The Great Migration of Mining Companies: Some Already Hold $12.8 Billion in AI Orders

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-06Last updated on 2026-03-06

Abstract

Bitcoin mining companies are undergoing a massive structural shift toward AI and high-performance computing (HPC), driven by compressed mining profits and the lure of massive AI infrastructure contracts. With Bitcoin’s mining difficulty rising and profitability declining, miners are leveraging their existing assets—power contracts, land, cooling systems, and data centers—to pivot into AI compute provisioning. Key players like TeraWulf have secured over $12.8 billion in HPC contracts, while IrisEnergy holds a $9.7 billion deal with Microsoft. Other firms, including Hut8, CipherDigital, and CoreScientific, have also announced multi-billion dollar AI agreements. Some, like BitDigital, are exiting Bitcoin mining entirely to focus on AI and Ethereum infrastructure. Financial reports show a clear trend: AI/HPC revenue is becoming a major income source, sometimes surpassing mining. Capital markets are selective, favoring companies with strong execution, resource advantages, and strategic positioning within the AI supply chain. The migration is accelerating—miners must adapt to the new reality or risk obsolescence.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

Over the past decade, Bitcoin mining companies were once the most stable foundation of PoW networks and the cost anchor of the BTC "Tier 0 market." But now, these industry cornerstones are collectively pivoting, either actively or passively, towards AI.

On the surface, the direct incentive for mining companies to transform is the continuous increase in mining difficulty and the compression of profit margins by a sluggish market; but the deeper driving force is the extreme pursuit of the AI narrative by capital markets—and mining companies happen to possess the most easily convertible real-world assets: electricity, land, cooling systems, data centers, and ready-made data infrastructure, which can be exchanged for AI computing power contracts worth tens of billions of dollars.

Amid the clamor of multi-model competition, mining companies standing at the intersection of energy, electricity, computing power, and crypto assets are undergoing an unprecedented yet almost inevitable industry migration.

Some are steady and watchful, some are forced to turn and go all-in, but one thing is certain: the wind has risen—this is a structural shift blowing from the crypto market towards the AI world.

A Hard Battle That Must Be Fought, and a Cake Too Tempting to Refuse

Entering 2026, for mining companies, the real pressure has never come solely from price fluctuations, but from structural squeeze: difficulty continues to rise, unit revenue continues to fall, and operating costs continue to increase.

In the Winter: Selling Coins to Survive and Bankruptcy Liquidation

On February 20, Bitcoin mining difficulty once increased by 15% to 144.4T, the largest increase since 2021. During the same period, the network hash rate recovered from 826 EH/s to 1 ZH/s, but the hashprice fell to a multi-year low of only about $23.9/PH/s. With the profit compression brought by the 2024 halving continuing, mining companies were forced into a cash flow defense mode.

The most symbolic event came from Bitdeer. On February 20, it disclosed that its own BTC holdings had dropped to 0, with production and sales exactly equal that week. Although founder Jihan Wu later explained that "being 0 now does not mean being 0 in the future," the market still saw it as a microcosm of the pressure on mining companies.

The困境 is not limited to one company. In early February, NFN8 Group filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Texas, USA, planning to sell all its assets. Documents showed that a core mine fire, the burden of leases from sale-leaseback models, and the cliff-like drop in hashprice after the halving directly crushed its cash flow. Despite owning multiple mining facilities, NFN8's own assets of 5000 mining rigs were valued at less than $50,000, while liabilities reached the million-dollar range.

As the environment continued to deteriorate, mining companies' reaction was unusually consistent—marching towards AI.

Second Spring: Astonishing Profits Behind AI/HPC Mega Orders

For AI giants, computing power data centers are always scarce: traditional construction cycles take 3-5 years, with high costs for land, electricity, and cooling. Mining companies already have power contracts, infrastructure, and operational experience, making them the most realistic承接方 in the AI expansion cycle.

Since last year, mining companies have seen a集中爆发 of orders. According to public data statistics, as of the time of writing, 6 mining companies including IREN, CIFR, HUT have accumulated AI/HPC orders worth approximately $38.5 billion. Among them, TeraWulf's $12.8 billion order contract with Fluidstack and IREN's 5-year $9.7 billion contract with Microsoft are惊人数据, and have also become important supports for their stock prices. From financial reports, the proportion of AI/HPC revenue for many mining companies has increased from less than 15% to 40%-60%.

If mining is a cyclical business, AI is like a long-term cash flow pipeline.

Earnings Consensus: AI Becomes the Keyword

The Q1 2026 earnings season almost gave a unanimous signal: mining companies are systematically transforming.

