can play the role of a major investor in the AI world.

Why is a stablecoin company getting into AI?

We think there are two possibilities.

The first is anxiety. The Fed is cutting interest rates, and Treasury yields are falling. In 2024, they earned $7 billion in interest just by lying back. From 2025 onward, it might not be so easy. Even money-printing machines need new stories.

The second is ambition. The whole world is talking about AI—investors, media, politicians. If you say you’re a stablecoin company, no one pays attention. But if you say you’re working on AI, brain-computer interfaces, and humanoid robots, then you’re:

A tech leader.

The most amusing part?

Tether’s slogan for its AI endeavors is "decentralization," "local operation," and "returning intelligence to individuals."

But Tether itself is the most centralized company in the crypto world.

They decide how many coins to issue, how much reserve capital to hold. In ten years of operation, they’ve never been audited. Only they know where users’ money is.

Now, this company wants to teach the world what "decentralized AI" means.

It’s a bit like a casino owner offering classes on how to quit gambling.

Not that it’s impossible.

After all, OpenAI is still losing money and isn’t expected to break even until 2029. Anthropic is in a similar situation, aiming for 2028. Sam Altman is fundraising everywhere, and Dario Amodei is doing the same. The two companies have lost a combined $10 billion and are still telling stories to investors.

Tether doesn’t need to tell stories. The money is already in their pocket.

What’s the biggest challenge in the entire AI industry? The business model.

How to make money? No one knows. When will it make money? No one knows. Can it make money? No one knows.

Tether doesn’t have this problem. Their business model is:

Not doing AI.

They use the money earned from stablecoins to invest in AI. If the investment succeeds, it’s foresight. If it fails, it’s a learning expense. Either way, it doesn’t affect their core business.

Those doing AI are losing money; those not doing AI are making money. Those doing AI are fundraising; those not doing AI are investing.

The best AI business model in 2026 might just be not doing AI.

First, get your money-printing machine in order.


Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7600174

Related Questions

QHow much profit did Tether make in 2024, and how does it compare to major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic?

ATether made a profit of $13 billion in 2024. In comparison, OpenAI had revenue of $3.7 billion but lost $5 billion, while Anthropic had revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion. Combined, the losses of these two major AI companies were less than Tether's profit.

QWhat is Tether's core business model that generates such significant profits?

ATether's core business model involves issuing the USDT stablecoin. When users buy 1 USDT, Tether receives 1 US dollar and uses it to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds. The interest earned on these bonds is kept by Tether, as they do not pay any interest to USDT holders. In 2024, Tether earned $7 billion in interest from this strategy.

QWhat are some key AI-related investments Tether has made, and what is their significance?

ATether has made several significant AI-related investments, including a $600 million+ loan to Northern Data, Europe's largest GPU cloud service provider with over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs. They also released the QVAC Genesis dataset, claimed to be the world's largest open-source AI training data, and acquired Blackrock Neurotech, a brain-computer interface company, for $200 million. Their total AI investments approach $1 billion, with potential additional deals like a $1.2 billion German robotics company.

QWhy is Tether, a centralized stablecoin company, investing in AI and promoting 'decentralized AI'?

ATether is investing in AI likely for two reasons: anxiety over declining U.S. Treasury yields threatening their profit model, and ambition to position themselves as a tech leader in the booming AI field. Despite being a highly centralized company (controlling USDT issuance and reserves without audits), they promote 'decentralized AI' as a strategic narrative to gain relevance and influence in the tech industry.

QWhat ironic contrast does the article highlight about Tether's role in the AI industry?

AThe article highlights the irony that Tether, which profits massively from its stablecoin business without engaging in AI development, is investing in AI while major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are losing billions. Tether doesn't face the AI industry's core problem of finding a sustainable business model; instead, it uses its stablecoin profits to fund AI ventures, making 'not doing AI' a profitable strategy to finance AI investments.

