The Glamour Belongs to the 'Epsteins', Saylor Just Wants to Hoard Bitcoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

Summary: The recently unsealed Epstein files revealed an unexpected connection to Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy (now Strategy). In a 2010 email, Epstein's PR coordinator, Peggy Siegal, complained about Saylor's presence at a high-society dinner, describing him as a "zombie on drugs" who was impossible to engage socially and had no personality or understanding of social etiquette. This social awkwardness, however, may have been his saving grace, as it from deeper involvement in the scandal. This perceived personal flaw is presented as a professional strength in his role as a Bitcoin maximalist. Saylor’s company is the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, with 712,647 BTC purchased at an average cost of $76,037. Despite recent market volatility pushing the price down and his company's stock falling 60%, Saylor remains committed to his strategy of buying Bitcoin weekly, famously tweeting "More Orange" to signal his intent to continue accumulating. The article argues that the traits that made him a social outcast—being闷 (boring), uninteresting, and unresponsive to external noise—are the exact same traits that make him a successful "Bitcoin zombie." His strategy is simple and requires no complex decision-making: buy and never sell. While his approach is not advisable for the average investor without his corporate financial tools, the core lesson is that in investing, "interesting" strategies like frequent trading and chasing hype often lead to losses. The most profitable ...

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

There's a reason why someone can hold onto 710,000 Bitcoins.

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice released documents related to the Epstein case, spanning 3 million pages. Politicians, billionaires, celebrities—a string of names are popping out from these materials. And Michael Saylor, the founder of MicroStrategy (formerly known as MicroStrategy), is also in there.

However, Saylor's appearance is a bit special; he was at the table that got rejected.

From the currently available information, in 2010, Epstein's publicist Peggy Siegal complained in a private email:

"There's this guy named Saylor who spent twenty-five thousand dollars on a dinner ticket, and I was responsible for socializing with him. But this guy was completely impossible to talk to, like a drugged-up zombie. I couldn't stand it and ran away halfway through."

Peggy's main job was as a Hollywood movie publicist, with a side gig of organizing dinners for Epstein, essentially scouting for wealthy people to pull into the circle.

Socializing with the wealthy, helping them meet the right people at parties and dinners, having a good time, and spending money comfortably. After decades in the business, she's按理说 seen all kinds of billionaires.

But Saylor, she couldn't handle.

The reason wasn't that he had character flaws; it was that he was too dull. He paid to get in, sat there, couldn't engage in conversation, and had no interest in socializing whatsoever.

Peggy's exact words were,"I don't even know if I can take his money, I don't know where to start trying to manipulate him... He has no personality, completely不懂 social etiquette."

Now that the Epstein case has exploded, people on the list are busy distancing themselves. Saylor, on the other hand, never managed to挤进去 in the first place.

Being excessively boring and autistic became a protective shield.

But when this "boredom" is placed in a different context, it's another story.

Saylor's company, MicroStrategy (formerly known as MicroStrategy), is the publicly traded company holding the most Bitcoin globally. This January, when Bitcoin was still oscillating around $90,000, they bought over 37,000 more Bitcoins, spending $3.5 billion.

Buying almost every week, rain or shine.

As of now, MicroStrategy holds 712,647 Bitcoins, with an average cost of $76,037. And today, Bitcoin just fell below $76,000, meaning Saylor's position is right at the break-even line.

The market fear index hit a 20-week high, and the crypto world is filled with cries of despair. MicroStrategy's stock price has also fallen 60% from its peak.

But Saylor tweeted "More Orange," implying he will continue buying next week.

Back then, Peggy said he was like a zombie. Looking at it now, hoarding Bitcoin might be a job that only a zombie can do.

No explanations, no timing the market, no getting off the ride. No feeling for the outside world, and feeling good about oneself.

And while Peggy complained back then about not knowing how to help him spend money, Saylor has clearly found his way to spend it: buying Bitcoin with all of it.

Judging from that email, Saylor was an outsider in the world of fame and fortune. He couldn't sit still, couldn't hold a conversation, spent an evening as if he wasn't even there. But this kind of person can反而 sit still in trading.

No need to socialize, no need to manage relationships, no need to揣摩 others' thoughts. Just focus on one thing, buy every week, and never sell.