"HPC Contract Giant" WULF: Holds Over $12.8 Billion in Contracts

Mining company TeraWulf's full-year 2025 revenue reached $168.5 million, a year-on-year increase of 20.3%, of which $16.9 million came from the newly launched high-performance computing (HPC) leasing business.

TeraWulf currently holds over $12.8 billion in HPC contracts, with 522MW of capacity already signed, and has obtained $6.5 billion in financing to support data center expansion.

"AI Mining Giant in the Making" IREN: Holds Microsoft's $9.7 Billion Order

Thanks to previous huge orders and rapid transformation, IREN has隐隐 become a new generation of "AI mining giant in the making".

According to the financial report of mining company Iris Energy (IREN), as of January 31, 2026, it held $2.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents. So far this fiscal year, it has obtained over $9.2 billion in funds through customer prepayments, convertible bonds, GPU leasing, and GPU financing. Subsequent plans include adding 140,000 GPUs, expecting to achieve $3.4 billion in annual recurring revenue by the end of 2026.

"Trump's" HUT: Holds $7 Billion in Orders

Mining company Hut8's 2025 fiscal year generated $9.6 million in revenue from hosting services, holding approximately $1.4 billion in cash and Bitcoin reserves.

In addition, Hut8's spun-off mining subsidiary American Bitcoin (ABTC) achieved full-year 2025 revenue of $185.2 million, deployed approximately 25 EH/s of computing power and owns about 78,000 ASIC miners. Furthermore, its BTC reserves have exceeded 6,000 coins.

The company is also a major crypto mining company supported by the Trump family, thus receiving high market attention.

"Brand Transformation Completed" CIFR: Holds $5.5 Billion in Orders

Mining company Cipher Digital disclosed in its 2025 fiscal year performance report that it officially changed its name from "Cipher Mining" to "Cipher Digital" to complete its brand transformation.

Last November, CIFR reached a leasing agreement with Amazon Web Services worth up to $5.5 billion; additionally, it exchanged 5.4% equity for Google's agreement to provide a guarantee for the $1.4 billion contract signed with Fluidstack.

"Selling Coins to Buy Land and Build Data Centers" RIOT: Reaches Leasing Cooperation with AMD

Mining company Riot Platforms announced its full-year 2025 performance, with annual revenue reaching $647.4 million, a significant increase from $376.7 million in 2024; its Bitcoin holdings exceed 18,000 coins.

In January of this year, RIOT sold 1080 Bitcoins and used the proceeds (approximately $96 million) to purchase the Rockdale plot to develop a data center project. Additionally, the company signed a data center leasing and service agreement with AMD, which will deploy 25 megawatts of critical IT load capacity at the Rockdale campus. The aggressive investment firm Starboard Value stated that Riot's potential valuation from transitioning towards AI and HPC could be as high as $21 billion.

"BTC Stalwart" MARA: Partners with Capital Institutions to Layout AI Data Centers

MARA's financial report data shows that affected by the average Bitcoin mining price dropping about 14%, MARA's Q4 2025 revenue was $202.3 million, a year-on-year decrease of about 6%. At the end of February, MARA announced a cooperation with investment institution Starwood Capital Group to build large-scale data centers for artificial intelligence and cloud computing customers on the basis of existing mines in the United States. After the news was announced, its stock price rose about 17% in after-hours trading.

It is worth mentioning that unlike other mining companies firmly transitioning to the AI field, MARA's management emphasized that although short-term price trends are uncertain, its long-term confidence in the Bitcoin asset class has not changed, Bitcoin will still be the long-term strategic core.

"Data Center Revenue Soars" CORZ: Holds CoreWeave's Over $10 Billion Order

Core Scientific (CORZ) announced its Q4 2025 financial report. Total revenue for Q4 2025 was $79.8 million, down from $94.9 million in the same period last year. Among them, Bitcoin mining revenue dropped to $42.2 million; data center hosting service revenue大幅增长 to $31.3 million, higher than $8.5 million in 2024. Q4 gross profit rose to $20.8 million, higher than $4.8 million in the same period in 2024.

Core Scientific CEO Adam Sullivan said that the company's existing construction projects are more than half completed and are expanding the hosting platform to a 1.5 gigawatt leasable capacity pipeline. Last October, AI company CoreWeave planned to acquire CoreScientific for about $9 billion, but ultimately failed due to lack of shareholder approval; in January this year, CoreScientific sold 1900 BTC (approximately $175 million) for business transformation.