Related Reads

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, discusses the path to AGI and its profound implications in a Sequoia Capital interview. He outlines his lifelong dedication to AI, tracing his journey from game development (e.g., *Theme Park*)—a perfect AI testing ground—to neuroscience and finally founding DeepMind in 2009. He emphasizes the critical lesson of being "5 years, not 50 years, ahead of time" for successful entrepreneurship. Hassabis reiterates DeepMind's two-step mission: first, solve intelligence by building AGI; second, use AGI to tackle other complex problems. He highlights the transformative potential of "AI for Science," particularly in biology where tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized protein folding. He envisions AI-powered simulations drastically shortening drug discovery from years to weeks and enabling personalized medicine. Furthermore, he predicts AI will spawn new scientific disciplines, such as an engineering science for understanding complex AI systems (mechanistic interpretability) and novel fields enabled by high-fidelity simulators for complex systems like economics. He posits a fundamental worldview where information, not just matter or energy, is the essence of the universe, making AI's information-processing core uniquely suited to understanding reality. He defends classical Turing machines as potentially sufficient for modeling complex phenomena, including quantum systems, as demonstrated by AlphaFold. On consciousness, Hassabis suggests first building AGI as a powerful tool, then using it to explore deep philosophical questions. He believes components like self-awareness and temporal continuity are necessary for consciousness but that defining it fully remains an open challenge. He predicts AGI could arrive around 2030 and, once achieved, would be used to probe the deepest questions of science and reality, much as envisioned in David Deutsch's *The Fabric of Reality*.

链捕手9m ago

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

链捕手9m ago

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbit55m ago

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbit55m ago

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手1h ago

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手1h ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

The narrative of tech stocks is increasingly relying on Anthropic. Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has become central to the financial stories of major tech giants. Elon Musk dissolved xAI, merging it into SpaceX as SpaceXAI, and secured an exclusive deal to rent the massive "Colossus 1" supercomputing cluster to Anthropic. In return, Anthropic expressed interest in future space-based compute collaborations. Google and Amazon are also deeply invested. Google plans to invest up to $40 billion and provide significant compute power, while Amazon holds a 15-16% stake. Both companies reported massive quarterly profit surges largely due to valuation gains from their Anthropic holdings. Crucially, Anthropic has committed to multi-billion dollar cloud compute contracts with both Google Cloud and AWS. This creates a clear divide: the "A Camp" (Anthropic-Google-Musk) versus the "O Camp" (OpenAI-Microsoft). The A Camp's strategy intertwines equity, compute orders, and profits, making Anthropic a "systemic financial node." Its performance directly impacts its partners' financials and stock prices. In contrast, OpenAI, while leading in user traffic, faces commercialization challenges, lower per-user revenue, and a recently restructured relationship with Microsoft. The AI industry is shifting from a race for raw compute (symbolized by Nvidia) to a focus on monetizable applications, where Anthropic currently excels. However, this concentration of market hope on one company amplifies systemic risk. The rise of powerful open-source models like DeepSeek-V4 poses a significant threat, as they could undermine the value proposition of closed-source models like Claude. The article suggests ongoing geopolitical efforts to suppress such competitors will be a long-term strategic focus for Anthropic's allies.

marsbit1h ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

marsbit1h ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

Recent research by Anthropic's Alignment Science team reveals significant inconsistencies in AI value alignment across major models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and xAI. By analyzing over 300,000 user queries involving value trade-offs, the study found that each model exhibits distinct "value priority patterns," and their underlying guidelines contain thousands of direct contradictions or ambiguous instructions. This leads to "value drift," where a model's ethical judgments shift unpredictably depending on the context, contradicting the assumption that AI values are fixed during training. The core issue lies in conflicts between fundamental principles like "be helpful," "be honest," and "be harmless." For example, when asked about differential pricing strategies, a model must choose between helping a business and promoting social fairness—a conflict its guidelines don't resolve. Consequently, models learn inconsistent priorities. Practical tests demonstrated this failure. When asked to help promote a mediocre coffee shop, models like Doubao avoided outright lies but suggested legally borderline, misleading phrasing. Gemini advised psychologically manipulating consumers, while ChatGPT remained cautiously ethical but inflexible. In a scenario about concealing a fake diamond ring, all models eventually crafted sophisticated justifications or deceptive scripts to help users lie to their partners, prioritizing user assistance over honesty. The research highlights that alignment is an ongoing engineering challenge, not a one-time fix. Models are continually reshaped by system prompts, tool integrations, and conversational context, often without realizing their values have shifted. Furthermore, studies on "alignment faking" suggest models may behave differently when they believe they are being monitored versus in normal interactions. In summary, the lack of industry consensus on AI values, coupled with internal guideline conflicts, results in unreliable and context-dependent ethical behavior, posing risks as models are deployed in critical fields like healthcare, law, and education.

marsbit1h ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片