Dull, uninteresting, unfeeling towards the outside world... These traits are flaws in social settings, but when it comes to hoarding Bitcoin, they might be a talent.

After this news spread, classic memes have already appeared on Twitter,大意是 Saylor has no interest in underage girls but is extremely obsessed with underage assets.

From a hindsight perspective, this exposure has, to some extent, also树立了 a positive image for Saylor.

After the Epstein case broke out in 2019, Peggy, the publicist, had her contracts with clients like Netflix and FX全部取消, which basically ended her PR career; while Saylor is now one of the world's largest Bitcoin holders.

The rejected person is still buying Bitcoin, the person who rejected him is already out of the game.

But to be fair, Saylor's current situation isn't that轻松 either.

The new Fed Chairman Warsh is偏鹰, and the market expects he won't aggressively cut interest rates after taking office. Once interest rate expectations change, all kinds of assets globally face collective pressure.

Gold fell, silver fell, and Bitcoin fell even harder.

Coupled with tariff friction and tense U.S.-Europe relations, capital is starting to flee to traditional safe-haven assets. Bitcoin's narrative as "digital gold" is gradually fading.

If Bitcoin continues to fall, MicroStrategy's ability to raise capital by issuing new shares will become weaker and weaker, and the flywheel of币股轮转 could turn into a death spiral.

But Saylor really doesn't seem to care about these things; this might be the other side of "boredom."

Ordinary investors can't do what Saylor does, not because they lack money, but because they are too "normal." Normal people read the news, look at K-lines, and listen to what others say. When the fear index spikes, their hands start to itch, and their hearts start to ache.

They make decisions every day, and each decision消耗 willpower.

Whereas in Saylor's strategy, there似乎 isn't a "decision-making"环节. Buying is the only action; not selling is the only principle.

In his own words:"Bitcoin is the best asset ever invented by humankind, why would I sell?"

You can call this faith, or you can call it obsession. But from an execution perspective, the biggest advantage of this system is:

It doesn't require you to be smart, it only requires you to be boring.

Of course, this is not advice for you to imitate him. Saylor's底气 is a publicly traded company; he can issue stock, he can borrow money. Ordinary people don't have these;模仿 his posture will most likely only lead to losses.

But there is one thing that can perhaps be learned.

In investing, "fun" is often the source of losses.

Frequent trading, chasing hot topics, following news, using leverage... these behaviors that make investing "fun" are precisely the enemy of returns.

And the strategies that真正赚钱 are often so boring they make people want to sleep.

Saylor's case is a bit extreme, but the logic holds. In a market full of noise, "boredom" might be the most scarce ability.

Those who were skilled at socializing at parties back then are now either distancing themselves, under investigation, or have completely disappeared.

Perhaps, hoarding Bitcoin and being a person share the same principle:

Don't stay long in lively places; boring things are worth doing long-term.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy was Michael Saylor described as 'like a drugged zombie' in the Epstein case documents?

AHe was described this way by Epstein's publicist, Peggy Siegal, because he was socially awkward, unable to engage in conversation, and showed no interest in socializing at a dinner he paid $25,000 to attend.

QWhat is the name of Michael Saylor's company and what is its primary investment strategy?

AHis company is called MicroStrategy (now Strategy), and its primary investment strategy is to accumulate and hold Bitcoin as a treasury asset, making regular purchases regardless of market conditions.

QHow many Bitcoins does MicroStrategy (Strategy) currently hold, and what is its average cost basis?

AAs of the article's publication, MicroStrategy holds 712,647 Bitcoins with an average cost basis of $76,037 per coin.

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason Saylor's 'boring' personality is an advantage in his Bitcoin strategy?

AHis 'boring' and socially disinterested personality allows him to execute a simple, unwavering strategy of buying and holding Bitcoin without being swayed by market noise, news, or emotional decision-making, which is often a detriment to average investors.

QWhat broader investment lesson does the article suggest can be learned from Michael Saylor's approach?

AThe article suggests that in investing, 'interesting' behaviors like frequent trading, chasing trends, and using leverage are often the enemy of returns. Truly profitable strategies are often simple and 'boring,' requiring discipline and a long-term focus amidst market volatility.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

406 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片