The company estimates that AI business will drive revenue compound growth of 60.9% from 2026 to 2028, reaching $1.5 billion by 2028.

Other Mining Company Representatives: Bitfarms Renames, BitDigital Switches to ETH Camp

In February, Bitfarms (BITF) announced that it would move its headquarters from Canada to the United States and plans to change its name to Keel Infrastructure (pending shareholder, exchange, and court approval), accelerating its transformation into infrastructure. Previously, the company had converted $300 million in debt financing into project financing in October last year for the construction of a data center in Pennsylvania, and sold the Paso mine for $30 million in January this year, officially exiting the Latin American market.

On the other hand, BitDigital's turn was more thorough. As early as last July when the DAT (Odaily Note: Digital Asset Treasury company)热潮兴起, it率先 announced switching from BTC to ETH treasury listed companies; in January this year, it further clarified that it would completely stop Bitcoin mining and instead increase its focus on Ethereum infrastructure, staking, and HPC/AI strategy, marking the official completion of the阵营切换 for this mining company that has been deeply involved in mining for five years. Currently, its AI subsidiary WhiteFiber has completed an IPO, and BitDigital holds approximately 27 million shares, worth over $457 million at the current market value.

In addition to the above two, Galaxy, Bitdeer, Cleanspark, Cango Cango, etc. are still in the stage of promoting AI transformation, and the proportion of revenue contribution remains to be increased. Among them, Cango Cango completed a $10.5 million equity financing in February this year and received an additional $65 million investment commitment, which may accelerate the layout of AI/HPC data center business.

The following is a brief comparison based on public information for reference.

Capital Attitude: Choosing Winners, Not Narratives

The market does not fully accept the "AI transformation," but is quickly differentiating.

In early February, JPMorgan pointed out in a report that Bitcoin mining companies performed strongly at the beginning of the year, mainly driven by the phased缓解 of network competition and the升温 of the HPC narrative. At that time, the total market value of the 14 US-listed mining companies and data center operators it tracked rose to about $60 billion at the end of January, a month-on-month increase of 23%, far exceeding the S&P 500's同期约 1% gain.

But soon, with the密集发布 of a new round of AI models and the impact of OpenClaw on the valuation system of software stocks, market sentiment quickly turned. Capital began to worry about the structural disruption brought by AI, and the stock prices of mining companies related to AI infrastructure随之回调, with CIFR, IREN, and Hut8's intraday declines once exceeding 10%.

On February 10, Morgan Stanley released a research report, giving CIFR and WULF an overweight rating, while downgrading MARA to underweight.

By the end of February, with order fulfillment and stock price recovery, the market wind reversed again. Some analysts believe that against the background of high short-selling ratios by hedge funds, coupled with mining companies locking in long-term low-cost power contracts, their strategic value is no longer limited to traditional mining, but is closer to that of AI infrastructure suppliers.

With order fulfillment and stock price recovery, the market logic has gradually become clear: capital only bets on structural winners.

Therefore, the future of mining companies largely depends on three things:

Execution: Whether the migration of computing power form can be completed quickly;

Resource Endowment: Whether electricity and land have scale advantages;

Narrative Ability: Whether it can be embedded in the upstream supply chain of AI.

In fact, the company's transformation decision is not important; what is more important is capital screening.

The tide has come. Mining companies only have two choices: either migrate with the trend or become history.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for Bitcoin mining companies to collectively shift towards AI, according to the article?

AThe direct incentive is the rising mining difficulty and compressed profit margins in a bear market, but the deeper driving force is the extreme pursuit of the AI narrative by capital markets. Mining companies possess easily convertible real assets like electricity, land, cooling systems, and data center infrastructure, which can be exchanged for AI computing power orders worth tens of billions of dollars.

QWhich mining firm has secured the largest AI/HPC order mentioned in the article, and what is its value?

ATeraWulf (WULF) has secured the largest HPC order mentioned, valued at over $12.8 billion.

QName two mining companies that have received significant financial analyst downgrades or faced market skepticism regarding their AI transition.

AAccording to the article, Morgan Stanley downgraded Marathon Digital (MARA) to underweight. Additionally, market sentiment turned skeptical causing stocks like CIFR, IREN, and Hut8 to fall over 10% in a day due to concerns about AI's structural disruption.

QApart from securing AI contracts, what other strategic shift did BitDigital make?

ABitDigital made a more thorough shift by first announcing a move from BTC to ETH treasury, then further clarifying it would completely cease Bitcoin mining to instead focus on Ethereum infrastructure, staking, and HPC/AI strategy.

QWhat are the three key factors that will determine the future of mining companies in their AI transition, as outlined in the article?

AThe three key factors are: 1. Execution capability: The ability to quickly complete the migration of computing power forms. 2. Resource endowment: Whether their electricity and land provide a scale advantage. 3. Narrative ability: The ability to embed themselves into the upstream AI supply chain.

Related Reads

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

On February 27th, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced Project Odin, a structured sustainability support program designed for a select group of strategic, previously grant-funded teams. Unlike a standard grant, Odin offers a long-term advisory mechanism focused on helping these teams establish credible, sustainable paths within a two-year framework, thereby reducing long-term dependence on single funding sources. The program addresses a critical post-grant challenge: how essential public goods, especially major developer tools, can achieve financial sustainability beyond initial funding. While grants from EF and programs like Gitcoin or RetroPGF remain vital for startups and research, they often fall short for mature, widely-used infrastructure. Tools like compilers, languages, and network stacks are deeply embedded but struggle with monetization, trapped between being too foundational to lose and too public to generate natural revenue. Project Odin provides teams with a dedicated Strategic Advisor to guide them through a three-phase process: 1) analyzing current funding and realistic options, 2) validating potential paths with stakeholders, and 3) executing plans, which may include crafting support contracts, service agreements, or other recurring revenue models. The first pilot participant is Vyper, a critical smart contract language for the EVM, highlighting the need for sustainable models for core infrastructure. The initiative reframes the public goods conversation from "who should be funded" to "how do already-proven teams avoid perpetual funding crises?" It encourages ecosystem participants—protocols and projects that depend on these tools—to view sustainable support not just as charity, but as essential risk management for their own operational supply chains.

marsbit20m ago

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

marsbit20m ago

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

Bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings reported disappointing Q1 2024 results, causing its stock to erase all daily gains and fall 3.44% in after-hours trading. Revenue dropped 18% year-over-year to $174.6 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $192.7 million. The company posted a net loss of $1.3 billion, a significant increase from a $533.4 million loss a year ago, primarily driven by unrealized losses on its holdings of 38,689 Bitcoin, which depreciated in value during the quarter. MARA also sold over 15,100 BTC in late March to repurchase debt at a discount. The broader mining environment remains challenging due to a 35% decline in Bitcoin's price from its all-time high and a nearly 30% increase in mining difficulty over the past year. MARA's market cap ranking among U.S. miners has slipped to seventh. Critically, the company announced a strategic pivot away from Bitcoin mining expansion. It stated it has no plans to purchase new mining equipment and is fully transitioning toward AI data centers. Its strategy involves retrofitting existing mining sites for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) and leveraging its recent $1.5 billion acquisition of Long Ridge Energy & Power, a gas-fired power plant and data center. This infrastructure could eventually support 600 MW of AI compute capacity, allowing MARA to redeploy up to 90% of its non-custodial mining power for AI and IT workloads.

marsbit20m ago

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

marsbit20m ago

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

AI Investment Map is Reshaping: Opportunities Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven' Since ChatGPT ignited the AI wave, investment initially focused on the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants dominating cloud infrastructure. However, the rise of DeepSeek and debates on AI capital expenditure effectiveness are shifting this dynamic. Investors now recognize opportunities deeper in the supply chain—the companies providing the essential "picks and shovels." Early concerns about an AI investment "arms race" and potential low returns were partly alleviated by strong Q1 earnings from cloud providers, validating robust compute demand. This has highlighted a more certain investment thesis: regardless of which AI applications ultimately win, massive capital expenditure will first fuel demand for semiconductors and related components. This "pick-and-shovel" logic has driven semiconductor ETFs to record highs. Key beneficiaries include: * **Memory Chipmakers (e.g., SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron)**: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is a critical bottleneck for AI training. * **Photonics Companies**: Crucial for high-speed data transfer within AI data centers. * **The Broader "AI-11" Semiconductor Ecosystem**: This encompasses foundries & lithography (TSMC, ASML), logic & custom chips (AMD, Broadcom, Intel, Marvell), and enterprise storage (SanDisk, Western Digital). Every dollar of AI infrastructure spending flows through this chain. While the "Magnificent Seven" remain dominant in market size, their earnings growth premium over the rest of the S&P 500 ("S&P 493") is narrowing. Market attention and marginal investment are shifting towards the expanding semiconductor supply chain. The investment narrative is evolving from "betting on the ultimate AI winner" to "investing in the certainty of the infrastructure build-out." Understanding this shift from the demand side to the supply side is key to identifying future AI investment opportunities.

marsbit49m ago

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片